Genesis of the Formation of the Concept of Personal Freedom of Citizens: Historical and Legal Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/mmra6r50Keywords:
genesis, formation, concept, personal, freedom, citizens, historical, legal, aspectsAbstract
Consideration of the problem of ensuring personal freedom of citizens involves the study of many issues related, firstly, to the definition of the very concept of personal freedom of citizens from the perspective of philosophy and secondly, an analysis of the legal significance of this institution of the social structure of society. The problem seems to be quite global, and the large volume of research related to ensuring personal freedom of citizens, the state formulation of such issues, the constitutional consolidation of the basic tenets of a democratic state related to the definition of an individual citizen as well as his legal rights and interests as the main value of society are confirmation of this, including the right to personal freedom, the right to free choice of occupation.
Defining the concept of personal freedom, personality, personal security and basic measures to ensure it, I would also like to touch on the philosophical aspect of the problem, since, as it seems to us, it would be wrong to leave this side of the issue untouched, since in many ways the development of problems of a legal level requires its own philosophical justification.
Downloads
References
1. Herzen A.I. Russian people and socialism. Collected M.1962. v.7.p 318.
2. Aristotle. Politics.M. 1997 p. 208.
3. Hobbes T. "Leviathan." Elected Prod. M 1965. v.2. p.155
4. A.N. Golovistikova, L.Yu. Gruditsyna. Human rights. p.27.
5. A.N. Golovistikova, L.Yu. Gruditsyna. Human rights. p. 139.
6. Abdulaev M.I. Human rights. SPb., 1998.
7. Abdulaev M.I. Theory of State and Law: A Training Manual. M., 2004.
8. Abdulaev M.I. Human rights and the law. SPb., 2004.
9. Abdulgamidova N.A. The sphere of culture and religion: problems of interaction // Materials of the Republican Scientific and Practical Conference October 27, 2000, Makhachkala, 2002.
10. Butkevich V.G. Correlation of domestic and international law. Kiev, 1981.
11. Valeev P.M. International control. Kazan, 1998.
12. Valeev P.M. Control in modern international law. Kazan, 2001.
13. Hallam H. View of the State of Europe During the Middle Ages. New ed. Vol.11. L„ 1878.
14. Howard D.A. The Road from Rurinymede: Magna Carta and Constitutionalism in America. Charlottesville, 1968.
15. Internati onal Court of Justice. Yearbook 1996-1997. The Hague, 1997.
16. Cassirer Ernst. Logos, Dike, Kosmos in der Entwicklung. Goteborg, 1941.
17. La Martin Historie la Turguie. V. 2. Paris, 1854
18. Sabine G. H. History of Political Theory. N. Y., 1937.
19. United Nations Action in the Field of Human Rights. New York, 1980.
20. Revnova M.B. The doctrine of the individual, society and the state in the Russian philosophy of law (historical and legal research): Dis. Cand. law sciences. Kolomna, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
