Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/gy5m7086Keywords:
good governance, social welfare, anti-corruption, IndonesiaAbstract
--A corruption-free of Indonesia is a big challenge for all the people in Indonesia. The characteristics of corruption in Indonesia are so complex and entrenched in order that the efforts to eradicate corruption are systematic, integrated and focused. This article offers an Anti-Corruption Model that combines all anti-corruption programs so that the governance process can run transparently and accountably to achieve an Indonesia that has legal certainty, sustainable development and quality of life. This article was written using the meta-analysis method. This is done by reviewing previous research and studying various relevant literature. Then, an in-depth analysis of empirical facts combined with a comprehensive literature review results in Anti- Corruption Model 1:99. Anti-Corruption Model 1: 99 is an answer to the challenge in create a corruption-free Indonesia. This model covers all aspects of needs and covers every aspect of community life. In the end, the synergy and integration of all components anti-corruption innovation in the community. It can be executed so that it is realized in the form of concrete actions.
Key words--, ,
Downloads
References
1. A. Cuervo-Cazurra, “Corruption in international business,” J. World Bus., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2016.
2. J. Gardiner, Political corruption: Concepts and contexts, 3rd ed. USA & UK: Transaction Publishers, 2017.
3. S. Rose-Ackerman, Corruption: A study in political economy. New York, San Francisco, & London: ACADEMIC PRESS, INC., 2013.
4. Saifuddin, “Revolusi mental dalam perspektif Al-qur’an: Studi penafsiran M Quraish Shihab,” MAGZHA J. Ilmu Al-Qura’n dan Tafsir, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–66, 2016.
5. A. K. Jain, “Corruption: A review,” J. Econ. Surv., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 71–121, 2008.
6. S. A. Mapuasari and H. Mahmudah, “Korupsi berjamaah: Konsensus sosial atas gratifikasi dan suap,” Integritas, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 159–176, 2018.
7. E. L. Glaeser and R. E. Saks, “Corruption in America,” J. Public Econ., vol. 90, no. 6–7, pp. 1053–1072, 2006.
8. A. Swamy, S. Knack, Y. Lee, and O. Azfar, “Gender and corruption,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 25–55, 2001.
9. B. U. Denkur, “Hari antikorupsi, jurnalis hukum Bandung suarakan korupsi menyengsarakan rakyat,” https://www.dara.co.id/, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.dara.co.id/hari-antikorupsi-jurnalis- hukum-bandung-suarakan-korupsi-menyengsarakan-rakyat.html. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
10. M. Bunga, M. D. Maroa, A. Arief, and H. Djanggih, “Urgensi peran serta masyarakat dalam upaya pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi,” Law Reform, vol. 15, no. 1, 2019.
11. S. P. Huntington, “Modernization and corruption,” in Political Corruption, Concepts, and Contexts, 3rd ed., Heidenheimer and Johnston, Eds. New Jersey: Transaction Publisher, 2009, p. 253.
12. V. H. Claypool, W. M. Reisinger, M. Zaloznaya, Y. Hu, and J. Juehring, “Tsar Putin and the ‘corruption’ thorn in his side: The demobilization of votes in a competitive authoritarian regime,” Elect. Stud., vol. 54,
pp. 182–204, 2018.
13. A. N. Hafizah, “Analisis aspek hukum tindak pidana korupsi dalam rangka pendidikan anti korupsi,” J. KOSMIK Huk., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2018.
14. S. Rose-Ackerman and B. J. Palifka, Corruption and government: Causes, consequences and reform, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
15. M. Shan, Y. Le, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu, Effectiveness of prevailing anti-corruption strategies. 2019.
16. M. H. Shubhan, Eman, and R. H. S. Aisyah, “Competency identification of officials in public service,” IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 46–50, 2013.
17. A. Ashkaf, “Pengertian sistem dan contohnya (softskill),” (https://arifashkaf.wordpress. com/, 2015. [Online]. Available: (https://arifashkaf.wordpress. com/2015/10/14/ pengertian-sistem-dan-contohnya- softskill/.html. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
18. I. G. A. A. D. Widhiyaastuti and I. G. K. Ariawan, “Meningkatkan kesadaran generasi muda untuk berperilaku anti koruptif melalui pendidikan anti korupsi,” Acta Com., vol. 1, pp. 17–25, 2018.
19. E. Indriati, Pola dan akar korupsi: Menghancurkan lingkaran setan dosa publik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2014.
