Neo-Colonization of Electoral Politics: Evidence from Hybrid Regime, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b07kze72Keywords:
Hybrid democracy, Neo-colonization, Urbanization, Hegemonic power, DialecticsAbstract
The electoral politics is changing with dynamic interplay of electoral rhetoric, slogans and manifestoes under the influence of neo-liberal norms. The encompassing role of neo-liberal norms tend to facilitate hegemonic power dominance. In hybrid democracy Pakistan, military has been constantly pushing itself for achieving hegemonic power status to influence several policy preferences. These preferences are propagated through different political channels like policy preferences of political parties by formulating voter choices at different stages. The militarized hegemonic apparatus applies various strategies to consolidate political hegemony as manifestation of neo-colonization. The militarized hegemonic power structure tends to take firm control into economic field through covert facilitation of specific ‘political party’ as democratic smokescreen/façade. Political system laminated by ideology (Religion) is used to legitimize control of material conditions in the larger interest of hegemonic power structure. The rapid transmutation of mass opinion manufacturing through cyber means by information corporatized production have become effective tools. Therefore, contemporary political environment offers altogether different political resources to the military leaders of colonizing the political system by favoring one and constraining rest of political machines or parties. Thus, the structural shift of urbanization pushed commercialization that led to advanced form of capital accumulation produces adverse effects on the subordinate masses. The recent electoral event 2018 saw that high middle class and low-income groups got pushed into electoral rhetoric through populist notion ‘change’ by newly formed political vehicle Pakistan Tehreek i Insaf (PTI). Thereby, the concept of duality in dialectical contradiction and unity have become permanent feature of electoral politics in hybrid regime like Pakistan. Thereby finally, the electoral history shows several examples of governmental power under control of covert hegemonic actors as instruments of neo- colonization of electoral politics.
Downloads
References
[1] Alfred C. Stepan, The state and society: Peru in comparative perspective. Princeton University Press, 2015.
[2] Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha, "Power, perks, prestige and privileges: the military’s economic activities in Pakistan." In The military as an economic actor, pp. 124-142. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2003. Siddiqa, Ayesha. Military Inc.: inside Pakistan’s military economy. Penguin Random House India, 2017. [3]Brömmelhörster, Jörn, and W. Paes, eds. The military as an economic actor: Soldiers in business. Springer, 2003.
[4] Claus. Offe, "Structural Problems of the Capitalist State: Class rule and the political system. On the selectiveness of political institutions." The State. Critical Concepts. London: Routledge (1994): 104-129.
[5] Donna J. Guy, Creating Charismatic Bonds in Argentina: Letters to Juan and Eva Perón. University of New Mexico Press, 2016.
[6] Eric A. Nordlinger, Soldiers in politics: military coups and governments. Prentice Hall, 1977.
[7] Erica Nancy Stepan, Scientific Institution-building in a Developing Country: the Oswaldo Cruz Institute of Brazil: Los Angeles, 1971. University Microfilms, 1972.
[7] Holli A., Semetko, Jay G. Blumler, Michael Gurevitch, David H. Weaver, and Steve Barkin. The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis of party and media roles in recent American and British elections. Routledge, 2013.
[8] James B. Mayfield, Rural politics in Nasser's Egypt: a quest for legitimacy. University of Texas Press, 2014.
[9] Linz, Juan José, and Juan J. Linz. Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000.
[10] Piliavsky, Anastasia, ed. Patronage as politics in South Asia. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[11] Steven Levitsky, and Lucan A. Way. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[12] Adegboye Adeyanju, "Symbols and Not Manifestoes Are the Selling Point Here: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Contemporary Nigerian Political Parties' Images and Slogans." In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies. IGI Global, 2016.
[13] Adil Khan, and Ghulam Mustafa. "Pakistan’s 3 rd Military Adventure: Consolidating Authoritarianism." Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences 5, no. 4 (2014): 654-682.
[14] Alex Weingrod, "Patrons, patronage, and political parties." Comparative studies in Society and History 10, no. 4 (1968): 377-400.
[15] Alfred Stepan, Linz, Juan José, and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. The breakdown of democratic regimes. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
[16] Anatol Lieven,. "All Kayani's men." The National Interest 107 (2010): 58-65. Musharraf, Gen Retd Pervez. "Who is on Trial?”.
