Recent Research Trends and Advancements in Computational Linguistics

Authors

  • R. Ganesan Professor, Department of English, Kongu Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India Author
  • M. Thangamani Assistant Professor, Department of CT-UG, Kongu Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India, Author
  • S. Jafar Ali Ibrahim Research Scholar, Department of CSE, Kongu Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/0pa21598

Keywords:

Computational Linguistics, HPSG, Voice Based CL Systems, AI in Computational Linguistics.

Abstract

AI and machine learning change everything about computing. Innovations in the processing of natural languages change everything about interaction between human computers. Some of these developments have become possible due to ground—breaking natural language processing work. The scientific study of language from a machine viewpoint is ascribed as computational linguistics (CL). CL's computer work focuses on natural language modelling and is based on computing and artificial intelligence. The goal of machine linguistics is to build software to interpret the natural language that we use to interact in everyday life. Scientists in the field of Informatics have been faced with interactions between people and equipment. The rapid and exponential growth of regimented knowledge such as records, databases and social media has rendered it even more important to predict the future of digital linguistics. In fact, the capacity of the providers to use whatever information available for tactical insight and decision making can be improved significantly by human and machine connectivity. We also addressed global trends and advances in machine linguistics in this research article.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kay, Martin. 1973. The MIND system. In R. Rustin (ed.), Courant Computer Science Symposium 8: natural language processing. Algorithmics Press.

2. Zwicky, Arnold M., Joyce Friedman, Barbara C. Hall & Donald E. Walker. 1965. The MITRE syntactic analysis procedure for Transformational Grammars. In Proceedings – FALL Joint Computer Conference, 317–326.

3. Petrick, Stanley Roy. 1965. A recognition procedure for Transformational Grammars. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Modern Languages dissertation.

4. Friedman, Joyce, Thomas H. Bredt, Robert W. Doran, Bary W. Pollack & Theodore S. Martner. 1971. A computer model of Transformational Grammar (Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Language Processing 9). New York: Elsevier.

5. Butt, Miriam, Tracy Holloway King, María-Eugenia Niño & Frédérique Segond. 1999. A grammar writer’s cookbook (CSLI Lecture Notes 95). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

6. Baldridge, Jason, Sudipta Chatterjee, Alexis Palmer & Ben Wing. 2007. Dot CCG and Vis CCG: Wiki and programming paradigms for improved grammar engineering with Open CCG. In Tracy Holloway King & Emily M. Bender (eds.), Grammar Engineering across Frameworks 2007 (Studies in Computational Linguistics ONLINE), 5–25. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

7. Ranta, Aarne. 2009. The GF resource grammar library. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT) 2. 1–62. http : / / journals . linguisticsociety . org /elanguage/lilt/article/download/214/214-501-1-PB.pdf.

8. King, Tracy Holloway. 2016. Theoretical linguistics and grammar engineering as mutually constraining disciplines. In Proceedings of the joint 2016 conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, 339–359. CSLI Publications.

9. Müller, Stefan. 2014. Kernigkeit: Anmerkungen zur Kern-Peripherie-Unterscheidung.In Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi(eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie (studia grammatica 76), 25–

39. Berlin: de Gruyter.

10. Bolshakov and Gelbukh (2004) Computational Linguistics: Models, Resources and Applications.

11. McCarthy 1990, 2000 and elsewhere, an useful link is http://www- formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcc59.html

12. http://www.cyc.com/cyc/technology/whitepapers_dir/Cyc_Architecture_and_API.pdf

13. Jargin, Sergei V, and . 2019. Drugs and dietary supplements with unproven effects in research and practice. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 10 (1), 27-37. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20181223075028

14. Buch, N., Goyal, J., Kumar, N., Parmar, I., Shah, V., Charan, J.Prevalence of hypertension in school going children of Surat city, Western India(2011) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 2 (4), pp. 228-232. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.89807

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 8 (2020): 24 (8) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Ganesan, R., Thangamani, M., & Ibrahim, S. J. A. (2020). Recent Research Trends and Advancements in Computational Linguistics. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 1154-1162. https://doi.org/10.61841/0pa21598