Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Entrepreneurial Intention for Bidikmisi scholarship Students in Jambi University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9f3szf54Keywords:
Factor Analysis, , Entrepreneurial Intention,, Bidikmisi Scholarship,, Validity and ReliabilityAbstract
This study examined the validity and reliability of the instrument to determine Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention Among Jambi University students, the recipients of Bidikmisi Scholarship. A total of 250 students participated, selected using cluster random sampling. Survey design was used to investigate the structure of Entrepreneurial Intention factors. Quantitative data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using SPSS 23 and AMOS 23. EFA revealed a similar structure from previous studies and this study. The CFA approach verified the questionnaire concerning Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention was satisfying for the context of students at Jambi University. This work concludes that factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention of Indonesian students has a four-factor structure. These findings imply the greater importance of validating and confirming the structure of students’ Entrepreneurial Intention relative to translating a construct into a different language.
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
3. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
4. Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 1(3‐4), 233-237.
5. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of Management
Review, 13(3), 442–453.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge.
7. Chua, Y. P. (2014). Ujian regresi, analisis faktor, dan analisis SEM. Shah Alam: McGraw Hill Education.
8. Creswell, J. (2012). Education Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston, MA: Person Education.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
10. Fitzgerald, S. M., Rumrill, P. D., & Schenker, J. D. (2004). Perspectives on scientific inquiry causal- comparative research designs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 143–150.
11. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of operations management, 19(2), 185-200.
13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Katz, J. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research. In Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research (pp. 1-10). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
16. Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18(1), 5-21.
17. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 593-617.
18. Liñán, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccola Impresa/Small Business, 2004(3), 11–35.
19. Lee, S. H., & Wong, P. K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: A career anchor perspective. Journal of business venturing, 19(1), 7-28.
20. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to using SPSS for windows (version 12). New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
21. Paulina, I. Wardoyo. 2012. Faktor Pendukung terhadap Intensi Berwirausaha pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 3(1), 1-10.
22. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modelling: Third Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
23. Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, 72-90.
24. Shapero, A. (1984). The entrepreneurial event. CA Kent (ed) The Enviroment for Entrepreneurship. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
25. Wijaya, T. 2008, Kajian Model Empiris Perilaku Berwirausaha UKM DIY dan Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 93-104.
26. Zimmerer, K. S. (2012). The indigenous Andean concept of kawsay, the politics of knowledge and development, and the borderlands of environmental sustainability in Latin America. Pmla, 127(3), 600- 606
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
