Improving Islamic Elementary Students’ Reading Comprehension Skill through Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review (SQ3R) Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/g2ztqc32Keywords:
SQ3R, Reading Comprehension, Metacognitive Strategy, Elementary School.Abstract
Comprehending text is the final goal of reading. To comprehend the text, learners can use many strategies based on the purposes of the learning process. This article examines Islamic elementary reading comprehension through SQ3R strategy, how this strategy can increase learners’ reading skills. The method used is qualitative action research to know the process and solving the students’ problems while learning the process of reading. The researcher uses both qualitative and quantitative data through direct observation in the natural environment. The result shows that the SQ3R strategy can increase learners’ reading comprehension problems. It can be seen that learners can analyze the visual information, predict the content and improve their note-taking.
Downloads
References
[1] K. Nation, “Children’s reading comprehension difficulties,” Sci. Read. A Handb., pp. 248–265, 2005.
[2] J. Sabatini, Z. Wang, and T. O’Reilly, “Relating reading comprehension to oral reading performance in the NAEP fourth-grade special study of oral reading,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 253–271, 2019, doi: 10.1002/rrq.226.
[3] I. N. Aziz, “Developing English Reading Book For College Students of INKAFA Based on Monitoring Strategy,” JALIE; J. Appl. Linguist. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 279–304, 2019.
[4] F. R. Vellutino, “Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehension in elementary school children,” Rethink. Read. Compr., pp. 51–81, 2003.
[5] N. R. P. (US), N. I. of C. Health, H. D. (US), N. R. E. Initiative, N. I. for L. (US), and U. S. D. of Health, Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National …, 2000.
[6] H. Van Keer and J. P. Verhaeghe, “Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 73, no. 4,
pp. 291–329, 2005.
[7] S. Allen, “An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction,” IRAL, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 319–338, 2003.
[8] F. Antoniou and E. Souvignier, “Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities,” Learn. Disabil. A Contemp. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2007.
[9] Y. C. Jian, “Fourth Graders’ Cognitive Processes and Learning Strategies for Reading Illustrated Biology Texts: Eye Movement Measurements,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 93–109, 2016, doi: 10.1002/rrq.125.
[10] Y. Yang, “Reassessing Readers ’ Comprehension Monitoring,” Read. a Foreign Lang., vol. 14, no. 1, 2002.
[11] M. Taub and R. Azevedo, “Using Sequence Mining to Analyze Metacognitive Monitoring and Scientific Inquiry based on Levels of Efficiency and Emotions during Game-Based Learning,” J. Educ. Data Min., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2018.
[12] L. Zhang and S. Seepho, “Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context.,” Electron. J. Foreign Lang. Teach., vol. 10, no. 1, 2013.
[13] F. Kana, “A Multivariate Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies,” Int. J. Res. Teach. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 72–83, 2015.
[14] R. C. Feldt and R. Hensley, “Recommendations for use of SQ3R in introductory psychology textbooks,”
Education, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 584–589, 2009.
[15] D. J. Gustafson and J. E. Pederson, “SQ3R: Surveying and Questioning the Relevant, Recent (and Not So Recent) Research.,” 1985.
[16] M. Y. Lisson and K. K. Wixson, Assessment and instruction of reading disability: An interactive approach. Harper Collins Publications, New York, 1991.
[17] A. B. Artis, “Improving marketing students’ reading comprehension with the SQ3R method,” J. Mark. Educ., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2008.
[18] S. T. Swennumson, “The effect of the SQ3R study method on reading comprehension of nontraditional college students.,” 1993.
[19] L. H. Eilers and C. Pinkley, “Metacognitive strategies help students to comprehend all text,” Read. Improv., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 13–30, 2006.
[20] A. A. M. Houtveen and W. Van de Grift, “Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction and instruction time on reading comprehension,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 173–190, 2007.
[21] T. D. Scharlach, “START comprehending: Students and teachers actively reading text,” Read. Teach., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 2008.
[22] H. Van Keer, “Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 37–70, 2004.
[23] K. Lau, “Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think‐aloud study,” J. Res. Read.,
vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 383–399, 2006.
