THE DEVELOPMENT VOCATIONAL WELL-BEING TAXONOMY FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF THE NATION: A REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/kwah9122Keywords:
Vocational Well-Being Taxonomy,, TVET, , sustainability index,, - vocational domain, social and economic sustainabilityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to develop Vocational Well-Being Taxonomy for the social and economic sustainability of the nation. Well-being is the value of an individual's happiness and contentment, and it also refers to the physical, emotional, spiritual, and cultural comforts that can be achieved when the needs are met. It is closely related to psychological capacity and human capital skills. The concept of well-being is closely related to human capital that can be translated into individual skills, as highlighted in TVET. TVET agenda is also highlighted as one of the strategies in achieving Shared Prosperity Vision 2030. The purpose of Shared Prosperity Vision 2030 is for Malaysia to make life quality as a developed nation focused on the well-being of the people through various innovation strategies and transformation. However, Malaysia still critically lags in terms of the number of skilled workers, accounting for only 20% as compared to OECD countries such as Germany (60%), Singapore (51%), and Finland (43%). The main problem with the education system in Malaysia is that it focuses too much on the academic stream so that the vocational stream is considered second class. As the rate of unemployment among the academic stream begins to rise, there is awareness to enhance students’ participation in the vocational stream to ensure the well-being of the people in terms of getting a job. In academic education, Bloom's taxonomy was created to classify educational goals, objectives, and outcomes. But Bloom's Taxonomy does not meet the criteria for assessing "well-being" through vocational skills in order to get a job in highly-skilled fields. The well-being of the people through full-employment may not be achieved without the strategy of increasing skilled workers through TVET. As such, it is critical to determine the important domains for vocational well-being that could be developed as a taxonomy for the social and economic sustainability of the nation. This initial study will employ a thorough review of relevant literature and theories.
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, L.W., & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds.). (1994). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Ninety- third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt.2.Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: New York: Longman.
3. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques (No. 102). Sage.
4. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education purposes, traditions, and prospects. Queensland: Springer Science Business Media B.V.
5. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Book 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman Group Ltd.
6. Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of education objectives the classification of educational goals: Handbook 1, cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist. 19, 1－15.
8. Carbonell, L. (2004). Instructional development timeline: Learning theory. Retrieved from http://www.educationau.edu.au//archives/cp/.
9. Cahan, D. (Ed.). (1993). Hermann von Helmholtz and the foundations of nineteenth-century science (p. 569). Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Clarke, L., & C. Winch. (2007). Vocational education: International approaches, developments, and systems. London: Routledge.
11. Dewey, J. (1916). Nationalizing education. Journal of Education, 84(16), 425-428.
12. Eamonn, M. (2012). Taxonomy in biology and visualization. https: //isa- tab.sourceforange.net/docs/publications/Taxonomy.pdf, Jan 2015.
13. Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement. (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
14. Ennis, Robert H. (1985). Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum, 65:1. Winter, 28 – 1.
15. Finch, C. R., & Crunkilton, J. R. (1999). Curriculum development in vocational and technical education, planning, content, and implementation. United State of America: Allyn & Bacon. A Viacom Company.
16. Gagné, R. J. (1985). A taxonomic revision of the Asian rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason), and its relatives (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Entomography, 3, 127-162.
17. Gorunescu, F. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts, models, and techniques (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
18. Gusnetty Jayasinga. (2013). Taksonomi dalam pembelajaran. Program PascaSarjana Pendidikan IPS. Fakultas Keguruan & Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Lampung.
19. Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: Longman.
20. Hansen, D. T. (1994). Teaching and the sense of vocation. Educational Theory, 44(3), 259-275. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1994.00259.x
21. Haolader, F. A., Ali, M. R., & Foysol, K. M. (2015). The taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: Current practices at polytechnics in Bangladesh and its effects on developing students’ competences. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training(IJRVET) Vol. 2, No. 2: 99-118.
22. Hauenstein, A. D. (1998). A conceptual framework for educational objectives: A holistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Univ Pr of Amer.
23. Hiniker L.A., & Putnam, R.A. (2009). Partnering to meet the needs of a changing workplace; in Rupert Maclean, David Wilson, Chris Chinien; International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning: Germany: Springer Science Business Media.
24. Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.orang/topics/cogsys/bloom.html [pdf].
25. Irvine, J. (2017). A comparison of revised Bloom and Marzano’s New Taxonomy of Learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, v33.
26. Janice Van Cleave (2010). History of classification. What is taxonomy, and who introduced it? VanCleave's Science Fun. Your Guide to Science Projects, Fun Experiments, and Science Research Jean Guichard. (2001). A Century of Career Education: Review and Perspectives. International. Journal. for Educational and Vocational Guidance 1:155–176.
27. Komarek, J., Kastovsky, J., Mares, J., and Johansen, J. R. (2014). Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera), using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 86, 295–335.
28. Koschmann, T. (2000). The physiological and the social in the psychologies of Dewey and Thorndike: The matter of habit. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.). Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 314-319.
29. Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Affective Domain.
30. Kunen, S., R. Cohen, and R. Solomon (1981). “A levels of processing analysis of bloom’s taxonomy.” Journal of Educational Psychology. 73, 202-211.
31. Labaree, D. P. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (1), 39-81.
32. Manktelow, M. (2010). History of taxonomy. Retrieved on Feb 20, 2014, from http://www.atbi.eu/summerschool/files/summerschool/Manktelow_Syllabus.pdf
33. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Belknap P. of Harvard U.P, Cambridge (Mass.). Retrieved from
http://www.explorelifeonearth.orang/cursos/Mayr(1982)GrowthofBiologicalThought.pdf.
