PREVALENCE OF FREQUENCY OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING EXTRACTION FOR ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT - AN INSTITUTIONAL BASED RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Firdus Fareen H. Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India Author
  • Srirengalakshmi Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/fxxx4418

Keywords:

Esthetic concepts, Extraction, Occlusion, Orthodontics

Abstract

Extraction of permanent teeth as a part of orthodontic treatment has been the topic of discussion for many years, including periods when it was widely used in treatment, including the present, during which other methods are used to avoid dental extractions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of patients undergoing extraction for orthodontic treatment at Private dental college. The clinical records of 987 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The frequency of extractions was evaluated with regard to sex, gender and the different combinations of extractions was assesed. Chi-square test was used to determine correlations between variables, while the chi-square test for trends was used to assess the frequency of extractions. The most frequently extracted teeth were first premolars. There was a statistically significant differences seen in patients undergoing extraction for orthodontic treatment with regard to age. New features introduced into the orthodontic clinic and new esthetic concepts contributed to reducing the number of cases treated with dental extractions. However, dental extractions for orthodontic treatments are still well indicated in certain cases. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Robb SI, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment

in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114:383–6.

[2] Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without

extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97:45–51.

[3] Strang RHW, Thompson WM. A textbook of orthodontia. Lea & Febiger; 1958.

[4] Neger M. The local use of sulfathiazole in the treatment of tooth extraction wounds. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1942;28:C43–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0096-6347(42)90561-1.

[5] Peck S, Peck H. Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 76:491–6.

[6] Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod

Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96:462–6.

[7] Samantha C, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Sivamurthy G, Dinesh S. Comparative Evaluation of Two BisGMA Based Orthodontic Bonding Adhesives - A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC40–4.

[8] Samantha C. Comparative Evaluation of Two Bis-GMA Based Orthodontic Bonding Adhesives - A

Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal Of Clinical And Diagnostic Research 2017.

https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/16716.9665.

[9] Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction - A case report. Saudi Dent J 2017;29:185–93.

[10] Felicita AS. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor - The slingshot

method. Saudi Dent J 2018;30:265–9.

[11] Dinesh SPS, Arun AV, Sundari KKS, Samantha C, Ambika K. An indigenously designed apparatus for

measuring orthodontic force. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2623–6.

[12] Ramesh Kumar KR, Shanta Sundari KK, Venkatesan A, Chandrasekar S. Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study. Am J Orthod

Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:479–85.

[13] Jain RK, Kumar SP, Manjula WS. Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini

implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC21–4.

[14] Kamisetty SK, Verma JK, Arun, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Kumar A. SBS vs Inhouse Recycling

Methods-And Invitro Evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC04–8.

[15] Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion-- a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod 2016;17:4.

[16] Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Shantha Sundari KK. Determination of craniofacial relation among the

subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation). Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:305–12.

[17] Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dental Press J Orthod 2017;22:47–55.

[18] Krishnan S, Pandian S, Kumar S A. Effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement-an update. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZE01–5.

[19] Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball Headed Mini Implant. J Clin

Diagn Res 2017;11:ZL02–3.

[20] Viswanath A, Ramamurthy J, Dinesh SPS, Srinivas A. Obstructive sleep apnea: awakening the hidden

truth. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:1–7.

[21] Rubika J, Sumathi Felicita A, Sivambiga V. Gonial Angle as an Indicator for the Prediction of Growth

Pattern. World Journal of Dentistry 2015;6:161–3. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1334.

[22] Salzmann JA. An evaluation of extraction in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1965;51:928–9.

[23] Brandt S, Safirstein GR. Different extractions for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1975;68:15–41.

[24] Kumari L, Nayan K. Begg’s Technique. Walnut Publication; 2019.

[25] Riedel RA. An analysis of dentofacial relationships. American Journal of Orthodontics 1957;43:103–19.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(57)90220-8.

[26] Janson G, Maria FRT, Bombonatti R. Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in

orthodontic treatment during 35 years. Prog Orthod 2014;15:51.

[27] Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica

fragrans extract . Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019 ;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020): 24 (1) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

H., F. F., & Srirengalakshmi. (2020). PREVALENCE OF FREQUENCY OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING EXTRACTION FOR ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT - AN INSTITUTIONAL BASED RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 7039-7045. https://doi.org/10.61841/fxxx4418