DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZING AREMANIA COHESIVENESS

Authors

  • E.K. Widijatmoko Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/8ew2zj89

Keywords:

Aremania, Cohesiveness, Phenomenology, Durkheim

Abstract

The support team's cohesiveness has an important role to play in a soccer match, which is to be fun. However, the support team became frightening, worrying because the actions of some supporters ignored cohesiveness. The supporting cohesion role is an inherent part of the entertainment side of a soccer match. The purpose of this study is to describe the dynamics of organizing Aremania cohesiveness. The research questions are as follows: 1) what aspects of Aremania cohesiveness are regulated, 2) the extent to which Aremania cohesiveness has been regulated, 3)how to strengthen Aremania cohesiveness is regulated. The qualitative approach chosen in this study, the type of research model, the study of phenomenology. Data collection was carried out using participant observation and in-depth structured interviews. Data validity test uses data triangulation which is divided into three namely technique, time and source. Field data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. The research location is Bandungrejosari Subdistrict, Sukun Regency, Malang City. The results of the study, the cohesiveness of Aremania governed aspects of personality, interpersonal aspects and aspects of group performance. Aremania consistently transmits social cohesiveness, within groups, communities and regions. Cohesiveness through personality composition, interpersonal cohesiveness and the performance of the Aremania group. Aremana's individual diversity forms a personality composition within the team's cohesiveness and group performance. This encourages the emergence of community cohesion and group cohesiveness to work towards cohesiveness performance.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anwar, K. (2016). Working with Group-Tasks and Group Cohesiveness. International Education Studies, 9(8), 105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n8p105

2. Banwo, A. O., Du, J., & Onokala, U. (2015). The Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Performance: The Nigerian Case. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n6p146

3. Burns, J., Hull, G., Lefko-Everett, K., & Njozela, L. (2018). Defining social cohesion. Cape Town:

SALDRU, UCT, (216). Retrieved from www.opensaldru.uct.ac.za.

4. Craig, T. Y., & Kelly, J. R. (1999). Group cohesiveness and creative performance. Group Dynamics, 3(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.3.4.243

5. Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Larsen, M., Lorenz, J., & Koch, M. (2018). Social cohesion and its correlates: A comparison of western and asian societies. Comparative Sociology, 17(3– 4), 426–455. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341468

6. Dyaram, L., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2005). Unearthed: The Other Side of Group Cohesiveness. Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2005.11892479

7. Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation, 32(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480

8. Ghosh, S., Dhall, A., Sebe, N., & Gedeon, T. (2019). Predicting Group Cohesiveness in Images. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2019–July(July), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852184

9. Jenson, J. (2002). Identifying the Links: Social Cohesion and Culture. Canadian Journal of Communication, 27(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2002v27n2a1289

10. Jenson, J., & Commonwealth Secretariat. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion.

11. Mason, A. (2010). Integration, cohesion and national identity: Theoretical reflections on recent British policy. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000104

12. Maume, D. J. (2013). Social Ties and Adolescent Sleep Disruption. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513498512

13. McKenna, S., Lee, E., Klik, K. A., Markus, A., Hewstone, M., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018). Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories. PLoS ONE, 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193337

14. Mohd Zainal Munshid, H., & Rosli, M. (2012). The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An empirical study of cooperatives movement in Malaysia. International Journal of Cooperative Studies, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.11634/216826311403110

15. Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A Legacy of Confusion? Small Group Research, 20(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648902000103

16. Picazo, C., Gamero, N., Zornoza, A., & Peiró, J. M. (2015). Testing relations between group cohesion and satisfaction in project teams: A cross-level and cross-lagged approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.894979

17. van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000573

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 6 (2020): 24 (6) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Widijatmoko, E. (2020). DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZING AREMANIA COHESIVENESS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 8694-8700. https://doi.org/10.61841/8ew2zj89