Effectiveness of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in Handling Corruption Crime in Indonesia

Authors

  • Rr. Dijan Widijowati Jayabaya University, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Bambang Hartono Jayabaya University, Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/yarq1f49

Keywords:

Effectiveness, KPK, Corruption

Abstract

The effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia is not a new issue. Corruption is an extraordinary crime and also a crime against humanity, therefore corruption is a special concern for the country. The hopes of the Indonesian people to live in a country free of corruption are largely dependent on the Corruption Eradication Commission. The purpose of this study is to explore how efficiently the KPK is handling corruption cases in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative juridical analysis method research method, which is a research method that starts from the norms, principles and regulations that exist as positive legal norms which are then analyzed qualitatively. Problem formulation discussed 1. How is the effectiveness of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in dealing with corruption. 2. What are the efforts made to optimize corruption eradication. The strategy taken so that the Corruption Eradication Commission can carry out its duties effectively is to make the Corruption Eradication Commission as a guardian of good governance that is independent and independent.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Muhammad Azhar, “Anticorruption Education”, Yogyakarta: LP3 UMY - Partnership Among the Religious Coalition for Anti-Corruption, 2003).

2. Samuel Huntington, “Political Order in Changing Societies”, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968.

3. Anne Peter, “Corruption as a Violation of International Human Right”, European Journal of International Law, Volume 28, Issue 4, November 2018.

4. Philippa Webb, “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption : Global Achievement or Missed Opportunity”, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume8, Issue 1, March 2005

5. Team, “Corruption and Human Rights in India”, Law Time Journal – May 3, 2019.

6. Soerjono Soekanto, “Introduction to Legal Research”, Jakarta: UI-Press, 1999.

7. Lexy J. Moleong, “Qualitative Research Methodology”, Bandung: Youth Rosdakarya, 2005.

8. JR Raco, “Qualitative Research Methods - Types, Characteristics and Advantages”, Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2010.

9. Enste, Dominik; Heldman, Christina, “Causes and Consequences of Corruption : An Overview of Empirical Results, IW-Report, No.2/2017.

10. Ravindran, Rajesh Babu, The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Critical Overview (March 1, 2006).

11. United Nations, “Treaty Series”, Vol. 2349. No. 42146.

12. Lawrence M. Friedman, “Hukum Amerika : Sebuah Pengantar”, Jakarta : Tatanusa, 2001.

13. Arfan Faiz Muhlizi, “Bantuan Hukum melalui Mekanisme Nonlitigasi sebagai Saluran Penguatan Peradilan Informal bagi Masyarakat Adat”, Jurnal Rechtvinding Vol. 2 No, 1, 2013.

14. Komisi Obdudsman Nasional, “Ombudsman Indonesia Masa Lalu, Masa Sekarang dan Masa Mendatang”, Jakarta, Komisi Obudsman, 2002.

15. Romli Atmasasmita, “Pengantar Hukum Kejahatan Bisnis”, Jakarta : Prenada Media, 2003.

16. I Ketut Serigig, “Preventing the Acts of Corruption through Legal Community Education”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2018 ; 9 (2), 138-159.

17. Masoud, Shiravand, Rezapour Maryam, Rezapour Sadegh, Mardani Mahnaz, and Bahmani Mahmoud. "A Review of Medicinal Plants Affecting Exercise and Physical Health Factors in Athletes." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 10 (2019), 212-225. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190821081803

18. Nag, T., Ghosh, A. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in Asian Indian population: A systematic review(2013) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 4 (4), pp. 222-228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcdr.2014.01.004

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 8 (2020): 24 (8) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Widijowati, D., & Hartono, B. (2020). Effectiveness of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in Handling Corruption Crime in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.61841/yarq1f49