Promoting Multi Literacy Pedagogy in Teaching Reading in Indonesian Higher Education

Authors

  • Ummi Khaerati Syam Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xsc6y498

Keywords:

Multi Literacy Pedagogy, Teaching Reading, Multi Literacies

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries where students have a low reading interest. Therefore, teaching reading in universities needs an appropriate strategy to engage students’ attention in learning reading to achieve high interest in reading. Multi-literacy pedagogy is a multimodal way of communication that includes technology and multimedia in teaching so that it offers a new classroom pedagogy that extends and helps manage classrooms. This study aimed at finding out how the Indonesian lecturers apply their understandings and experiences with multi-literacy pedagogy in their classroom teaching, particularly in teaching reading. The data were obtained by distributing an open-ended questionnaire to 20 Reading lecturers who were selected randomly from a population of 100 at Muhammadiyah universities in Makassar, Indonesia. The result of the data analysis showed that the Reading lecturers applied their understandings and experiences with multi literacy pedagogy in the form of: 1) situated practice by encouraging and motivating students to discuss and share ideas about the lessons within a small group of students in the classroom; 2) overt instruction with which the lecturers suggest the students to use ‘graphical concept map features’ for creating an interactive concept-map of their classroom learning; 3) critical framing in which the lecturers encourage students to notice and analyze practices of communicating meaningful ideas in schools and groups; and 4) transformed practice where the teachers encourage students to connect their learning experiences with their daily classroom lessons. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] OECD/ADB. Reviews of National Policies for Education in Indonesia; Rising to the

Challenge Publishing, Paris, 2015.

[2] J. Alsup, Teacher Identity Discourses: Negotiating Personal and Professional Spaces (NCTE-Routledge

Research Series. Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2008. ISBN-13: 978-0805858532.

[3] D. Rianti, K. S. Loukia, Indonesian Pre-Service Teachers‟ Identities in a Microteaching Context: Learning

to teach English to an Indonesian teacher. Education Program Faculty Publications: Department of

Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education Department of Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education.

University of Nebraska – Lincoln Digital Commons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln, 2016.

[4] Y. A. Pradana, Analisa Penyebab Penggunaan Model Konvensional Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab

Kelas XI dan XII MAN Wates 1 Kulon Progo. Thesis. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan. UIN Sunan

Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 2016.

[5] F. Sentosa, A. Rina, Linking Pre-service Teacher Education and In-service Teacher Training for Effective

Results in Indonesia. USAID-PRIORITAS of Indonesia), 2012.

[6] G. G. Gustine, Critical Literacy in an Indonesian EFL Setting: Sustaining Professional Learning. Dean

University of Australia. Thesis access, 2014.

[7] New London Group, A pedagogy of multi literacies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational

Review. Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 60-92, 1996.

[8] K. A. Mills, Multi literacies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, Vol. 23, No. 2,

pp. 103-116, 2009.

[9] J. Cummins, K. Brown, D. Sayers, Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing

times. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson, 2007.

[10] L. Ajayi, A multi literacies pedagogy: Exploring semiotic possibilities of a Disney video in a third-grade

diverse classroom. The Urban Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 396-413, 2011.

[11] M. Newman, The designs of academic literacy: A multi-literacies examination of academic achievement.

Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002.

[12] J. L. Pennington, C. H. Brock, T. Palmer, L. Wolters, Opportunities to teach: confronting the deskilling of

teachers through the development of teacher knowledge of multiple literacies. Teachers and Teaching, Vol.

19, No. 1, pp. 63-77, 2013.

[13] G. E. Jacobs, The Proverbial Rock and Hard Place: The Realities and Risks of Teaching in a World of

Multi-literacies, Participatory Culture, and Mandates. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 56, No.

2, pp. 98-102, 2012. d

[14] B. Alexander, Web 2.0 and Emergent Multi literacies. Theory Into Practice, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 150-160,

2008.

[15] J. Evans, Literacy moves on: Popular culture, new technologies, and critical literacy in the elementary

Classroom. Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, 2005.

[16] J. Egbert, Two Faces of Technology Use. Essential Teacher, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 37-40, 2004.

[17] R. M. Jaeger, Complementary Methods for Research in Education, 2nd Edition. American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC, 1997.

[18] H. Rubin, I. Rubin, Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.

[19] M. Kalantzis, B. I. L. L. Cope, Language education and multi literacies. Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 1, pp. 195-211, 2008.

[20] S. Taberski, On Solid Ground: Strategies for Teaching Reading K-3. Heinemann. Portsmouth, NH, 2000.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

Khaerati Syam, U. (2020). Promoting Multi Literacy Pedagogy in Teaching Reading in Indonesian Higher Education. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 657-664. https://doi.org/10.61841/xsc6y498