ONOMASTICS STUDY FOR CATS GIVEN NAMES IN JORDAN

Authors

  • MAISA S JABER Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xqs7xp37

Keywords:

Onomastics, given name,, ,  stray cats,, purebred cats

Abstract

he study reported here is within the field of Onomastics that explores pet cat given names in one Arabic speaking community. To achieve the goal of the study, 153 pet cat names were collected through the means of a questionnaire distributed on the Facebook page Ask Jordan. The study shows that the names of cats in Jordan can be classified into different categories: the cat’s appearance, cartoon or movie character references, the cat’s gender, classic names, new names and finally, circumstantial names. Moreover, the study reveals that stray cats can have different names from purebred house cats. Finally, the study suggests that future research should examine pet cat names in other countries.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Jumaily, Abdul Latif and Nidham, Hameed. 2014. Animal names as people’s names: A Socio-Cultural study. The English literature Journal, 1 (1). 1-5.

2. American Name Society. Available from: http://www.americannamesociety.org/names/ (Accessed 20th December 2017)

3. Barnabas, Luka and John Peter. 2013. A morphosemantic analysis of the Kamue personal names. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics research, 1 (2). 1-12.

4. Bolatovna, Aray, and Narmukhametova Maratovna. 2013. Traditional names of animals in English and Kazakh languages. Available from http://enu.kz/repository/repository2012/TRADITIONAL- NAMES.pdf (Accessed 15 th December 2017)

5. Borkfelt, Sune. 2011. What’s in a name? Consequences of naming non-human animals. Animals 1. 116- 125

6. Bright, William. 2003. What IS a name? Reflections on onomastics. Language and Linguistics 4 (4). 669- 681.

7. Ferris, Stewart and Alastair Williams. 2005. Rudest Place Names. Crombie Jardine: United Kingdom.

8. Gardner, Shenna.1995. 'Namesakes, euphony and linguistic meaning: Trends in their relative influence over name-giving'. Onomastica Canadiana 77. 1-17

9. Hajdú, Mihály. 2003. The History of Onomastics. Onomastica Uralica 2. 7-45. Avialable from: http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/nevtan/tagozat/06hajdu.pdf Accessed 15 th December 2017)

10. Hearne Vicki. 2007. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York: Skyhorse Publishing

11. J. A. A. 1896. Sclater on Rules for Naming Animals. The Auk, 13(4). 325-328. Available from: https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/auk/v013n04/p0325-p0328.pdf [Accessed: 19th Dec 2017].

12. Nissan, Ebraham and Ghil’ad Zuckermann. 2011. Recycling proper names into zoonyms as a neologisation device: Coinages by Abramowitsch (1866,1872)’. Proc. ICONN2, pp. 841–853. ‘Recycling proper names into zoonyms as a neologisation device: Coinages by Abramowitsch

13. Rybatzki, Volker. 2012. From Animal to Name: Remarks on the Semantics of Middle Mongolian Personal Name. Memoires de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne, 26(4): 333-338.

14. Terashima, Hideaki. (2003). ‘Names, use and attributes of plants and animals among the Ituri forest forgers: A comparative ethnobotanical and ethnozoological study’. African Study Monographs 28: 7-24.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

JABER, M. S. (2020). ONOMASTICS STUDY FOR CATS GIVEN NAMES IN JORDAN. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 5991-6000. https://doi.org/10.61841/xqs7xp37