THIRD MOLAR IMPACTION AS A PREDISPOSING FACTOR IN ANGLE OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Priyadharshini Suresh Babu Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai - 600077 Author
  • Gifrina Jayaraj Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai - 600077 Author
  • Geo Mani Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai - 600077 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xxzkq794

Keywords:

Impaction, third molar, mandibular fracture

Abstract

Aim: The mandibular angle and condylar region are most prone to fracture, and this has been attributed to the presence and absence of the third molar. There was a definitive positive relation between impacted third molar and increased incidence of angle fractures. Third molar impaction acts as a predisposing factor to angle fracture. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of third molar impaction on the mandible angle fracture. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic findings of the patients with the angle of mandibular fracture during the time period of June 2019 to March 2020 by reviewing 86,000 patient records of those who visited Saveetha Dental College in Chennai. The total sample of mandibular angle fracture obtained was 19. The data was tabulated and entered in Excel. Chi-square analysis was done using SPSS package software. The variable impact of the third molar and side of the mandibular angle fracture was compared. In the study, p<0.05 was considered to be the level of statistical significance.

Results: Among the 77 maxillofacial fracture data collected, only 62.3% of the fractures were found to be mandibular fractures. The fracture that occurred in the angle region of the mandible was 44.1%. 31.6% of the third molars were impacted, whereas 68.4% were non-impacted teeth. There is a higher incidence of mandibular fractures in males compared to that of females. The most common age group was 31-40 years. A chi-square test was done, and the p-value obtained was 0.252, which is >0.05. There was no significant difference between the presence of an impacted third molar and an angular fracture of the mandible.

Conclusion : In this study it is observed that the mandibular fracture is more prevalent in males with right mandibular angle fractures in both impacted lower third molars. The presence of a third molar contributes to the increased mandibular fragility, which leads to mandibular fracture. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Srinivasan B, Balakrishna R, Sudarshan H, Veena GC, Prabhakar S. Retrospective analysis of 162

Mandibular fractures: An institutional experience [Internet]. Vol. 9, Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery.

2019. p. 124.

2. Sand L, Gavelin P, Hirsch J, Ramadhan A. A retrospective study of patients with mandibular fractures

treated at a Swedish University Hospital, 1999-2008 [Internet]. Vol. 4, Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery.

2014, p. 178.

3. Thelekkat Y, Schubert W. Mandible Fractures [Internet]. Operative Plastic Surgery. 2019. p. 553–80.

4. Maliska MC de S, de Souza Maliska MC, Júnior SML, Gil JN. Analysis of 185 maxillofacial fractures in

The state of Santa Catarina, Brazil [Internet]. Vol. 23, Brazilian Oral Research. 2009. p. 268–74.

5. Aksoy E, Ünlü E, Şensöz Ö. A Retrospective Study on Epidemiology and Treatment of Maxillofacial

Fractures [Internet]. Vol. 13, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2002. p. 772–5.

6. Beale V, Holland I. The use of Inion resorbable plates for the fixation of mandibular fractures [Internet].

Vol. 45, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007. p. e43.

7. Paza AO, Abuabara A, Passeri LA. Analysis of 115 Mandibular Angle Fractures [Internet]. Vol. 66,

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008. p. 73–6.

8. Menon S, Kumar V, Srihari V, Priyadarshini Y. Correlation of Third Molar Status with Incidence of

Condylar and Angle Fractures [Internet]. Vol. 9, Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2016. p.

224–8.

9. Halmos DR, Ellis E, Dodson TB. Mandibular third molars and angle fractures [Internet]. Vol. 62, Journal

of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2004. p. 1076–81.

10. Sakr K, Farag IA, Zeitoun IM. Review of 509 mandibular fractures treated at the University Hospital,

Alexandria, Egypt. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;44(2):107–11.

11. Ellis E. Management of Fractures Through the Angle of the Mandible [Internet]. Vol. 21, Oral and

Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2009. p. 163–74.

12. Fuselier JC, Ellis EE 3rd, Dodson TB. Do mandibular third molars alter the risk of angular fracture? J Oral

Maxillofac Surg. 2002 May;60(5):514–8.

13. Szucs A, Bujtár P, Sándor GKB, Barabás J. Finite element analysis of the human mandible to assess the

effect of removing an impacted third molar. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a72.

14. Ribeiro J. Resenha de “discurso político” [CHARAUDEAU, P. - São Paulo: Contexto, 2006] [Internet].

Vol. 9, Linguagem em (Dis)curso. 2009. p. 181–5.

15. Sivaramakrishnan SM, Ramani P. Study on the Prevalence of Eruption Status of Third Molars in South

Indian Population [Internet]. Vol. 07, Biology and Medicine. 2015.

16. Iida S, Hassfeld S, Reuther T, Nomura K, Mühling J. Relationship between the risk of mandibular angle

fractures and the status of incompletely erupted mandibular third molars. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Jun;33(3):158–63.

17. Jayaraj G, Sherlin HJ, Ramani P, Premkumar P, Anuja N. Cytomegalovirus and Mucoepidermoid

Carcinoma: A possible causal relationship? A pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015 Sep;19(3):319–24.