34. Maidatulakmal Othman. (2012). Tahap kompetensi pelajar melaksanakan kerja amali berpandukan domain psikomotor Simpson. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Johor.
35. Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
36. McAshan, H. H. (1979). Competency-based education and behavioral objectives. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
37. Miller, M. D. (1985). Principles and philosophy for vocational education. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, The National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
38. Mohd Najid, N., Tze Kiong, T., Che’ Rus, R., & Budiman, H. (2019). A Needs analysis on the development of problem based learning module for the microcontroller subject at Vocational College. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 43-53.
39. Osman, N., & Kamis, A. (2019). Innovation leadership for sustainable organizational climate in institution of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 57-64.
40. Oliva, P. F. (1992). Developing the curriculum. Third Edition. New York, United States of America: Harper Collins Publishers.
41. Okwelle P. C. (2013). Appraisal of theoretical models of psychomotor skills and applications to technical vocational education and training (tvet) system in Nigeria. Journal of Research and Development, 1, (6), 25-35.
42. Partha & Kholia. (2010). Indian integrated plant taxonomic information system: A conceptual framework. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(3), 35-42.
43. Pavlova, M. (2008). Technology and vocational education for sustainable development: Empowering individuals for the future (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media.
44. Prosser, C. A., & Quigley, T. H. (1949). Vocational education: in a democracy. American Technical Society.
45. Purcell, A. (2018). Basic Biology: An introduction. Basic Biology Limited. New Zealand ISBN Agency, National Library of New Zealand.
46. Ramlee Mustapha. (2017). Skills Training and Vocational Education in Malaysia. In: Samuel M., Tee M., Symaco L. (eds) Education in Malaysia. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns, and Prospects, vol 39. Springer, Singapore
47. Rao M. M., & Reddy, S.M. (2007). Plant Taxonomy: Systems of classification. In Reddy S. M. et al. (eds.) University Botany - 3, New Age International, 7-32, ISBN 978-81-224-1547-6.
48. Rouhan, G., & Gaudeul, M. (2014). Plant taxonomy: a historical perspective, current challenges, and perspectives. In Molecular Plant Taxonomy (pp. 1-37). Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
49. Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds?. Harpercollins College Div.
50. Simpson, M. G. (2010). "Chapter 1 plant systematics: An overview". Plant Systematics (2nd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-374380-0.
51. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
52. Sperber, M. (2005). ‘How undergraduate education became college lite and a personal apology.’ In Thomas C. Reeves. (2006). How do you know they are learning?: The importance of alignment in higher education. Int. J. Learning Technology, 2(4), 294-309.
53. Stevens, P. F. (2013). History of taxonomy, Published Online: 29 Jan (2013). Wiley Online Library. Missouri Botanical Gardens, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
54. Seyyed Mohammad Ali Soozandehfar & Mohammad Reza Adeli. (2016). A critical appraisal of Bloom’s Taxonomy. American Research Journal of English and Literature (ARJEL), Volume 2, pp:1-9.
55. Tessaring, M. (2009). Anticipation of skill requirements: European activities and approaches; In Rupert Maclean, David Wilson, & Chris Chinien; International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning. Germany: Springer Science Business Media
56. Thorndike, E.L. (1943). Man and his works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Tomei, Lawrence A. (2005). Taxonomy for the technology domain. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers, Inc.
58. Toni. G. (2012). A quantitative content analysis of the common core state standards compared to Missouri's grade-level expectations using the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy framework. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Education Faculty of Lindenwood University.
59. UNESCO (2011). Technical and vocational education and training. http://www.unesco.orang/new/en/education/themes/education-building-bl. Retrieved on 10/7/2015.
60. Vargas, E. A. (2017). B. F. Skinner’s theory of behavior, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 18:1, 2- 38, DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2015.1065640.
61. Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
62. Wagiran, Retnowati, E., & Azman, M. N. A. (2020). When Vocational Teachers Improve Their TPACK Competencies Through Lesson Study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (4) 1475- 7192.
63. Walter D. Pierce., & Charles E. Gray. (2013). Teaching in the three domains of learning; The taxonomies simplified for educational objectives, activities, and outcomes. United States: University Press of America.
64. Wayne. D. R. (2014). Affective Domain Applications In Standards-Based Education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University.
65. Weckowicz, T. E. (2010). A history of great ideas in abnormal psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Elsevier Publishers. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.my/books/about/A_History_of_Great_Ideas_in_Abnormal_Psy.html.
66. Winkel, F. W. (1987). Politie en voorkoming misdrijven: Effecten en neveneffecten van voorlichting (Doctoral dissertation, Mens en Recht).
67. Zaitun Sidin. (2000). “Pembangunan dan perkembangan kurikulum di universiti teknologi Malaysia”. Prosiding Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: 143-162.
68. Zhou, M. & Brown, D. (2015). Educational learning theories: 2nd edition. Education Open Textbooks. 1.
69. Jurabaevich, S. N. (2019). Fundamentals of economic diagnostics and modeling in assessing socio- economic development. Test Engineering and Management, 81(11-12), 1607-1618. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
70. Lee, J. (2019). Study of migration and mobility in the age of disruption with socio-economic changes. Test Engineering and Management, 81(5-6), 1-4. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
71. Ramesh Babu, S., Chandrasekar, K., & Senthil Kumaran, N. (2019). Exploring the women preferences in tourism and plotting ways for economic growth in india. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(19), 928-936. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