[17] Andrew C. Janos, "From eastern empire to western hegemony: East Central Europe under two international regimes." East European Politics and Societies 15, no. 2 (2001): 221-249.
[18] Ayesha Siddiqa, Where Armies Rule, New York Times, July 16, 2013.
[19] Ayesha. Siddiqa, "Pakistan—From Hybrid-Democracy to Hybrid-Martial Law." Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 42, no. 2 (2019): 52-72.
[20] Ayyaz Mallick, "Beyond “Domination without Hegemony”: passive revolution (s) in Pakistan." Studies in Political Economy 98, no. 3 (2017): 239-262.
[21] Beatriz Magaloni, and Ruth Kricheli. "Political order and one-party rule." Annual review of political science 13 (2010): 123-143. Gerschewski, Johannes. "The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes." Democratization 20, no. 1 (2013): 13-38.
[22] Bruce Grelle, “Hegemony and the universalization of moral ideas: Gramsci's importance for comparative religious ethics." Soundings (1995): 519-540.
[23] Chung Hee Park, Major Speeches by Korea's Park Chung Hee. Vol. 3. Seoul: Hollym Corporation, 1970.
[24] Dai-kwon Choi, " Law and development: The Korean experience." Law and Society in Korea (2013) 3.
[25] Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, "Poverty, inequality, and populist politics in Iran." The Journal of Economic Inequality 7, no. 1 (2009): 5-28.
[26] Donald V. Kurtz, "Hegemony and anthropology: Gramsci, exegeses, reinterpretations." Critique of anthropology 16, no. 2 (1996): 103-135.
[27] Duncan McCargo, “Elite governance: business, bureaucrats and the military." Governance in the Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge/Open University (1998): 126-49.
[28] Frederic Grare, "Political dimensions of police reform in Pakistan." Policy Outlook (2010).
[29] Flavia Freidenberg, and Steven Levitsky. "Informal institutions and party organization in Latin America." Informal institutions and democracy. Lessons from Latin America (2006): 178-197.
[30] George Lakoff, Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press, 2010.
[31] Hassan Javid, “Class, power, and patronage: the landed elite and politics in Pakistani Punjab." PhD diss., The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2012. Mallick, Ayyaz. "Beyond Domination without Hegemony”: passive revolution (s) in Pakistan." Studies in Political Economy 98, no. 3 (2017): 239-262.
[32] Herbert Kitschelt, and Steven I. Wilkinson. "Citizen-politician linkages: an introduction." Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition (2007): 1-49.
[33] Henry Krips, "Interpellation, Populism, and Perversion: Althusser, Laclau and Lacan." Filozofski vestnik 27, no. 2 (2007).
[34] Jaromir Štěpán,"Some problems of system identification." Kybernetika 7, no. 2 (1971): 133-155.
[35] Jawad Tariq, Ahmed Usman, and Amal Sajjad. "Politics of defection in struggling democracies." Pakistan Perspectives 20, no. 1 (2015): 117
[36] John Storey, "Matthew Arnold: The politics of an organic intellectual." Literature and History 11, no. 2 (1985): 217.
[37] John H. Gill, "Provocation, war and restraint under the nuclear shadow: The Kargil conflict 1999." Journal of Strategic Studies 42, no. 5 (2019): 701-726. AFGAN, BRIGADIER SHER. "From Kargil to the Coup." (2018).
[38] Joshua D. Clinton, and David E. Lewis. "Expert opinion, agency characteristics, and agency preferences." Political Analysis 16, no. 1 (2008): 3-20.
[39] John G. Matsusaka, and Nolan M. McCarty. "Political resource allocation: Benefits and costs of voter initiatives." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17, no. 2 (2001): 413-448.
[40] Karl Loxbo, "The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party." Party Politics 19, no. 4 (2013): 537-554.
[41] Kazem Alamdari, "The Power Structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran: transition from populism to clientelism, and militarization of the government." Third World Quarterly 26, no. 8 (2005): 1285-1301.
[42] Kenneth M. Roberts, "Latin America's populist revival." SAIS Review of International Affairs 27, no. 1 (2007): 3-15
[43] Kempe Hope, Ronald. "Politics, bureaucratic corruption, and maladministration in the third world." International Review of Administrative Sciences 51, no. 1 (1985): 1-6.
[44] Lani. Guinier, "Beyond electocracy: Rethinking the political representative as powerful stranger." The Modern Law Review 71, no. 1 (2008): 1-35.
