An Analysis of the Relationship between the Good Governance Model and Anti-corruption Policy (With Emphasis on Developing Nations)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ft7s4y36Keywords:
Good governance, developing countries, motives, policiesAbstract
The programs and policies of anti-corruption and good governance, which are supported by international institutions like the World Bank, decide the vital goals of developing nations. Therefore, there is no doubt in the need for good governance. In fact, the present paper will address the following questions: To what extent are these goals the only necessary ones for the development of good governance prerequisites? Are such objectives certainly attainable in emerging nations? Moreover, would concentrating on such issues of governance divert our attention from more feasible and persistent reforms that could make the governance goals easier to achieve for us? Generally, during development, making reforms for an upright governance and focusing on corruption normally diverts the attention from those policies that are practical. Even though emergent nations have different categories of corruption that not a single country could fight with immediately. Hence, this is dynamic to obtain essential capacity of governance for the identification and handling of the most vicious types. Consequently, a framework’s presence for acknowledging all sorts of corruption stays essential for a purpose to decide priorities of institutional reform and put in place successful policies to combat corruption. The research methodology of this paper is descriptive/analytical, and the data have been collected using available documents and information.
Downloads
References
1. Araee, Vahid, 2009, “Good Governance as Cause of Monitoring and Assessment,” A
Research Report from the Research and Planning Department of the Inspection
Organization of Iran, 2nd Year, 6th issue.
2. Jasbi, Javad and Neda Nafari, 2009, “Designing a Model of Good Governance Based on
the Theory of Open Systems,” Irna, Management Sciences Quarterly, 4th Year, 16th
Issue.
3. Farrokhseresht, Behzad, 2004, “A Study of Factors Contributing to Administrative
Corruption,” Tehran, Tehran University’s Faculty of Management.
4. Gharani, Mohammad et al, 2010, “A Study and Analysis of the relation between
Corruption and Principles of Good Governance and the Impact of Organizational
Culture (Case Study: Administrative Corruption), Collection of Papers of Conference on
Boosting Administrative Health, Tehran, Zaman No Publications.
5. Gholipour, Rahmatollah, 2005, “A Study of the Relation between Good Governance
Model and Administrative Corruptio”n, Culture of Management, 3rd Year, 10th Issue.
6. Kermani, Majid and Mehdi Baskha, 2009, “The Role of Good Governance in Improving
the Functioning of Government Costs-Case Study: The Health and Education Sectors of
Islamic Countries,” Economic Research, 44 (2007).
7. Meydari, Ahmad, 2002, “Compatibility between Types of Corporate Governance and the Iranian Economy,” Doctoral Thesis, Tehran, the Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran.
8. Meydari, Ahmad and Jaffar Kheyrkhahan, 2004, “Good Governance: Pillar of Development,” Tehran, the Majlis’s Research Center.
9. Knack, S., and Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics, 7 (3): 207-227.
10. Krueger, AO (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. American Economic Review, 64 (3): 291-303.
11. Rodrik, D., ed. (2003). In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12. Rose-Ackerman S (1978). Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.
13. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3):599-617.
22. World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford University Press publication, Oxford
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
