LEADERSHIP STYLE OF MAHATHIR MOHAMAD: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cwae8c44Keywords:
-Mahathir Mohamad, Mahathir’s leadership style;, leadership style, ; national leadership, systematic literature reviewAbstract
National leadership is a key element of the perpetual administration and development of a nation. Mahathir Mohamad is one example of an excellent national leader based on his leadership style. To date, no systematic review has been done on his leadership style. Therefore, this article aims to analyse the existing literature on the leadership style of Mahathir. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, 11 related studies were identified from the Web of Science and Scopus databases as well as through direct handpicking of related sources. Further review of the articles through qualitative analysis ensued in nine core themes on Mahathir’s leadership, namely, people-oriented, resourceful, visionary, pragmatic, good communication skills, highly ethical, trustworthy, core value-based, and authentic. Meanwhile, there were a total of 22 sub-themes under these core themes. In general, Mahathir’s leadership style is holistic and his elements of leadership that are good and effective can be emulated and practised by individuals and leaders in their daily life. The findings can contribute to and empower the leadership field of study, particularly national leadership and good governance. Several recommendations are emphasised such as to conduct further quantitative or mixed methods studies, to highlight the theoretical or conceptual leadership frameworks employed in studies about Mahathir’s leadership, and to underscore the contribution of Mahathir’s leadership in the leadership field of study.
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, W. J. (2019). The Mahathir effect in Malaysia’s 2018 election: the role of credible personalities in regime transitions. Democratization, 26(3), 521-536.
2. Akbarzadeh, S., & Connor, K. (2005). The organization of the islamic conference: Sharing an illusion. Middle East Policy, 12(2), 79-92.
3. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
4. Beardsworth, R. (2017). Towards a critical concept of the statesperson. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(1), 100-121.
5. Beng, O. K. (2006). Mahathir as Muslim leader. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2006(1), 172-180.
6. Boland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student's guide. Sage.
7. Bulpitt, J. (1986). The discipline of the new democracy: Mrs Thatcher's domestic statecraft. Political studies, 34(1), 19-39.
8. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. NY: Harper & Row.
9. Case, W. (2017). Stress testing leadership in Malaysia: the 1MDB scandal and Najib Tun Razak. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 633-654.
10. Cheah, J. L. S., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017a). Confucian Value-Based Leadership Communication: A study on Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(3).
11. Cheah, J. L. S., Yusof, N., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017b). Tun Dr. Mahathir’s Leadership Communication: The Confucian Perspective. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 33, p. 00060). EDP Sciences.
12. Chin, J. (2018). The Comeback Kid: Mahathir and the 2018 Malaysian General Elections. The Round Table, 107(4), 535-537.
13. Chinnasamy, S., & Manaf, N. A. (2018). Social media as political hatred mode in Malaysia’s 2018 General Election. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 53). EDP Sciences.
14. Coetzer, M., Bussin, M., & Geldenhuys, M. (2017). The functions of a servant leader. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 5.
15. Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world (Vol. 264). John Wiley & Sons.
16. Doucette, J. (2017). The Occult of Personality: Korea's Candlelight Protests and the Impeachment of Park Geun-hye. The Journal of Asian Studies, 76(4), 851-860.
17. Embong, R., & Hassan, H. (2013). The Representations of Tun Dr Mahathir in Lat’s Cartoons in Addressing Issues of International Affairs. Sains Humanika, 65(2).
18. Embong, R., Hassan, H., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2016). The representations of leadership by example in editorial cartoons. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 625-650.
19. Funston, J. (2018). Malaysia's 14th General Election (GE14)-The Contest for the Malay Electorate. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 57-83.
20. Furuoka, F. (2007). Malaysia-Japan Relations under the Mahathir Administration: Case Studies of the ““Look East”” Policy and Japanese Investment in Malaysia. Asian Survey, 47(3), 505-519.
21. Gabriel, Y. (2015). The caring leader–What followers expect of their leaders and why?. Leadership, 11(3), 316-334.
22. Harzing, A. W. (2019). Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?. Scientometrics, 1-9.
23. Hussain, A. A. (1997). The Leadership Factor in Administrative Reform in Malaysia, with a Specific Study on the Leadership of Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, Prime Minister of Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 5(2), 103-123.
24. Ismail, R. and Saad, N. 2007. Jejak bakti: sumbangan Tun Dr. Mahathir dalam bidang kejuruteraan. Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP).
25. Jaes, L. (2017). Akal Budi Tempatan dalam Pengurusan Pembangunan Oleh Soeharto, Mahathir dan Lee Kuan Yew. Universiti Utara Malaysia: Ph.D. Thesis.
26. Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2019). Only When We Agree! How Value Congruence Moderates the Impact of Goal‐Oriented Leadership on Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12-24.
27. Johansson, C., D. Miller, V., & Hamrin, S. (2014). Conceptualizing communicative leadership: A framework for analysing and developing leaders’ communication competence. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19(2), 147-165.
28. Kearney, E., Shemla, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Scholz, F. A. (2019). A paradox perspective on the interactive effects of visionary and empowering leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
29. Khalid, K. M. (2011). Malaysia's foreign policy under Najib: A comparison with Mahathir. Asian Survey, 51(3), 429-452.
30. Khattab, U. (2004). Wawasan 2020: Engineering a Modern Malay (sia) State Campaigns and Minority Stakes. Media Asia, 31(3), 170-177.
31. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Panarchy, the collapse of the Canadian health care system, 124.
32. Krass, P. (Ed.). (1998). The book of leadership wisdom: Classic writings by legendary business leaders. Wiley.
33. Lee, J. (2018). 1MDB, Civil Society, and the Dawn of Malaysia’s New Era. The Round Table, 107(5), 639-641.
34. Lovelace, J. B., Neely, B. H., Allen, J. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2019). Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 96-110.
35. Mauzy, D. K., & Milne, R. S. (1983). The Mahathir administration in Malaysia: discipline through Islam. Pacific Affairs, 56(4), 617-648.
36. Mauzy, Diane K. “The Human Rights and ‘Asian values’ debate in Southeast Asia: trying to clarify the key issues.” The Pacific Review 10.2 (1996): 210−36.
37. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117.
38. Means, G. P. (1976). Malaysian politics. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
39. Milne, R.S. and Mauzy, Diane K. Malaysian Politics under Mahathir. London: Routledge, 1999.
40. Milner, Anthony. “What’s Happened to Asian Values?” Beyond the Asia Crisis. David Goodman and Gerald Segal. Eds. New York: Routledge, 1999.
41. Mohamad, M., & Ibrahim, D. (1994). Arkitek negara: hero bangsa, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Wajah Kota (M).
42. Mutu, M. (2019). Māori Issues. The Contemporary Pacific, 31(1), 202-211.
43. Nadzri, M. M. (2018). The 14th General Election, the Fall of Barisan Nasional, and Political Development in Malaysia, 1957-2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 139-171.
44. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948.
45. O'Connell, P. K. (2014). A simplified framework for 21st century leader development. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 183-203.
46. Omar, R., & Pandian, S. (2006). Falsafah pemikiran politik Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 4(2).
47. Ong, H. T. (2005). A Doctor’s Duty is to Heal the Unhealthy: The Story of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34, 45C-51C.
48. Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin's populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62-83.
49. Renwick, N. (2007). Southeast Asia and the global ‘war on terror’discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(2), 249-265.
50. Rodman, P. W. (2000). The world's resentment: Anti-Americanism as a global phenomenon. The National Interest, (60), 33-41.
51. Rohman, M. A., & Sabri, A. Z. S. A. (2017). Kempen “Kepimpinan melalui Teladan” semasa Era Pemerintahan Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad di Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(2).
52. Ruzgar, N. (2019). Moon Jae In: A Contemporary Strategıc and Vısıonary Leader. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 6(2), 5291-5296.
53. Sani, M., & Azizuddin, M. (2013). Politico-Religious Values in Malaysia: Comparing Asian Values and Islam Hadhari. Cultura, 10(1), 141-166.
54. Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Härtel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I. (2016). Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 125-139.
55. Sierra-Correa, P. C., & Kintz, J. R. C. (2015). Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts. Marine Policy, 51, 385-393.
56. Suhaimy, K. A. M. (2009). Pemikiran pembangunan berteraskan system nilai budaya: Kajian terhadap Pendekatan Dr. Mahathir Mohamad 1981-1986. Universiti Utara Malaysia: Ph.D. Thesis.
57. Suppiah, S. M., Ahmad, M. K., & Gunasekaran, H. N. (2018). Mahathir's Leadership Communication: Exploring the Indians’ Community Experience. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2).
58. TIME 100: The Most Influential People of 2019. (2019, April 17). Time Magazine. Retrieved April 25,
2019, from http://time.com/collection/100-most-influential-people-2019/
59. Ukin, L., Efendi, D., & Ahmad, Z. (2012). DASAR PEMBANGUNAN DI INDONESIA DAN
MALAYSIA: SUATU ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategy, 39(2).
60. van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891.
61. Vatikiotis, M. (1992). The Mahathir Paradox. Far Eastern Economic Review, 155, 16-18.
62. Winston, B. E. (2002). Be a leader for God's sake: From values to behaviors. Regent University, School of Leadership Studies.
63. Wong, C. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2018). Introduction: How Did Malaysia End UMNO’s 61 Years of One- Party Rule? What’s Next?, The Round Table, 107(6), 661-667.
64. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
65. Yeung, A. W. K. (2019). Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and publishers for mislabelled review papers. Current Science (00113891), 116(11).
66. Keling, Zainal. “UMNO and BN in the 2004 Election: The Political Culture of Complex Identities.” Malaysia: Recent Trends and Challenges, Saw Swee-Hock and K. Kesavapany. Eds. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006.
67. Park, J. -., & Hong, J. -. (2019). An examination on the effect of self-efficacy of ICT SMES employees on job immersion-the mediating effects of emotional leadership and the moderating effects of LMX. Test Engineering and Management, 81(11-12), 412-421. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
68. Priatna, D. K., & Roswinna, W. (2019). Influence leadership motivation and performance of employees at bank rakyat indonesia subang branch office. Test Engineering and Management, 81(11-12), 3620- 3635. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
69. Lee, S., & You, Y. -. (2019). The impact of consultant capabilities on leadership and intent to re- participation-a study on the leadership effectiveness in the industrial innovation movement –. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(3), 134-142. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
70. Nivetha, P., Prasanth, S., Ramapriya, M., & Sudhamathi, S. (2019). Emotional leadership in banks-an empirical study with reference to selected banks of sivaganga district. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(19), 1307-1318. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.