ARE THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND THE ROLE OF EDUCATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS ABLE TO MAKE OUTSTANDING TEACHER?

Authors

  • Rusi Rusmiati Aliyyah Universitas Djuanda, Bogor, Indonesia Author
  • Rasmitadila Universitas Djuanda, Bogor, Indonesia Author
  • Megan Asri Humaira Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Djuanda, Bogor, Indonesia Author
  • Endin Mujahidin Universitas Ibnu Khaldun, Bogor, Indonesia Author
  • Suryadi Graduate Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Widyasari Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Djuanda, Bogor, Indonesia Author
  • Reza Rachmadtullah University of PGRI AdiBuana, Surabaya. Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/w2nyax16

Keywords:

Assessment, Educational Stakeholders,, Outstanding Teacher

Abstract

The research aims to determine the assessment criteria and the role of education stakeholders in supporting the achievement of elementary school teachers' achievement programs Using a multi- site approach and survey with research respondents consisting of teachers, principals, supervisors, Teacher Working Groups and (KKG) education offices that receive teacher championship performed in 2017 and 2018 in SDN 03 Menteng (DKI Jakarta), SDN Sukasari 5 Tangerang (Banten), SDN Dukuh 3 Salatiga (Central Java), SDN Al-Izhar Pondok Labu (DKI Jakarta), SDN Al-Irsyad Al- Islamiyyah Bekasi (West Java), SDN 12 Dauh Puri (Bali), SDN 023 Pajagalan Bandung (West Java). Data collection was carried out through interviews, questionnaires, documented observation, and discussion group forums. Data analysis techniques using data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results of the study stated that the primary school teacher's achievement evaluation indicators consisted of portfolios (20%), instructional videos (10%), written tests (20%), scientific papers (20%), presentations of scientific papers (20%), and exemplary (10%). While educational stakeholders play a role by their respective duties and functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adu-gyamfi, E., Kwadwo, P., Edd, A., & Asamoah-boateng, C. (2019). An Examination of Differences between the Mean Indicator Ratings by Different Stakeholders in Distance Education Programme. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p72

2. Ahmad Gawdy Prananosa, M.Rusni Eka, Rusi Rusmiati Aliyyah, A. Y. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Keterampilan Berkomunikasi Kepada Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Journal of Administration and Educational Management, 1, 63–74.

3. Aliyyah, R. A. et all. (2020). Guru berprestasi: penguatan pendidikan di era revolusi industri 4.0, 11(April), 59–64.

4. Aliyyah, R. R. et all. (2020). Outstanding Teachers ’ Competition : Between Strategies and Challenges. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 400(Icream 2019), 153–157.

5. Aliyyah, R R. (2014). Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Berbasis Karakter Dan Teknologi Dalam Mengatasi Tantangan Globalisasi (Studi Kasus Di Smk Wikrama Kota Bogor) the Education Implementation Based on Character and Technology Toward the Globalisation Challenge (a Case Study Resear. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 5(1).

6. Aliyyah, Rusi Rusmiati, Humaira, M. A., Mulyadi, D., & Ulfah, S. W. (2019). Acquiring And Developing Outstanding Teachers Candidate : A Comparative Study From State And Private Elementary School. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(11), 1843–1847.

7. Aliyyah, Rusi Rusmiati, Humaira, M. A., Ulfah, S. W., & Mulyadi, D. (2019). Outstanding Teachers : The Steps In Acquiring Them. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1, 440–447.

8. Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2017). Teacher Electronic Portfolio and its Relation to EFL Student Teacher Performance and Attitude. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.1p.42

9. Arifin, Z., Nurtanto, M., Warju, W., Rabiman, R., & Kholifah, N. (2020). The TAWOCK Conceptual Model for Content Knowledge for Professional Teaching in Vocational Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20561

10. Baker, M. (2018). Playing , Talking , Co-constructing : Exemplary Teaching for Young Dual Language Learners Across Program Types. Early Childhood Education Journal, 0(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0903-0

11. Cosner, S. (2018). What Makes a Leadership Preparation Program Exemplary? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, (Mc 147), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118819661

12. Cowan, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). National Board Certification and Teacher Effectiveness: Evidence From Washington State. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(3), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1099768

13. Dixon, F. J., & Pilkington, R. (2017). Teaching in Higher Education Poor relations ? Tensions and torment ; a view of excellence in teaching and learning from the Cinderella sector. Teaching in Higher Education ISSN:, 2517(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1301912

14. Dori, Y. J., Zohar, A., Carmi, M., Zohar, A., & Carmi, M. (2018). Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students ’ scientific thinking skills. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1431419

15. Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher Performance Appraisal : More about Performance or Development ? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9).

