THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORKSHEET BASED ON PROBLEM BASED LEARNING – THINKING MAPS STRATEGY TO INCREASE THE CRITICAL THINKING OF PRIMARY STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cev8hj43Keywords:
development of worksheet based on problem based learning, thinking maps strategy to increase the critical thinking of primary studentsAbstract
--- The goal of this experiment and development is to enhance worksheet which is on the basic of problem based learning with the strategy of thinking maps in proper way and increase the skill of critical thinking effectively. This method of observation uses the Borg and Gall’s design. The populations of this experiment are the fifth grades students from Lampung Tengah Primary School in Lampung Province, Indonesia worksheet product validated media expert, theory expert and practitioner. Data collector uses a valid and reliable objective test instrument. Data analysis operates N-Gain. The research result showed that worksheet is valid and decent to be used and it’s very convincing to expanse students critical mind skill
Downloads
References
1. Alikhan, Nishat. 2014. Thoughts on Thinking Maps: A New Way to Think. New Horizon School. LA
2. Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H. & Wallace, J.M. 2007. Critical Thinking: A Student’s Introduction (5th Ed). Mc Graw Hill International Edition. New York.
3. Bialik, M & Fadel, C. 2015. Skill for the 21st Century. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Boston.
4. Choo, Serene S., Rotgans,Jerome I., Yew, Elaine H.J., & Schmidt, Henk G. 2011. Effect of Worksheet Scaffolds on Students Learning in Problem Based Learning. Journal Adv in Health Science Education Springerlink, 16 (1), 517-528.
5. Firdaus, Kailani, I., Bakar, Md. Nor, Bakry. 2015. Developing Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 226-236
6. Holzman, Stafenie. 2004. Thinking Maps: Strategy- Based Learning for English Language Learners (And Others)
7. Hyerley, D. 2004. Student Successes with Thinking Maps. Thousand Oak, Corwin Press. California.
8. Jatmiko, Prahani, & Munasir. 2018. The Comparison of OR-IPA Teaching Model and Problem Based Learning Model Effectiveness to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Journal Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 300-309.
9. Johnson, B Elaine. 2006. Contextual Teaching and Learning. (Alih Bahasa: Ibnu
10. Setiawan). MLC. Bandung.
11. Judge, B., McCreery, E., Jones, P. 2009. Critical Thinking Skills for Education Students. Learning Matters. Southernhay East
12. Komalasari, Kokom. 2010. Pembelajaran Kontekstual. PT Refika Aditama. Bandung.
13. Komalasari, Kokom. 2015. Pembelajaran Kontekstual, Konsep dan Aplikasi. Refika Aditama. Bandung.
14. Lee, Che-Di. 2014. Worksheet Usage, Reading Achievement, Classes’ Lack of
15. Readiness, and Science Achievement: A Cross-Country Comparison.
16. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and
17. Technology, 2(2), 96-106.
18. Omar, Ainon, et al. 2016. Thinking Maps to Promote Critical Thinking through the Teaching of Literature in the ESL Context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics,1(1), 23-35.
19. Price, Robert Seth. 2015. National Urban Alliance High Intellectual Processes. Buffalo Public School. New York.
20. Rajendran, N.S. 2013. Higher-Order Thinking skill. University Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tanjong Malim Perak.
21. Saputro, Rahmanto Dwi & Gunansyah, Ganesa. 2013. Peningkatan Keterampilan
22. Berpikir Kritis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar. Ejournal Unesa. Surabaya.
23. Siew, Nyet Moi & Mapeala, Ruslan. 2016. The Effects of Problem Based Learning with Thinking Maps on Fifth Graders’Science Critical Thinking. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15 (5), 602-616
24. Siew, Nyet Moi & Mapeala, Ruslan. 2017. The Effects of Thinking Maps- Aided Problem Based Learning on Motivation Towards Science Learning Among Fifth Graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 379-394.
25. Stobaugh, R. 2012. Assessing Critical Thinking in Middle and High Schools. New York: Routledge.
26. Susanto, Ahmad. 2014. Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar.
27. Kencana. Jakarta.
28. Toman, Ufuk, et al. 2013. Extended Worksheet Developed According to 5E
29. Model Based on Constructivist Approach. International Journal on New
30. Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(4), 173-183.
31. Wisudawati dan Sulistyowati Eka. 2014. Metodelogi Pembelajaran IPA. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
32. Yamin, Martinis. 2013. Strategi & Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Referensi (GP Pres Grup). Jakarta.
33. Yildirim, Nagihan, et al. 2011. The Effect of the Worksheets on Students’
34. Achievement in Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Turkish Science
35. Education, 8(3), 44-58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
