The Authority of Institutions to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/5my32g80Keywords:
Role, Corruption Eradication Commission, Eradication, Corruption, IndonesiaAbstract
The formation of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) aims to facilitate and accelerate the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission gives a very broad authority so that the KPK is called a "superbody" institution that has 5 tasks and 29 extraordinary powers. However, part of the authority is now limited, so it is feared that the role of the KPK in eradicating corruption in Indonesia will stagnate. After Law No. 30 of 2002 was revised into Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Corruption Eradication Commission became a state institution in the executive power cluster that is independent and free from the influence of any power, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) employee is a state civil apparatus (ASN) as referred to in the legislation concerning the state civil apparatus. Before the revision, the KPK was independent, and the KPK employees were recruited independently and became permanent KPK employees. After the revision, the KPK can stop the investigation and prosecution of corruption cases, and the KPK no longer has the authority to appoint and dismiss investigators as investigators at the KPK. All KPK activities are supervised by the Supervisory Board so that the wiretapping is carried out after obtaining written permission from the Supervisory Board.
Downloads
References
1. Achmad. (2013). Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yustisia, 2(1), 57–65.
2. Alkostar, A. (2013). Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crime. Training Pengarusutamaan Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Bagi Hakim Seluruh Indonesia, 1–21. Yogyakarta: Mahkamah Agung.
3. Atmasasmita, R. (2002). Korupsi, Good Governance dan Komisi Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI.
4. Cees, S. (1998). Fighting Money Laundering. London: Kluwer Law International.
5. Diantha, I. M. P. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta:
Prenanda Media Group.
6. Effendy, M. (2012). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukuh Pidana.
Jakarta: Referensi Jakarta.
7. Hart, H. (2001). Anti Corruption Strategies in Indonesia. Buletin of Indonesia Economic Studies, 37(1), 65–88.
8. Harun, R. (2005). Polemik Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Masa Depan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Lex
Jurnalica, 2(3), 1–102.
9. Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan Korupsi. Yogyakarta:
Universitas Gadjah Mada.
10. Ifrani. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Jurnal Al’Adl, IX(3), 319–336.
11. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI. (2019). Kilas Berita Hukum dan Peraturan Perundangundangan.
12. Lopa, B. (2001). Kejahatan Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Kompas.
13. Mohede, N. (2012). Tugas Dan Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat,
xx(1), 67–80.
14. Mudzakkir. (2011). Laporan Akhir Tim Kompendium Hukum Tentang Lembaga Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
15. Nay. (2014). KPK Tetapkan Abdullah Puteh sebagai Tersangka Korupsi. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from hukum
online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol10616/kpk-tetapkan-abdullah-puteh-sebagaitersangka-korupsi/
16. Ramadhan, A. (2019). Ini 26 Poin dari UU KPK Hasil Revisi yang Berisiko Melemahkan KPK.
17. Rowe, S. E. (2009). Legal Research, Legal Analysis, and Legal Writing: Putting Law School into Practice.
SSRN ELibrary, 1193(2000), 1–19.
18. Rukmini, M. (2010). Aspek Pidana dan Kriminologi. Bandung: Alumni.
19. Sen, A. (1999). Development As Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Sudarmanto, B. (2009). Kebijakan Kriminal Era Pemerintahan Presiden Megawati Soekarno Putri Dalam Memerangi Korupsi di Indonesia (Suatu Bentuk Reaksi Sosial Formal Terhadap Korupsi). Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 5(1), 1–14.
21. Suraji. (2008). Sejarah Panjang Korupsi di Indonesia dan Upaya Pemberantasannya. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 135–148.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
