Psychodynamic of Forest Conserving Behavior in Muria Forest Community

Authors

  • Mochamad Widjanarko Faculty of Psychology Muria Kudus University, Author
  • Suryanto Psychology Program University of Airlangga Author
  • Mustain x Mashud Sociology Program University of Airlangga Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/knwas139

Keywords:

field theory, ecological behavior, integrated ecological behavior

Abstract

Muria Mountains that extends into Kudus, Jepara and Pati districts have a primary function as a buffer for plant and wildlife ecosystems. It also effects the Muria forest’s people living because it is the clean water supply for the surrounding area. This study aims to analyze and discover the psychodynamic of forest conserving behavior in Muria forest community. This research uses qualitative approach with grounded theory. There were seven informants involved in this study. The researcher uses in-depth interviews and observations in the process of extracting data and analyzing. The integrated ecological behavior model, that is based on the combination of Kurt Lewin field theory and Kaiser's ecological behavior, is a research finding which can examine the psychodynamic of forest conserving behavior in Muria forest community. It is based on the informants’ expectation in maintaining the Muria forest as a sense of responsibility for Muria's damage, so that it brings environmental values to maintain the Muria forest. Besides, there is an awareness on the need of water for farmer based on the knowledge of the informant in maintaining the Muria forest, the emergence of encouragement to maintain the Muria forest after the disaster and barrier in conserving the Muria forest. It is undeniable that there is an economic need that encourages informants in maintaining the Muria forest and conserving the Muria forest from others and related to the land ownership which is part of the responsibility of maintaining the Muria forest. At last, the emergence of caring for the Muria forest becomes an environmental value.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Axelrod, L.J., & Lehman, D.R. (1993). Responding to environmental concern: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13,149-159.

[2] Brigham, J.C. (1991). Social Psychology. Second Edition. USA: Harper Collins Publisher, Inc.

[3] Costanso.R.P and Shaw.E.M. (1982). Theories of Social Psychology.New York: McGraw hill Book. Co.

[4] Farhati, F., (1995). Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes to the Environment. Social Case Study Report.

Yogyakarta: Faculty of Psychology UGM

[5] Faturochman & Himam, F. (1995). Community environmental insight in industrial areas. Journal of Psychology Gajah Mada University No. 1, 31-40.

[6] Frankl, V. E. (2006). Logotherapy for Psychological Therapy through the Meaning of Existence. Yogyakarta:

Kreasi Wacana

[7] Kaiser, E.G; Ranney, M ; Hartig, T; Bowler, A.P. (1999).Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feeling of responsibility for the environment. Europen Psychologist, Vol.4, No.2, June.

[8] Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T.A. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology,19.234-253.

[9] Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing, S.; Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology,19,1-19.

[10] Khasan, M . (2015). Territorial Behavior of Water Users in Colo Village, Kudus Regency. Thesis. Master of Psychology, Postgraduate Program of Soegijapranata Catholic University. (unpublished).

[11] MRC Indonesia. Report of the 2015 Annual Activity Program. Kudus: Muria Research Center (MRC) Indonesia

[12] Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment & Behavior, 26,239-260.

[13] Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (2003). Basics of Qualitative Research: Steps and Grounded Theory Techniques

(Translation). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

[14] Thompson , S.C., Cagnon., Barton, M.A, (1994). Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes Toward the Environment, Journal of Environment Psychology, 14, 149-157

[15] Widjanarko, M. (2006). Behavioral Change Phenomena: Case Studies on Communities in Muria Mountain Area,, Kudus Regency. Research Report (unpublished). Jakarta: Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education No 181/SP3/PP/DP2M/II/2006

[16] Widjanarko, M. (2008). The Community Role to Maintain Environmental Wisdom in Muria Mountain Area. Thesis. Semarang: Master of Psychology Science, Postgraduate Program at Soegijapranata Catholic University. (unpublished).

[17] Widjanarko, M. & Nugroho, A. (2010). Risk and Vulnerability Assessment of The Disaster Risk Reduction Policy in Muria Mountain Area. Research Report (unpublished). Salatiga: The Muria Coalition & Dutch ICCO.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Widjanarko, M., Suryanto, & Mashud, M. x. (2020). Psychodynamic of Forest Conserving Behavior in Muria Forest Community. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 5755-5763. https://doi.org/10.61841/knwas139