The Language of F. D. Roosevelt’s ‘Pearl Harbour Address to the Nation’ Persuasive Call to Arms Discourse: A Rhetorical Criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b906nj64Keywords:
Call to Arms Discourse, Rhetoric, Politeness, Political SpeechesAbstract
The aim of this work is to analyze the representative speeches of F. D. Roosevelt with a view to getting some meaningful insight into the political oratory (call to arms) in general and of the speaker in particular. The focus of this work is on identifying various linguistic strategies used in the 'Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation’ for realizing various persuasive strategies, intentions, and sub-intentions. For doing so, a model of analysis has been developed to include Aristotelian and Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. This is to understand F. D. Roosevelt’s rhetoric and politeness strategies, which they have used in persuading the masses and influencing their decisions. Hence, this work makes some meaningful observations about persuasive strategies and speech delivery styles of the said orator. In terms of findings, the analysis found that the major intention of the speech and speaker was to persuade the audience to change/affect their view or to take some action as intended by the orator (i.e., persuade the congress to declare war against Japan). Besides that, various strategies have been used to realize these sub-intentions. However, some of these strategies and intentions/sub-intentions have been found interlinked, as they have mostly been found to occur together.
Downloads
References
Benwell, B. (1999) “The Organization of Knowledge in British University Tutorial Discourse: Issues, Pedagogic Discourse Strategies, and Disciplinary Identity.” In Pragmatics, 9 (4), (pp. 535-565).
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulmas, F. (2005) Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foss, S. K. (1996) Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration & Practice (2nd ed.). Illinois: Waveland Press.
Fox, B. A. (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grote, B., E. Hagen, A. Stein & E. Teich (1997a). “Speech Productionon in Human-Machine Dialogue: A Natural Language Generation Perspective.” In E. Maier, M. Mast, and S. Luperfoy (Eds.), Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems (pp. 70-85). Berlin: Springer.
Grote, B., N. Lenke & M. Stede. (1997b) “Ma(r)king Concessions in English and German.” In Discourse Processes, 24 (pp. 87-117).
Katea, H. (2018). Understanding Discursive Persuasion in American and Iraqi Call to Arms Discourse: Discursive Strategies as Instruments of Persuasive Politics (Doctoral dissertation, Bangor University).
Kennedy, G. A (Trans.) (2007)Aristotle On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, (2nd Ed.) Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Long, J. (2011) “Critical Discourse Analysis of Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech.” In Journal of Kaili University, 4. Retrieved on 21 July 2020
<http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-QDNS201104035.htm>
Mann, B. (1999) “An Introduction to Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST)”
Mann, W.C., & S.A. Thompson (1988) “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. In Text, 8 (3) (pp. 243-281).
Muralikrishnan, T.R. (2011). “Critical Discourse Analysis: Politics and Verbal Coding.” In Language in India. Retrieved on 15th Feb. 2019
http://www.languageinindia.com/may2011/muralikrishnan.pdf
Roosevelt, F. D. (8th Dec. 1941). “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation” (Text and Speech) Retrieved on 12 Aug. 2019 www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrpearlharbor.htm
Watts, R. J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
