The Implementation of Friedman's Theory in the Context of the Legal System in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n4exk788Keywords:
Indonesia, Legal Culture, Legal Structur, Legal Substance, Legal System.Abstract
Discussion of the legal system is a complex matter. It is because analyzing the legal system which is applied in a country is not enough just to look at it only from the surface where this is often stated by Indonesian legal scientists who only analyze the legal system only as a form and legal rules without looking at the background of these rules and their relation to society. Therefore, in this paper, it will be discussed comprehensively what and how the legal system in Indonesia runs especially after the reform which happened in 1998. Surely, this is by looking at the context and its implementation using the viewpoint of Lawrence M. Friedman's Theory. The reason for using this theory is because this theory looks at the legal system with a very comprehensive perspective, especially in the context of the legal system in Indonesia which has high complexity. The method used in this research is the normative legal method using Friedman's theory. The results of this study are that the legal system is interpreted as a process starting from what is done by legal institutions and how to implement it in the form of actual actions in a social system whose raw materials are from the community, process them and then produce an output that can be applied in society. Then there are three important points of view in examining the legal system in Indonesia, namely legal structure, legal culture, and legal substance that apply in this country.
Downloads
References
1. Adegbite, O. B., Oduniyi, O. O., & Farinde, J. A. (2019). Separation of Powers Under the 1999 Nigerian Constitution: The Core Legal Dilemmas. Sriwijaya Law Review, 3(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss2.281.pp235-252
2. Asshiddiqie, J. (1988). Telaah Kritis mengenai Perspektif Historis-Evolusioner dalam Studi Hukum dan Perkembangan Sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 18(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol18.no3.1266
3. Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Struktur Hukum dan Hukum Struktural Indonesia. In D. Fedrian, E. Faiz,
Hermansyah, Imran, & Suwantoro (Eds.), Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia (pp. 19– 44). Retrieved from https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/assets/uploads/files/bunga-rampai-2012- dialektika-pembaharuan-sistem-hukum-indonesia.pdf
4. Atmadja. (1984). Perundang-undangan Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 14(433–442). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol14.no5.1081
5. Bambang Sunggono. (1997). Metode Peneitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
6. Eekelaar, J. M. (1967). Splitting the Grundnorm. The Modern Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1967.tb01144.x
7. Farikhah, M. (2018). Rekonseptulisasi Judicial Pardon Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia Dengan Sistem Hukum Barat). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3), 556–588. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no3.1746
8. Fendri, A. (2011). Perbaikan Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Riau, 2(2), 1–20.
9. Friedman, L. M. (1969). Legal Culture and Social Development. Law & Society Review, 4(1), 29–
44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052760
10. Friedman, L. M. (1994). Is There a Modern Legal Culture? Ratio Juris, 7(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00172.x
11. Gofar, A. (2017). The Reform of the Procedural Religious Court Law Based on Islamic Law in Indonesian Legal System. Sriwijaya Law Review, 1(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol1.iss2.37.pp114-127
12. Harris, J. W. (1971). When and why does the grundnorm change? The Cambridge Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300089340
13. Indrastuti, L., Jaelani, A. K., & Nurhidayatuloh. (2019). Decentralization of Health in the Era of Extensive Autonomy in North Konawe District. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(15), 845–853.
14. Mertokusumo, S. (1986). Mengenal hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
15. Nelken, D. (2004). Using The Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 29(1), 1–26.
16. Nurhidayatuloh, Febrian, Annalisa, Y., Idris, A., Ikhsan, R. M., Helena Primadianti, S., & Zuhro, F. (2019). Does limitation rule in international and regional human rights law instruments restrict its implementation? International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1125.0982S919
17. Nurhidayatuloh, Febrian, Apriandi, M., Y, A., Sulistyaningrum, H. P., Handayani, I., … Tedjomurti,
K. (2020). Transboundary Haze-Free for Southeast Asian Countries by 2020: A Delusional Vision? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 1923–1929. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i2/pr200494
18. Seidman, A., & Seidman, R. B. (1996). Drafting Legislation for Development: Lessons from a Chinese Project. American Journal of Comparative Law, 44(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/840519
19. Sesse, M. S. (2013). Budaya Hukum dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Nasional.
Jurnal Hukum Diktum, 11(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v11i2.166
20. Soekanto, Soejono. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
21. Soekanto, Soerjono. (1987). Hubungan Hukum Adat dengan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 17(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol17.no2.1300
22. Taufiq, M., Sarsiti, & Widyaningsih, R. (2016). Forms and Mechanisms of Law Dispute Resolution Using the Principle of Pancasila Based oc Local Wisdom. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 16(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.399
23. Wahyudi, Y. (2007). Maqashid Syari’ah dalam Pergumulan Politik. Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press.
24. Ward, D. A., & Ancel, M. (2001). Social Defence: A Modern Approach to Criminal Problems. London: Routledge.
25. Wignjosoebroto, S. (2012). Hukum yang Tak Kunjung Tegak: Apa yang Salah dengan Kerja Penegakan Hukum di Negeri Ini? In D. Fedrian, E. Faiz, Hermansyah, Imran, & Suwantoro (Eds.), Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia (pp. 3–16). Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
26. Wiratraman, H. P. (2013). Good Governance dan Pembaruan Hukum di Indonesia: Refleksi Dalam Penelitian Sosio-Legal. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.1.2013.21-34
27. Zoelva, H. (2015). Prospek Negara Hukum Indonesia: Gagasan dan Realita. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n2.78
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
