An Analytical Assessment of Mathematical Learning of Students of North-East Delhi

Authors

  • Dr Anil Kumar Teotia Dilshad Garden, Delhi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/a1t6z506

Keywords:

Mathematical understanding, NAS, , Achievement level,, Pedagogy.

Abstract

Students, bypassing over different grades, show a fall in the mathematical achievement level. In the following paper, we tried to analyse the learning level of the students of the North-East district of Delhi. NCERT developed Learning Outcomes for each grade from I to VIII classes regarding these learning outcomes. We found that the learning of mathematics is not at all satisfactory in the schools. Students show the inferior quality of mathematical understanding; we tried to find out the poorly developed concepts and the reasons behind this. We also tried to find out the highest developed concept of mathematics in students and the ideas for it. Lack of pedagogical understanding in teachers, no use of concrete material, non-revisiting of the previous concepts are some of the reasons behind low performance of the students, on the other hand, visual ideas of mathematics, and thoughts that develop automatically with no or little help of school developed better in the minds of kids. We find that a majority of teachers say that they have full understating of curricular expectations and know the entire pedagogy, but the result which was obtained about students’ learning level speaks different picture. The majority of kids say that it is challenging for them to understand teachers' talk in the classroom, but almost all the students like to come to school whatsoever is the reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adams, D.M., McLaren, B.M., Durkin, K., Mayer, R.E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Isotani, S., van Velsen, M.: Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 401–411 (2014)

2. ASER (2018), Annual Status of Education Report (Rural), New Delhi: Pratham Resource Centre

3. ASER (2019), Annual Status of Education Report (Rural), New Delhi: Pratham Resource Centre.

4. Boero, P., Dapueto, C., & Parenti, L. (1996). Didactics of mathematics and the professional knowledge of teachers. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1097-1122). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

5. Clements, D.H. (1999). The effective use of computers with young children. Mathematics in the early years. Copley, J. (ed). Reston, VA., National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 119–128

6. McLaren, B.M., Adams, D., Durkin, K., Goguadze, G., Mayer, R.E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Van Velsen, M.: To err is human, to explain and correct is divine: a study of erroneous interactive examples with middle school math students. 21st Century Learning for 21st Century skills, pp. 222–235. Springer, Berlin (2012)

7. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National Curriculum Framework New Delhi

8. National Council for Teacher Education. (2010). National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education. New Delhi: NCTE.

9. Sisman, G.T., Aksu, M.: A study on sixth-grade students' misconceptions and errors in spatial measurement: length, area, and volume. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 14(7), 1293–1319 (2015)

10. Eduardo, J. T., Rosas, M. F., Barrameda, R. B., & Mayuga, E. D. (2019). Fuzzy logic: A technique for assessing students' learning performance. Test Engineering and Management, 81(11-12), 5213-5217. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

11. Abu Bakar, N., & Baijuri, I. Z. (2020). Understanding special education teachers’ perspectives on professionalism in educating autistic students. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(1), 34-41. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

12. Afridi, W. A. K., Hashim, H., & Kuppusamy, M. (2020). A pilot study of professional networking sites adoption by university students. Test Engineering and Management, 82(1-2), 674-681. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

13. Abdullah, S. M. S. M. (2019). The effect of teaching mathematics using blended learning on achievement and development of critical thinking skills among first-grade female students of the intermediate stage. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 1142-1161. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

14. Adnan, M., Ahmad, A., Yusof, M. H., & Baharudin, N. F. A. (2019). Mathematics’ procedural knowledge of form four daily school students in district of petaling utama, selangor. [Pengetahuan prosedural matematik murid tingkatan empat sekolah menengah harian biasa dalam daerah Petaling Utama, Selangor] International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(8 Special Issue), 829-833. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

15. Adnan, M., & Muniandy, K. A. (2019). The use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons towards the achievement and motivation of year five students in the topic of space. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(8 Special Issue), 777-781. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

16. Kaban, S., Sakmal, J., Auliaty, Y., Marini, A., & Wahyudi, A. (2019). Model of creative thinking skills for elementary school students. International Journal of Control and Automation, 12(4), 70-76. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Teotia, D. A. K. (2020). An Analytical Assessment of Mathematical Learning of Students of North-East Delhi. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 8386-8393. https://doi.org/10.61841/a1t6z506