Proof of Mens Rea and Actus Reus of Corporate as a Corruption Criminal Actor in Restoration of Criminal Law in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/4rayn144Keywords:
Mens Rea, Actus Reus, CorporateAbstract
Proving mens rea and actus reus corporations as corruptors is not an easy matter, considering that corporations are legal entities. Mens rea is a difficult element to prove from a corporation that is considered to have committed a crime because the corporation can only carry out actions through the organs of directors. When the perpetrator's actions are said to have fulfilled the formulation of offense (actus reus), then the investigator only needs to see whether the perpetrator has mens rea for the act so that criminal liability can be requested. This study uses interviews and data collection from speakers. The results of the study concluded that the way of proving a corporation in a criminal act of corruption is based on the dichotomy of the legal status between the corporation and the management of the corporation. Proof is done by dividing qualitatively about mens rea and actus reus owned by corporations with corporate management in criminal acts of corruption. The Ius contituendum in corruption is related to the renewal of the criminal law system in Indonesia, which can be done by updating the criminal procedure law which regulates the separation of legal liability between the corporation and the management of the corporation. The application of technical rules regarding the proof of mens rea and actus reus between the corporation and the management of the corporation under the law is considered to be contrary to the protection of the rights / obligations of legal subjects.
Downloads
References
1. Print, Darwan, “Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.
2. Bemmelen, JM van, “Hukum Pidana 1”, Bandung; Binacipta, 1987.
3. Akbari, Anugerah Rizki & Aulia Ali Reza, “Anotasi Putusan: Interpretasi Asimetris Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia Kajian Putusan Nomor 862 K/PID.SUS/2010”, Jurnal Dictum, Edisi 12 – Maret 2017.
4. Rifai, Eddy, “Persepekti Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Mimbar hukum, Universitas Gajah Mada, Vol. 26 No. 1 Tahun 2014.
5. Hutauruk, R. Rufinus Hotmaulana. “Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif: Suatu Terobosan Hukum”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
6. Atmasasmita, Romli, “Perbandingan Hukum Pidana”, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000.
7. Andrew Weissmann dan David Newman, “Rethinking Criminal Corporate Liability”, Indiana Law Journal, 2007.
8. Cristina Maglie, “Models of Corporate Criminal Liability in Comparative Law”, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Volume 4: 547, Januari 2005.
9. Anthony O Nwator, Corporate Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis, Journal African Law, Volume 57, Issue 01, April 2013.
10. Beth Stephens, “The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2002.
11. Pamela H. Bucy, “Trends In Corporate Criminal Prosecutions”, American Criminal Law Review, 2007.
12. Geraldine Szott Moohr, “On The Prospects Of Deterring Corporate Crime”, Journal of Business & Technology Law, 2007.
13. Stephanie Earl, “Ascertaining the Criminal Liability of a Corporation”, New Zealand Business Law Quarterly, 2007.
14. V. S. Khanna, “Corporate Liability Standars: When Should Corporation Be Criminality Liabel”?, American Criminal Law Review, 2000.
15. Sue Titus Reid, “Criminal Law”, Third Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995), hal. 53. Wayne R LaFave & Austin W. Scott Jr., Criminal Law, Michigan: West Publishing Co, 1982.
16. Andrew Weissmann dan David Newman, Rethinking Criminal Corporate Liability, “Indiana Law Journal”, 2007.
17. Leonard Orland, “The Transformation of Corporate Criminal Law,“ Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 2006.
18. Charity Scott, “Caveat Vendor: Broker-Dealer Liability Under the Securities Exchange Act,” Securities Regulation Law Journal, (Vol. 17, 1989).
19. Sergei V. Jargin , and . "Drugs and dietary supplements with unproven effects in research and practice: Part 2." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 10 (2019), 112-
128. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190314031843
20. Yang, G., Lucas, R., Caldwell, R., Yao, L., Romero, M., Caldwell, R.Novel mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes(2010) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 1 (2), pp. 59-63.
DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.64432
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
