ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TEAM-BUILDING CAPACITY AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/whrhrz82Keywords:
Trust, Teaching, Organizational, RelationsAbstract
This study was an investigation of the organizational trust of faculty members of a university in the Philippines and its relationship to their team building capacity and teaching effectiveness. It uses a quantitative design utilizing the descriptive-correlational method. The respondents of this study were dominantly female, in their middle adulthood and master’s degree holders. Their average length of service in the university is almost two decades. The study concludes that the university under study has a promising instructional staff imbued with high level of organizational trust, team building capacity and teaching effectiveness. Altogether, they exhibit positive attitude such as high morale, effective task performance and a clear relevance to the university as they work interdependently, are committed to common goals, and produce very good instructional performance. The study has proven that a major factor that influences the team building capacity of the faculty members is their organizational trust. This shows that there is indeed a positive or direct relationship between organizational trust and team building capacity. However, the study disproves some studies claiming the direct relationship between organizational trust and teaching effectiveness. Interestingly, the only demographic variable that influences organizational trust of teachers is their length of service. But with respect to teaching effectiveness, the study concludes that sex, age, and educational attainment of teachers are factors that influence teachers’ level of teaching effectiveness. Essentially, male, young and those with lower educational attainment are teachers who have higher teaching effectiveness. Finally, the study has demonstrated that team building capacity is not influenced or has no positive relations with the teachers’ sex, age, educational attainment, academic rank and length of service.
Downloads
References
1. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., Gilbert, N. L., 2006. “Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: Implications for Job Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 464-482.
2. Celep C, Yilmazturk OE. (2012) The Relationship among Organizational Trust, Multidimensional Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Support in Educational Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;46(0):5763-76.
3. Colquitt J. A., B. A. Scott, and J. A. LePine, “Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, 2007, pp. 909-927.
4. Cook, J., Wall, T., 2010. “New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Nonfulfilment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, pp. 39-52.
5. Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., Berman, J. J., 2008. “A Multi-Dimensional Study of Trust in Organizations”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 10, pp. 303-317.
6. Dirks, K. T. and Ferrin, D. L. (2012). “Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
7. Hurst, D. K., 2004. “Of Boxes, Bubbles, and Effective Management”, Harvard Business Review, 62, pp. 78-88.
8. Islamoğlu, G., Birsel, M., Börü, D., 2007. “Kurum İçinde Güven”, İnkılap Yayınları, İstanbul.
9. K. Van den Bos, H.A. Wilke, and E.A. Lind, “When Do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75, 2008, pp. 1449-1458.
10. La Porta, R., Lozez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 2007. “Trust in Large Organizations”, American Economic Review, 87, pp. 333-338.
11. Lane, C. 2008. ‘Introduction: Theories and Issues in the Study of Trust.’ In Trust within and between Organizations, Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications, edited by C. Lan, and R. Bachman, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press
12. Lee, D., and A. D. Stajkovic. 2005. Interpersonal trust and emotion as predictors of cooperation in work teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Honolulu, hi, August 5–10.
13. Porter, T. W., Lilly, B. S., 2006. “The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, pp. 361- 376.
14. R. Galford and A. Seibold Drapeau, The Trusted Leader: Bringing Out the Best in Your People and Your Company, The Free Press, 2002.
15. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., 2008. “When do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 1449-1458.
16. Zand, D. E., 2012. “Trust and Managerial Problem Solving”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp. 229-239.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