18. Jangid K, Alexander AJ, Jayakumar ND, Varghese S, Ramani P. Ankyloglossia with cleft lip: A rare case

report. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Nov;19(6):690–3.

19. Shree KH, Hema Shree K, Ramani P, Herald Sherlin, Sukumaran G, Jeyaraj G, et al. Saliva as a

Diagnostic Tool in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma—a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis [Internet].

Vol. 25, Pathology & Oncology Research. 2019. p. 447–53.

20. Jayaraj G, Ramani P, Herald J, Sherlin, Premkumar P, Anuja N. Inter-observer agreement in grading oral

Epithelial dysplasia—A systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 27, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,

Medicine and Pathology. 2015. p. 112–6.

21. Gupta V, Ramani P. Histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation of mirror image biopsies in oral

squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016 Sep;6(3):194–7.

22. Thangaraj SV, Shyamsundar V, Krishnamurthy A, Ramani P, Ganesan K, Muthuswami M, et al.

Molecular Portrait of Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Shown by Integrative Meta-Analysis of

Expression Profiles with Validations. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0156582.

23. Hannah R, Ramani P, Herald J, Sherlin, Ranjith G, Ramasubramanian A, Jayaraj G, et al. Awareness

about the use, Ethics and Scope of Dental Photography among Undergraduate Dental Students Dentist

Behind the lens [Internet]. Vol. 11, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 1012.

24. Sherlin H, Ramani P, Premkumar P, Kumar A, Natesan A. Expression of CD68, CD45, and human

leukocyte antigen-DR in central and peripheral giant cell granuloma, giant cell tumor of long bones, and

tuberculous granuloma: An immunohistochemical study [Internet]. Vol. 26, Indian Journal of Dental

Research. 2015. p. 295.

25. Viveka TS, Shyamsundar V, Krishnamurthy A, Ramani P, Ramshankar V. p53 Expression Helps Identify

High-Risk Oral Tongue Premalignant Lesions and Correlates with Patterns of Invasive Tumour Front and

Tumour Depth in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cases [Internet]. Vol. 17, Asian Pacific Journal

of Cancer Prevention. 2016. p. 189–95.

26. Gheena S, Ezhilarasan D. Syringic acid triggers reactive oxygen species–mediated cytotoxicity in HepG2

cells [Internet]. Vol. 38, Human & Experimental Toxicology. 2019. p. 694–702.

27. Jayaraj G, Sherlin HJ, Ramani P, Premkumar P, Natesan A. Stromal myofibroblasts in oral squamous cell

carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders. Indian J Cancer. 2015 Jan;52(1):87–92.

28. Sridharan G, Ramani P, Patankar S, Vijayaraghavan R. Evaluation of salivary metabolomics in oral

leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Apr;48(4):299–306.

29. Sridharan G, Ramani P, Patankar S. Serum metabolomics in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell

carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017 Jul;13(3):556–61.

30. Swathy S, Gheena S, Varsha SL. Prevalence of pulp gallstones in patients with history of cardiac diseases

[Internet]. Vol. 8, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015. p. 1625.

31. Meisami T, Sojat A, Sàndor GKB, Lawrence HP, Clokie CML. Impacted third molars and risk of angle

Fracture [Internet]. Vol. 31, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2002. p. 140–4.

32. Inaoka S-D, Carneiro S-CA-S, Vasconcelos B-CE, Leal J, Porto G-G. Relationship between mandibular

fracture and impacted lower third molar. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Jul 1;14(7):E349–54.

33. Vyas A, Mazumdar U, Khan F, Mehra M, Parihar L, Purohit C. A study of mandibular fractures over a 5-

Year period of time: A retrospective study [Internet]. Vol. 5, Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2014. p.

452.

34. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Brazil: a 5-year prospective study [Internet]. Vol.

201, British Dental Journal. 2006. p. 575–575.

35. Tiwari A, Lata J, Mishra M. Influence of the impacted mandibular third molars on fractures of the

mandibular angle and condyle - A prospective clinical study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016

Sep;6(3):227–30.

36. Subhashraj K. A Study on the Impact of Mandibular Third Molars on Angle Fractures [Internet]. Vol. 67,

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009. p. 968–72.

37. Sohal K, Moshy J, Owibingire S, Simon EM. Association between impacted mandibular third molar and

occurrence of mandibular angle fracture: A radiological study [Internet]. Vol. 7, Journal of Oral and

Maxillofacial Radiology. 2019. p. 25.

38. Duarte BG, Assis D, Ribeiro-Júnior P, Gonçales ES. Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular

Do a Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes [Internet].

Vol. 5, Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2012. p. 127–35.

39. McManus IC. The history and geography of human handedness [Internet]. Language Lateralization and

Psychosis. p. 37–58.

40. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica

fragrance extract. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019; 10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Suresh Babu, P., Jayaraj, G., & Mani, G. (2020). THIRD MOLAR IMPACTION AS A PREDISPOSING FACTOR IN ANGLE OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 5251-5260. https://doi.org/10.61841/xxzkq794