Gender Theory and The Influence of Household Dynamics on Child Care and Feeding Practices In Andhra Pradesh

Authors

  • Suvarchala M. Lecturer in Home Science, ASD Government Degree College for women(A), Kakinada, AP Author
  • Dr. Yamuna Kilaru Lecturer in Economics, ASD Government Degree College for Women(A) Kakinada Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/hz9fjj87

Keywords:

Socio-cultural, Autonomy, Caregivers, Intersection, Dependencies

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of gender theory and household dynamics in shaping childcare and feeding practices in Andhra Pradesh, India. By conducting qualitative and quantitative research methods, including interviews, surveys, and participant observations, the research investigates how traditional gender roles and power structures within households influence decisions related to child nutrition and care. The findings reveal that women, despite being primary caregivers, often lack autonomy in making significant child-rearing decisions due to patriarchal norms and economic dependencies. This lack of agency impacts the nutritional status and overall well-being of children. The study also examines the role of extended family members and community networks in reinforcing or challenging these gendered practices. The insights gained from this research highlight the need for policy interventions that address gender inequalities and empower women to improve child health outcomes. The study contributes to the broader discourse on gender, health, and development by providing a nuanced understanding of the socio-cultural factors influencing childcare and feeding practices in a specific regional context. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agarwal, B. (1997). "Bargaining" and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics,

3(1), 1-51.

2. Bhattacharya, P. C. (2006). Economic development, gender inequality, and demographic outcomes: Evidence from

India. Population and Development Review, 32(2), 263-291.

3. Caldwell, J. C. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 171-

220.

4. Choudhary, N., & Parthasarathy, R. (2007). Gender, Work, and Household Food Security. Economic and Political

Weekly, 42(6), 523-531.

5. Das Gupta, M. (1995). Life course perspectives on women's autonomy and health outcomes. American

Anthropologist, 97(3), 481-491.

6. Desai, S., & Johnson, K. (2005). Women's decision-making and child health: Familial and social hierarchies. In S.

Kishor, Ed. A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 55-68). ORC Macro.

7. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India.

Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35-60.

8. Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., & Alderman, H. (1997). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries:

Models, methods, and policy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

9. Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995). Women's education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. Clarendon Press.

10. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment.

Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464.

11. Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274-290.

12. Kishor, S., & Gupta, K. (2009). Gender equality and women's empowerment in India. National Family Health

Survey (NFHS-3) India 2005-06. International Institute for Population Sciences.

13. Mason, K. O. (1986). The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies.

Sociological Forum, 1(2), 284-300.

14. Mies, M. (1982). The Lace Makers of Narsapur: Indian Housewives Produce for the World Market. Zed Books.

15. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.

16. Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent Inequalities: Women and World

Development (pp. 123-149). Oxford University Press.

17. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.

18. Strauss, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions. In J.

Behrman & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1883-2023). Elsevier.

19. UNICEF. (2019). The State of the World's Children 2019: Children, Food, and Nutrition—Growing Well in a Changing World. UNICEF.

20. World Bank. (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

M., S., & Kilaru, Y. (2020). Gender Theory and The Influence of Household Dynamics on Child Care and Feeding Practices In Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 8014-8018. https://doi.org/10.61841/hz9fjj87