Investigating Iraqi EFL University Students' Understanding of Assertive Verbs with Reference to Assertion Acts in Political Context: A PragmaSyntactic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dt5wmp52Keywords:
Assertive Verbs, Speech Act: Assertion, Gender variation, Iraqi EFL learners’ performanceAbstract
This paper scrutinizes Iraqi EFL university students’ ability in understanding and recognizing the expressions of assertion in political assertive situations. The study investigates the use of assertive verbs in assertive situation(s) in English sentences as used by Iraqi EFL university students with reference to a speech act of assertion. In pursuing this aim, the investigated data has been captured from undergraduate Iraqi EFL college fourth-year students of Thi-Qar University, Colleges of Education and Arts, Department of English. It encompasses 50 Iraqi EFL university students wherein Arabic is their mother tongue. The data were divided into two groups, and each group consists of 25 students (i.e., participants) to touch briefly on the speech act of assertion.
The study takes into consideration the gender of the participants while enforcing assertion. Accordingly, the participants are asked to give careful attention to the gender variety and its influence on the execution of the speech act of assertion in assertive situation(s). The instrument of data collection is Discourse Completion Tasks (DCTs). It consists of 8 different written situations. Because the DCTs can be translated into any language, the results, findings, and outcomes are shown in percentages and then visualized in tables and figures. Based on an in-depth reading of the empirical evidence(s) from our qualitative and quantitative analysis, the study mainly found that assertion can be recognized and expressed in different sentence types with different degrees in political situations for a persuasive end. (For more results and findings, see section 4).
Downloads
References
Akmajian, A., Demers, R.A., Frame, A.K., and Harnish, R.M. (2001). Linguistics: An Introduction to
Language and Communication. London: The MIT Press.
Angouri, J. (2010) Quantitative, Qualitative, or Both? Combining Methods in
Linguistic Research. In Litosseliti, L. (ed.) Research Methods in Linguistics.
London: Continuum.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a
study abroad context (Vol. 108). John Benjamins Publishing.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and
Written English. China: Longman.
Clark, J.O.E. (1989). English Synonyms. Great Britain: Harrap Books Ltd.
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1994). Researching the production of second-language speech acts. Research
methodology in second-language acquisition, 143-156.
Cruse, A. (2000). Meaning in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 5th ed. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Downing, A. and Locke, P. (2006). 2nd ed. English Grammar: A University Course . New York: Routledge.
Eastwood, J. (1994). Oxford Guide to English Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eckersley, C. and Eckersley, J. (1960). A Comprehensive English Grammar for Foreign Students. London:
Longman.
Feigenbaum, I. (1985). The Grammar Handbook. The United
Foley, M. and Hall, D. (2003). Longman Advanced Learner's Grammar. London: Person Education Ltd.
Frank, M. (1993). Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. United States of America: New Jersey.
Horn, L. and Warq, G. (eds.) (2004). The Handbook of Pragmatics. United
Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., and Smith, M. B. (2007). A course book in semantics. 2nd ed. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Jespersen, O. (1968). The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., Kingdom:
Blackwell publishing Ltd.
Leech, G. (2001). An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage. London: Arnold.
Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1994). A Communicative Grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
MacFarlane, J. (2009). 'What is Assertion.' [http://www.johnmacfarlane.net/assertion.dpf].
Macmillan, (1964). The Key to English Verbs. New York: Macmillian Publishing Co. Ltd
Manser, M.H. (ed). (2005). Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. London:
Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd.
Mey, J. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Ogiermann, E. (2018). Discourse completion tasks. Methods in pragmatics, 229-255.
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. and Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching the Language
of Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.
Palmer, F.R. (1981). Semantics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parrot, M. (2000). Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. (1973). A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. Great Britain: Seminar
Press.
Searl, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
States of America: Oxford University Press.
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage. 3d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teschner, R.V. and Evans, E.E. (2007). Analyzing the Grammar of English.
Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Thomson, A. J. and Martinet, A.V. (1986). A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker, E. and Elsworth, S. (2000). Grammar Practice. Spain: Person Education Limited.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
