Citizen Relationship Management (CnRM) to Build the Awareness of Anti-Corruption: Collaborative Governance Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ypdtqf36Keywords:
-Citizen Relationship Management (CnRM), demographics’ bonus, collaborative governance, anti-corruption awarenessAbstract
KPK is an independent institution that has a special obligation in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, but in carrying out its duties many obstacles and threats that so far have not yet found a solution. Seeing the demographic bonus that is currently being experienced by Indonesia, it is thought that intermittent between 2020-2035 is an opportunity as well as a threat that must be addressed wisely. Citizen Relationship Management (CnRM) is a new concept in managing internet-based national resources relating that the internet waves are undeniable. So that in the future practice of CnRM through collaborative governance is able to bring the future of the Indonesian people to be better. Using a qualitative approach from a variety of literature brings up a concept oriented to practical thinking. CnRM is an effort to instill a love for the nation wherever the citizens of a country are located, which means it has strong boundary to the nation. More specifically CnRM in this article focuses on moral issues for anti-corruption awareness. Based on a variety of literature and collaborations from the fields of science, the concept of thinking related to CnRM is obtained and how the flow of implementation in practice in the future. The implementation of CnRM as an effort to raise awareness of anti- corruption through collaborative governance is expected to be a media in the direction of a corruption-free gold generation in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
1. J. S. Davidson, Indonesia: Twenty Years of Democracy. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press, 2018.
2. E. Endarto, “Kendala KPK dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia,” J. Lingk. Widyaiswara, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 6–15, 2014.
3. P. L. Dina, “Ethics And Deontology in Public Administration,” Knowlegde Horizons, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013.
4. S. Aris, “Bureaucracy And Disruption Reform Policy,” RJOAS, vol. 9, no. September, pp. 37–51, 2018.
5. katadata.com, “Sepanjang 2018 Terdapat 454 Kasus Penindakan Dugaan Korupsi | Databoks,” p. 2018, 2018.
6. K. P. Korupsi, “Laporan Tahunan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Tahun2018,” p. 60, 2018.
7. P. M. Dewi, Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. 2010.
8. KPK, Kelembagaan KPK Untuk Umum. Jakarta, 2019.
9. S. Isra, Yuliandri, F. Amsari, and H. Tegnan, “Obstruction of justice in the effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia,” Int. J. Law, Crime Justice, vol. 51, pp. 72–83, 2017.
10. C. Boys, “Obstruction of Justice: an Overview of Some of the Federal Statutes that Prohibit Interference with Judicial, Executive, or Legislative Activities.,” CRS Rep. Congr. Congr. Res. Serv., 2010.
11. M. Mietzner, “Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia,” Crit. Asian Stud., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 587–610, 2015.
12. B. D. Lewis and A. Hendrawan, “The impact of majority coalitions on local government spending, service delivery, and corruption in Indonesia,” Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 58, pp. 178–191, 2019.
13. J. W. Buttle, S. Graham Davies, and A. E. Meliala, “A cultural constraints theory of police corruption: Understanding the persistence of police corruption in contemporary Indonesia,” Aust. New Zeal. J. Criminol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 437–454, 2016.
14. R. Ibrahim, M. A. Yusoff, and H. M. Koling, “Patterns and Causes of Corruption Among Government Officials in Indonesia,” J. Public Adm. Bus., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74–91, 2018.
15. W. Setiadi, “Korupsi di Indonesia,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 430–439, 2018.
16. M. Milošević, Ethics and public administration: Principles with no support, no. December. Podgorica, Montenegro: Institute Alternative, 2014.
17. W. Daly and R. Carnwell, “The case for a multi-method approach,” Nurse Res. (through 2013), vol. 8, no. 3, p. 30, 2001.
18. P. Cronin, F. Ryan, and M. Coughlan, “Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach,” Br. J. Nurs., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2008.
19. W. R. Jati, “Bonus Demografi sebagai Mesin Pertumbuhan Ekonomi: Jendela Peluang atau Jendela Bencana di Indonesia?,” Populasi, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2015.