[45] Markus Prior, "News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout." American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 3 (2005): 577-592.
[46] Mattei Dogan, "Comparing two charismatic leaders: Ataturk and de Gaulle." Comparative sociology 6, no. 1-2 (2007): 75-84.
[47] Muhammad Shafiq, Razia Sultana, and Muhammad Munir. "Political Rhetoric; Slogan Politics in Pakistan and Role of Parliament." FWU Journal of Social Sciences 11, no. 2 (2017).
[47] Muhammad Suleman, “The rise of religious intolerance in the politics of Pakistan?" South Asia@ LSE (2018).
[48] Paul. Cammack, "Statism, new institutionalism, and Marxism." Socialist Register 26, no. 26 (1990).
[49] Rahul Menon, neoliberalism or neocolonialism? Evaluating neoliberalism as a policy prescription for convergence, developing economics, a critical perspective on development economics.
[50] Robert R. Kaufman and Barbara Stallings. "The political economy of Latin American populism." In The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America, pp. 15-43. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[51] Robert Bianchi,. "Interest group politics in the Third World." Third World Quarterly 8, no. 2 (1986): 507-539.
[52] Regina Smyth, Anna Lowry, and Brandon Wilkening. "Engineering victory: Institutional reform, informal institutions, and the formation of a hegemonic party regime in the Russian Federation." Post-Soviet Affairs 23, no. 2 (2007): 118-137.
[53] Reinhard Bendix, "Reflections on charismatic leadership." Asian Survey (1967): 341-352. Bendix, R., and S. Lipset.
"Social Stratification." (1967).
[54] Robert Springborg, "Economic involvements of militaries." International Journal of Middle East Studies 43, no. 3 (2011): 397-399. Sakhuja, Vijay. "PAKISTAN: NAVAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX." Green Consciousness Rising: The Coming Wars of Energy and Ecology (2004): 47.
[55] Salman Yousaf, “Political marketing in Pakistan: exaggerated promises, delusive claims, marketable development
projects and change advocacy." Journal of Public Affairs 16, no. 2 (2016): 140-155.
[56] Shaobo Xie, "Restaging World Literature in the Age of Neoliberalism/Neocolonialism." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20, no. 7 (2018): 2.
[57] Shawky Saad Zeidan, "Charismatic Leadership and Political Participation: The Case of Nasser's Egypt." Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 2, no. 2 (1978): 63.
[58] Sidney Tarrow, "Contentious politics." The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (2013).
[59] Sigmund Neumann, "Leadership: institutional and personal." The Journal of Politics 3, no. 2 (1941): 133-153.
[60] Sorpong Peou, "Cambodia: A hegemonic party system in the making." In Political Parties, Party Systems and Democratization in East Asia, pp. 79-105. 2011.
[61] Stanley G. Payne, "Franco, the Spanish Falange and the Institutionalisation of Mission." Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 7, no. 2 (2006): 191-201.
[62] Steve Ellner, "Political party factionalism and democracy in Venezuela." Latin American Perspectives 23, no. 3 (1996):
87-109
.
[63] Tahir Kamran, "Early phase of electoral politics in Pakistan: 1950s." South Asian Studies 24, no. 2 (2009)
[64] Daily Dawn Newspaper, Constitutional Amendments, June 17, 2010
[65] Thomas C Bruneau, "Controlling intelligence in new democracies." International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 14, no. 3 (2001): 323-341
[66] Van Biezen, Ingrid, and Petr Kopecký. "The state and the parties: public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies." Party politics 13, no. 2 (2007): 235-254
[67] Yunas Samad, "Elections and democratic transition in Pakistan: one step forward and two steps backwards." Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 55, no. 4 (2017): 509-530.
[68] Asad Liaquat, Michael Callen, Ali Cheema, Adnan Khan, Farooq Naseer, and Jacob N. Shapiro. "Political Connections and Vote Choice: Evidence from Pakistan." (2019).
[69] Yoram Gorlizki, "Too much trust: Regional party leaders and local political networks under Brezhnev." Slavic Review 69, no. 3 (2010): 676-700.
[70] Siegfried O. Wolf, "Imran Khan-a twist in the tale?." The Independent, April 19 (2013): 14-14. Kundi, Mansoor Akbar.
"Leadership Patterns in Pakistan." (2018).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
