Effectiveness of Interventional Rehabilitation Program on Swallowing Ability of Patients with Cerebrovascular Accident
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/xjwkb333Keywords:
CVA, effectiveness, swallowing abilityAbstract
Cerebrovascular disorders are a comprehensive term that refers to a central nervous system dysfunction (CNS) that occurs when normal blood flow to the brain is interrupted. Stroke is the primary cerebrovascular disorders in the United States and is the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer. According to the common recent WHO data released in 2017, CVA deaths in Iraq amounted to 14315, or 8.13% of all deaths. After CVA, difficulty swallowing is very common, affecting from 13 to 94 percent Acute CVA patients. A Study and Control Groups Pre-Test, Post-Test1and Post Test2 Quasi Experimental Design used to study the effect of Swallowing Method on Swallowing Ability of Patients with Cerebrovascular Accident, from the period of 1st. September 2019 to the September 2020. A non-probability (purposive sample) of (50) stroke patients are included in the study. The study conducted in Babylon City. 50Patients diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) selected through a non-probability accidental sample were included in the study. The study is conduct in Babylon City \ Morgan Medical City, Hilla Teaching Hospital, and Imam Sadiq Hospital. The data are collected by using questionnaire developed by the researchers to determine the effect of the Swallowing Method on Patients Swallowing Ability. Questionnaire which consists of three parts (1) Patients' Demographic data. (2) Patients' clinical data. (3) Swallowing ability scale (Gugging Swallowing Screen). validity of the study instrument achieved through a panel of expert. The data described statistically and analyzed through use of the descriptive and inferential statistical analysis procedures. The findings of the present study indicate that there is an improvement in the Post Test2 group Swallowing Ability compared with the Pre Test and Post Test1 group patients'. Result the study sample indicates that there is a relationship between the effectiveness of the program and the patient age, hemiplegia, hypertension, and ataxia, age 60 and over need a longer period to return to the normal condition compared to younger ages that need a shorter period, this study shows there is a significant relationship between the interventional program and age. In addition, this study shows there is a significant association between the interventional program and problems and hypertension and the highly significant association between the interventional program and problems or complications ataxia. Furthermore, the study sample indicates significant differences in the patients' swallowing ability (post-test 2) according to the presence of hemiplegia and ataxia. While there is a non-significant difference according to hypertension. But according to the statistical mean, the study findings indicate that the swallowing ability decreased as the patients suffer from these problems. The study concluded that the Swallowing method is an effective Swallowing Ability rehabilitation technique in improving the stroke patients' Swallowing Ability. The study recommends to an intensive comprehensive wide population-based (national level) studies could be conducted to determine the effectiveness of the nursing rehabilitation methods in improve the patients' health status and reduce the complications especially for patients with Cerebrovascular accident.
Downloads
References
1. AbdelHamid, A., & Abo-Hasseba, A. (2017). Application of the GUSS test on adult egyptian dysphagic patients. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 33(1), 103.
2. Arora, T., Mantur, P. G., Bidri, R. C., & Mulimani, M. S. (2018). Serum Uric Acid Levels and Serum Lipid .Levels in Patients with Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accident. Journal of The Association of Physicians of India, 66, 66.
3. Boaden, E., Doran, D., Burnell, J., Clegg, A., Dey, P., Hurley, M., ... & Watkins, C. (2017). Screening for
aspiration risk associated with dysphagia in acute stroke (diagnostic test accuracy protocol). Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews, 1-11.
4. Dehlendorff, C., Andersen, K. K., & Olsen, T. S. (2015). Sex disparities in stroke: women have more severe
strokes but better survival than men. Journal of the American Heart Association, 4(7), e001967.
5. Delphi Study. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal, 43(6), E35-E41.
6. Haloob, H.; Hamza, R.: Relationship between Self-care Activities and Self- Esteem among Patients with Stroke
at Middle Euphrates Neuroscience Center in Al-Najaf Al-Ashraf City, International Journal of Scientific and
Research Publications, (2016), Vol (6) 9. P.p. 530540.
7. Ministry of Health, Annual Report for the year, 2013, p. 146
8. Ministry of Health, Annual Report for the year, 2014, p. 166
9. Momosaki, R., Abo, M., & Kakuda, W. (2014). Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined
with intensive swallowing rehabilitation for chronic stroke dysphagia: a case series study. Case reports in
neurology, 6(1), 60-67.
10. Okawara, N., & Usuda, S.; Influences of visual and supporting surface conditions on standing postural control
and correlation with walking ability in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Journal of physical therapy science,
(2015), 27(5), 1323-1327.
11. Pendlebury, S. T., Rothwell, P. M., & Study, O. V. (2019). Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with
transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford Vascular Study. The Lancet
Neurology, 18(3), 248-258.
12. Sahathevan, R.; Linden, T.; Villemagne, V.; Churilov, L.; Ly, J.; Rowe, C.; Donnan, G.: Positron Emission
Tomographic Imaging in Stroke, Stroke, (2015), Vol (47), No (1), p.p. 113-119
13. Suter-Riederer, S., Imhof, R. M., Gabriel, C., Kesselring, J., Schnepp, W., & Imhof, L. (2018). Consenting on
Principles of Rehabilitation Nursing Care: A
14. Towfighi, A., & Saver, J. L. (2011). Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United
States: historical perspective and challenges ahead. Stroke, 42(8), 2351-2355.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.