20. N. Falikhah, “Bonus Demografi Peluang dan Tantangan Bagi Indonesia,” Alhadharah J. Ilmu Dakwah, vol. 16, no. 32, 2017.
21. B. P. Statistik, “Statistik Gender Tematik: Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia,” Kementeri. Pemberdaya. Peremp. Dan Perlindungan Anak, 2018.
22. J. J. Deal, D. G. Altman, and S. G. Rogelberg, “Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything),” J. Bus. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 2010.
23. E. Kroski, “On the move with the mobile web: libraries and mobile technologies,” Libr. Technol. Rep., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1–48, 2008.
24. W. Rajagukguk, R. Herartri, O. B. Samosir, and D. Agung, “Kontribusi Penduduk (Bonus Demografis) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia.” UKI Press, 2018.
25. I. G. A. A. D. Widhiyaastuti and I. G. K. Ariawan, “Meningkatkan Kesadaran Generasi Muda untuk Berperilaku Anti Koruptif melalui Pendidikan Anti Korupsi,” Acta Com. J. Huk. Kenotariatan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2018.
26. P. Astuti, “Lsm Dan Gerakan Anti Korupsi: Analisis Peran Lsm Dalam Membangun Kesadaran Anti
Korupsi Dan Dalam Memerangi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kota Semarang,” J. Ilmu Sos., vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 51–62, 2014.
27. M. Plotnikof, Challenges of Collaborative Governance: An Organizational Discourse Study of Public Managers’ Struggles with Collaboration across the Daycare Area. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS), 2015.
28. C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. public Adm. Res. theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008.
29. K. Emerson, T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh, “An integrative framework for collaborative governance,” J. public Adm. Res. theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012.
30. C. Huxham, S. Vangen, C. Huxham, and C. Eden, “The challenge of collaborative governance,” Public Manag. an Int. J. Res. Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 337–358, 2000.
31. J. Newman, M. Barnes, H. Sullivan, and A. Knops, “Public participation and collaborative governance,”
J. Soc. Policy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 203–223, 2004.
32. J. Freeman, “Collaborative governance in the administrative state,” UCLA L. Rev., vol. 45, p. 1, 1997.
33. P. Kotler, “Marketing Management, Millenium edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc,” A Pearson Educ. Co. Up. Saddle River, New Jersey, vol. 7458, 2000.
34. R. S. Winer, “A framework for customer relationship management,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 43, no. 4,
pp. 89–105, 2001.
35. R. N. Boer, “Mata Najwa dan Strategi Najwa Shihab untuk Memasarkan Narasi. tv.,” Ultim. J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 109–128, 2019.
36. E. R. Nawangsari and A. Kriswibowo, “Burial Service Quality Analysis Study in The Cemetery of Keputih Surabaya,” in 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Social & Political Enquiries (ICISPE 2018), 2019, vol. 366, no. Icispe 2018, pp. 150–153.
37. C. Shapiro and H. Varian, “Information rules: A strategic guide,” Cambridge: Harvard BusinessPress, 1998.
38. L. Arif and A. Kriswibowo, “Birokrasi,” Banyumas Sasanti Inst., 2018.
39. R. P. Warhurst, “Leadership development as identity formation: middle managers’ leadership learning from MBA study,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Int., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 471–487, 2012.
40. S. Beeton, Community development through tourism. Landlinks Press, 2006.
41. C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2018.
42. M. T. Imperial, “Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs,” Adm. Soc., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 281–320, 2005.
43. J. E. Innes and D. E. Booher, “Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue,” Deliberative policy Anal. Underst. Gov. Netw. Soc., pp. 33–59, 2003.
44. T. I. Gunton and J. C. Day, “The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management,” Environments, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 5–20, 2003.
45. Coulter, Ian, Gery Ryan, Lisa Kraus, Lea Xenakis, Lara Hilton, and . 2019. A Method for Deconstructing the Health Encounter in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Social Context. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 10 (2), 81-88. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190118123212
46. Yang, G., Hamacher, J., Gorshkov, B., White, R., Sridhar, S., Verin, A., Chakraborty, T., Lucas, R.The dual role of TNF in pulmonary edema(2010) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 1 (1), pp. 29-
36. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.59983
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