[24] T. H. Butler, “Effect of subject and training variables on the SQ3R study method.” Arizona State University, 1983.
[25] S. Fisher, “The effect of a study strategy, SQ3R, on the ability of fifth-grade students to read a social studies textbook,” 1985.
[26] A. G. Paporello, “SQ3R: A Must for Teaching Science Concepts to Sixth Graders?.,” 1991.
[27] F. P. Robinson, “Effective study, Rev,” 1946.
[28] M. Y. Lipson and K. K. Wixson, Assessment and instruction of reading and writing difficulty: An interactive approach. Allyn and Bacon Boston, 2003.
[29] F. P. Robinson, Effective reading. Harper & Row, 1962.
[30] S. R. C. Gibson, “A Study Into the Effect of SQ3R with Cooperative Learning on the Reading Progress of Student Nurses.” Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, 2018.
[31] J. L. Johns and L. P. McNamara, “The SQ3R study technique: A forgotten research target,” J. Read., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 705–708, 1980.
[32] J. F. Calhoun and J. R. Acocella, Psychology of adjustment and human relationships. Random House, 1983.
[33] A. Sobour, “Psikologi Umum dalam Lintasan Sejarah,” Bandung CV Pustaka Setia, 2003.
[34] A. Muhid, E. R. Amalia, H. Hilaliyah, N. Budiana, and M. B. N. Wajdi, “The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies Implementation on Students ’ Reading Comprehension Achievement,” vol. 13, no. 2, 2020.
[35] C. Carter and J. L. Bishop, Keys to Effective Llearning: Developing Powerful Habitas of Mind, no. 378.170281 C377K. 2005.
[36] W. M. Beneke and M. B. Harris, “Teaching self-control of study behavior,” Behav. Res. Ther., vol. 10, no. 1,
pp. 35–41, 1972.
[37] R. D. Briggs, D. J. Tosi, and R. M. Morley, “Study habit modification and its effect on academic performance: A behavioral approach,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 347–350, 1971.
[38] J. L. Driskell and E. L. Kelly, “A guided notetaking and study skills system for use with university freshmen predicted to fail,” J. Read., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 327–331, 1980.
[39] J. E. Herman, “The Effect of a Reading Improvement Program Upon Academic Achievement in College.,” 1972.
[40] A. Al-Ghazo, “The Effect of SQ3R and Semantic Mapping Strategies on Reading Comprehension Learning among Jordanian University Students,” English Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 92–106, 2015.
[41] M. Basar and M. Gürbüz, “Effect of the SQ4R Technique on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary School 4th Grade Elementary School Students.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 131–144, 2017.
[42] A. Bulut, “Improving 4th Grade Primary School Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills.,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2017.
[43] M. Yang and K. Kim, “The effects of SQ3R instruction on learners’ self-efficacy and reading ability in college academic reading,” 외국어교육, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 27–49, 2016.
[44] A. G. Marzuki, “The Implementation of SQ3R Method to Develop Students’ Reading Skill on Islamic Texts
in EFL Class in Indonesia,” Regist. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2019.
[45] A. Asiri and M. M. Momani, “The Effectiveness of Using SQ3R to teach Reading Skills,” Asian J. Educ. Res. Vol, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.
[46] S. Taki, “Metacognitive online reading strategy use : Readers ’ perceptions in L1 and L2,” J. Res. Read., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–19, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12048.
[47] R. Taraban, M. Kerr, and K. Rynearson, “Analitic and Pragmatic Factors in College Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategies,” Read. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 67–81, 2004.
[48] W. L. Chung, L. Jarmulowicz, and G. M. Bidelman, “Auditory processing, linguistic prosody awareness, and word reading in Mandarin-speaking children learning English,” Read. Writ., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1407– 1429, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9730-8.
[49] D. Moshman, “Metacognitive Theories Revisited,” Educ Psychol Rev, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10648-017- 9413-7.
[50] I. G. N. Pujawan, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Metode SQ3R Dalam Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja, no. 3, pp. 343–358, 2005.
[51] E. Ferrance, “Themes in education: Action research,” Brown Univ. Educ. Alliance, vol. 34, no. 1, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
