Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning

Authors

  • Pushpendra Faujdar Arya Institute of Engineering And Technology, Jaipur, Raj. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/2vg6av27

Keywords:

Bias and Fairness,, Ethical Implication, Equitable Outcomes,, ,Unintended Consequences,, : Pervasive Applications

Abstract

This look at delves into the crucial area of Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning, aiming to scrutinize methodologies for the identification and relief of biases within algorithms, with a vital consciousness on making sure equitable results. As gadget studying applications grow to be an increasing number of pervasive in decision-making processes throughout numerous sectors, the need to address and rectify biases inside algorithms is paramount for fostering equity and mitigating accidental consequences.

The research concentrates on exploring approaches to locate biases embedded in system getting to know fashions, acknowledging that biases can rise up from historic data, unsuitable version design, or inadvertent algorithmic decisions. The identity manner entails growing strong strategies to evaluate and quantify biases, making sure a comprehensive knowledge of the elements influencing algorithmic effects. By spotting and characterizing biases, the look at pursuits to contribute to a extra nuanced comprehension of the ethical implications related to algorithmic selection-making.

Furthermore, the research investigates strategies to mitigate biases as soon as diagnosed. This includes refining algorithms and adjusting model parameters to rectify imbalances, with the final intention of selling fair and impartial predictions. The study recognizes that addressing bias is an iterative technique, requiring ongoing refinement to maintain pace with evolving statistics dynamics and societal modifications.

A vital thing of this studies is the exploration of fairness-improving mechanisms within device learning frameworks. This consists of growing algorithms that explicitly account for fairness considerations, ensuring that the effect of selections is equitable throughout diverse demographic businesses. The take a look at scrutinizes one-of-a-kind fairness metrics and explores their software to evaluate and decorate algorithmic equity.

By losing light on bias detection, mitigation strategies, and equity concerns, this research contributes to the continuing communicate surrounding the accountable deployment of gadget learning technologies. The outcomes of this study maintain implications for policymakers, builders, and stakeholders, emphasizing the significance of embedding fairness concepts in the material of device getting to know structures to promote just and equitable outcomes in numerous real- global packages.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Nazanin Alipourfard, Peter G. Fennell, and Kristina Lerman. 2018. Can you trust the trend? Discovering Simpson’s paradoxes in social data. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 19–27.

2. Nazanin Alipourfard, Peter G. Fennell, and Kristina Lerman. 2018. Using Simpson’s paradox to discover interesting

patterns in behavioral data. In Proceedings of the 12th International AAAI Conference on Web and social media.

3. Asuncion and D. J. Newman. 2007. UCI Machine Learning Repository. Retrieved from http://www.ics.uci.edu/$∖sim$mlearn/{MLR}epository.html.

4. Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2018. Bias on the web. Commun. ACM 61, 6 (May 2018), 54–61. DOI:DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3209581

5. Samuel Barbosa, Dan Cosley, Amit Sharma, and Roberto M Cesar Jr. 2016. Averaging gone wrong: Using time- aware analyses to better understand behavior. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 829–841.

6. Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Kuntal Dey, Michael Hind, Samuel C. Hoffman, Stephanie Houde, Kalapriya Kannan, Pranay Lohia, Jacquelyn Martino, Sameep Mehta, Aleksandra Mojsilovic et al. 2018. AI fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01943 (2018).

7. Emily M. Bender and Batya Friedman. 2018. Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Ling. 6 (2018), 587–604. DOI:DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00041

8. R. K. Kaushik Anjali and D. Sharma, "Analyzing the Effect of Partial Shading on Performance of Grid Connected Solar PV System", 2018 3rd International Conference and Workshops on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), pp. 1-4, 2018.

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

Faujdar, P. (2020). Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 56503-56506. https://doi.org/10.61841/2vg6av27