16. Eridafithri. (2015). The Application of Portfolios to Assess Progress in Writing of EFL Students at Secondary Schools in Banda Aceh. Studies In English Language And Education, 2, 1–16.

17. Fantini, A. E. (2018). Teacher Assessment and Evaluation. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0652

18. Ferenc, J., Cerven, F., Birc, E., & Sevc, A. (2017). Intentionally Flawed Manuscripts as Means for Teaching Students to Critically Evaluate. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education Resistance, 1–

9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21084

19. Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgren, J. A., Hare, J. C., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a Test of Scientific Argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(4).

20. Gelfer, J., Hara, K. O., Krasch, D., & Nguyen, N. (2015). Teacher portfolios : an effective way to assess teacher performance and enhance learning. Early Child Development and Care, (March 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1005614

21. slami, R. E., Sari, I. J., Sjaifuddin, S., Nurtanto, M., Ramli, M., & Siregar, A. (2019). An Assessment of Pre-service Biology Teachers on Student Worksheets Based on Scientific Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155, 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012068

22. Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2014). Teacher Competencies for the Implementation of Collaborative Learning in the Classroom : a Framework and Research Review. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9

23. Kiymet SELVI. (2016). Teachers ’ Competencies Teachers ’ Competencies. Teachers’ Competencies That, VII(January 2010), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura20107133

24. Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., Berg, E. Van Den, Schuitema, J. A., Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., … Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students ’ ability in performing scientific inquiry : instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 5143, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530

25. Loeb, S. (2019). Effective Schools : Teacher Hiring, Assigment, Development dan Retention. Association For Education Finance and Plolicy, 7(3).

26. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Avramides, K., Hunter, J., Luckin, R., Clark, W., … Oliver, M. (2016). Using teacher inquiry to support technology- enhanced formative assessment : a review of the literature to inform a new method assessment : a review of the literature to inform a new method. Interactive Learning Environments ISSN:, 4820(January). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1121152

27. Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru (pp. 1–32). Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

28. Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 28(4), 485–487. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs.2011.100352

29. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). Guidelines Selection Of Basic Education Teachers Edicated National Levels. Jakarta.

30. Naganuma, S. (2017). An assessment of civic scientific literacy in Japan : development of a more authentic assessment task and scoring rubric. International Journal of Science Education, 8455(May), 1–

23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1323131

31. Nurtanto, M., Sofyan, H., Fawaid, M., & Rabiman, R. (2019). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Industry 4.0: Improving Learning Quality through Character-Based Literacy Learning and Life Career Skill (LL-LCS). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2487–2494. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071128

32. Nurtanto, M., Widjanarko, D., Sofyan, H., Rabiman, & Triyono, M. B. (2019). Learning By Creating: Transforming Automotive Electrical Textual Material Into Visual Animation As A Creative Learning Products (CLP). International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 1634–1642. http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-1019-22932

33. Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto -, & Ramdani̇, S. D. (2020). The Effect of STEM-EDP in Professional Learning on Automotive Engineering Competence in Vocational High School. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–656. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jegys/645047

34. Rabiman, R., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2020). Design And Development E-Learning System By Learning Management System (LMS) In Vocational Education. 9(01), 6.

35. Rusi Rusmiati Aliyyah, Widyasari, Didi Mulyadi, Sri Wahyuni Ulfah, S. R. (2019). Guru Berprestasi Sumber Daya Manusia Pengembang Mutu Pendidikan Indonesia. Alignment: Journal of Administration and Educational Management, 2, 157–165.

36. Sengupta, M. A. (2016). Teaching Excellence and Innovative Practices : A Case Study of National Awardee Teachers of India. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 48–53.

37. Sensuse, D. I., & Purwandari, B. (2018). Defining e-Portofolio Factor for Competency Certification using Fuzzy Delphi Method. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 25–33.

38. Sorensen, N. (2016). Professional Development in Education Improvisation and teacher expertise : implications for the professional development of outstanding teachers professional development of outstanding teachers. Professional Development in Education, 5257(March). https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1127854

39. Waswas, D., & Gasaymeh, A. M. (2017). The Role of School Principals in the Governorate of Ma ’ an in Promoting Intellectual Security among Students. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p193

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Aliyyah, R. R., Rasmitadila, Humaira, M. A., Mujahidin, E., Suryadi, Widyasari, & Rachmadtullah, R. (2020). ARE THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND THE ROLE OF EDUCATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS ABLE TO MAKE OUTSTANDING TEACHER?. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 8946-8957. https://doi.org/10.61841/w2nyax16