20. A. P. Utama, “Korupsi dalam perspektif budaya,” https://geotimes.co.id/, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://geotimes.co.id/opini/korupsi-dalam-perspektif-budaya/. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
21. R. A. A. Wattimena, Filsafat anti korupsi: Membedah hasrat kuasa, pemburuan kenikmatan, dan sisi hewani manusia di balik korupsi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2012.
22. M. Syamsudin, “Korupsi dalam perspektif budaya hukum,” Unisia, vol. 30, no. 64, pp. 183–194, 2007.
23. H. Jamil et al., Gratifikasi dalam perspektif agama gratifikasi dalam perspektif agama. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2019.
24. K. Republik Indonesia, “Antikorupsi dimulai dari diri sendiri,” https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/berita/antikorupsi-dimulai-dari-diri-sendiri/. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
25. A. Kurniawan, “Pengembangan ide kreatif dan inovatif serta tahapannya lengkap,” https://www.gurupendidikan.co.id/, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurupendidikan.co.id/pengembangan-ide-kreatif-dan-inovatif/. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
26. R. Windiarsih and A. Etikariena, “The relationship between proactive personality and innovative work behavior in BUMN x,” J. Psikogenes., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2017.
27. R. A. Cunningham, “Douglas McGregor - a lasting impression,” Ivey Bus. J. Online, p. 1, 2011.
28. T. C. Head, “Douglas McGregor’s legacy: lessons learned, lessons lost,” J. Manag. Hist., vol. 17, no. 2,
pp. 202–216, 2011.
29. M. Achmad, S. Hartoyo, B. Arifin, and M. S. Didu, “Model policy design for the beef cattle development in South Sulawesi,” J. Mangement Bus. Rev., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 166–182, 2014.
30. Fatkhuri, “Korupsi dalam Birokrasi dan Strategi Pencegahannya,” J. Ilm. Manaj. Publik dan Kebijak. Sos., 2018.
31. S. Suwitri, “Pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia: Sebuah upaya reformasi birokrasi,” DIALOGUE J. Ilmu Adm. dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–41, 2007.
32. M. M. Ahmad, “Reformasi birokrasi dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi di Kabupaten Batang : kepemimpinan Yoyok Riyo Sudibyo, periode 2012 – 2017,” J. Polit. Goverment Stud., vol. 6, 2017.
33. W. R. King and J. He, “Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 16, no. 32, 2005.
34. Yulianti and P. Sulistyowati, “Reaktualisasi pendidikan karakter dalam mengembangkan pola pikir mahasiswa sebagai konsep revolusi mental,” J. Inspirasi Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2018.
35. A. Hassim, “Revolusi Industri 4.0,” https://investor.id/, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://investor.id/archive/revolusi-industri-40. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
36. M. S. LeClair, “Malfeasance in the charitable sector: Determinants of ‘soft’ corruption at nonprofit organizations,” J. Public Integr., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–68, 2019.
37. H. Zhang et al., “Anti-corruption efforts, public perception of corruption, and government credibility in the field of real estate: An empirical analysis based on twelve provinces in China,” Cities, vol. 90, pp. 64–73, 2019.
38. A. Schaefer, “Corporate sustainability-integrating environmental and social concerns?,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 179–187, 2004.
39. N. Berggrena and C. Bjørnskovac, “Corruption, judicial accountability and inequality: Unfair procedures may benefit the worst-off,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 170, pp. 341–354, 2020.
40. A. A. Sofe, “Assessment of corruption in the humanitarian assistance in Puntland State of Somalia,” Crime, J. Financ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 104–118, 2020.
41. M. H. Wismabrata, “Komentar tokoh seputar kasus Dahnil Anzar, jaga jarak menurut Ketum PP Muhammadiyah hingga dukungan,” https://regional.kompas.com/, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/11/27/19552291/komentar-tokoh-seputar-kasus-dahnil-anzar- jaga-jarak-menurut-ketum-pp?page=all. [Accessed: 21-Feb-2020].
42. E. Kolthoff, “Prevention of corruption in local governments: The Netherlands,” in Conrence on Public
Integrity and Anticorruption in the Public Service, 2007, no. May, pp. 29–30.
43. Quadri, Kunle Alabi, Christian Eseigbe Imafidon, Rufus Ojo Akomolafe, and . 2019. Kolaviron mitigates proteinuria and potentiates loop diuresis in Wistar rats: Relevance to normal renal function. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 10 (1), 58-67. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190112122816
44. Chu, H., Yang, J., Mi, S., Bhuyan, S.S., Li, J., Zhong, L., Liu, S., Tao, Z., Li, J., Chen, H.Tumor necrosis factor-alpha G-308 A polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction: A casecontrol study and meta-analysis(2012) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 3 (2), pp. 84-90. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.95359
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
