The Competency of English Language Teachers in Implementing the English Language Literacy Programme

Authors

  • Suhaimi Abdul Wahid School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia Author
  • Sanitah Mohd Yusof School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia Author
  • Noor Azean Atan School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malay Author
  • Halijah Ibrahim School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/k702sj24

Keywords:

Competency Level, Literacy, English Language Teacher, Knowledge, Teaching Skill, Assessment and Evaluation, LINUS Bahasa Inggeris Programme

Abstract

The teachers’ competency level was investigated from four related aspects, which are knowledge competency, teaching skills competency, assessment and evaluation competency, and professional values and behavior competency. A total of 141 English language literacy teachers from 83 primary schools in Pontian, Johor, were involved with this study. The research design is through the use of a questionnaire, which is intended to measure the competency level of respondents. Data that had been collected is analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 12.0) to find the mean, frequency, and standard deviation. ANOVA and t-tests were used to analyze the hypothesis. The findings showed that the level of competency is high for the knowledge, teaching skills, assessment and evaluation, and professional values and behavior aspects. As for the hypothesis, there are no significant differences in the competency of the English language teachers across the school zones, teaching experience, and gender factors. Implications of the study were discussed, which were then followed by a few proposals of the study to the stakeholders, such as English teachers that are involved with the LINUS Bahasa Inggeris (LBI) program, the school administrators, local education authorities (District Education Office and the State Education Department), and the Ministry of Education. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kiymet, Selvi. (2010). Teachers’ Competencies. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and

Axiology. Vol. VII, 120.1/2010.

[2] Malaysia. (1979). Cabinet Report. Malaysian Government.

[3] Malaysia. (2011). Annual Report Government Transformation Programme. Malaysian Government.

[4] Anne Muller & Murtagh, T. (Ed.). (2002). Literacy — The 877 Million Left Behind. In Education Today

(2nd ed., pp. 4–7). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 468232.

[5] Ministry of Education [MOE]. (1979). Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Pelaksanaan Dasar

Pelajaran (Penyata Razak). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

[6] Koh Boh Boon. (1981a). Pengajaran Pemulihan dalam Bahasa Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan.

[7] Ministry of Education [MOE]. (1979). Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Pelaksanaan Dasar

Pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

[8] Nazariyah Sani. (2014). Pelaksanaan Program Literasi dan Numerasi (Linus): Satu Analisis. (Unpublished

doctoral thesis). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

[9] Rahmat, R. (2012, November 25). Primary schools to get Linus 2.0 next year. Daily Express. Retrieved

October 1, 2015, from http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=83358

[10] Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). Dialog Pelaksanaan Intervensi Program Linus 2.0 Tahun 2014

Bersama JPN/PPD. Retrieved September 31, 2015, from http://www.ppdbd.edu.my/

[11] Rosseliiah Bokhari, Sabariah Md Rashid & Chan Swee Heng. (2015). Teachers’ Perception on the

Implementation of the Literacy, Numeracy and Screening (LINUS LBI 2.0) Programme among Lower

Primary ESL Pupils. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 11(1), 108-121.

Nazariyah Sani & Abdul Rahman Idris. (2013). Implementation of Linus programme based on the model of

Van Meter and Van Horn. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 25-36.

[12] National Staff Development and Training Association [NSDTA]. (2001). Human Services Staff

Development and Training Roles and Competencies: Manager. Washington, D.C., America: American

Public Human Services Association.

[13] Arnab Pan. (2014). A Study on Professional Competency in Relation to Self-Efficacy of Madrasa Teachers in West Bengal. International Journal for Research in Education. 3 (4). 26–31.

[14] Sukla Roy Choudhury & Susanta Roy Chowdhury. (2015). Teaching Competency of Secondary Teacher Educators in Relation to Their Metacognition Awareness. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 4 (1). 17–23.

[15] Manullang (2002). Dasar-dasar Manajeman, Ghalia Publisher, Indonesia.

[16] Tillman, C. Linda (2002). Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective. American Educational Research Association.

[17] M. Nur Mustafa. (2013). Professional Competency Differences among High School Teachers in Indonesia. International Education Studies. 6 (9). 83–92.

[18] Anderson, R. John. (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (Seventh Edition). Carnegie Mellon University. Worth Publisher.

[19] N. Bakalis, G.S. Bowman, D. Parock. (2003). Decision Making in Greek and English Registered Nurses in Coronary Care Units. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Vol. 40, Issue 7, September 2003, Pages 749-760.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

Abdul Wahid, S., Mohd Yusof, S., Azean Atan, N., & Ibrahim, H. (2020). The Competency of English Language Teachers in Implementing the English Language Literacy Programme. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5518-5526. https://doi.org/10.61841/k702sj24