Develop Human Integrity and Quality through Lecturing Management Control Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/83ranx90Keywords:
Action Control, Action Accountability, Preventive Action, Corruption, SyllabusAbstract
This study aims to identify students’ responses on the issue of management control of lecturing activities in Indonesia through discussion of case studies. The concept of management control becomes the topic of discussion in the focus group discussion (FGD) conducted during the Management Control System course at Garut University. The FGD was conducted for 150 minutes involving 10 students. The participants are from various student organizations and have different experiences in the organization. The FGD focused on the syllabus of Management Control System courses for students in the third level. The results of the FGDs showed that some materials of the Management Control System (MCS) course encouraged the students to have integrity. The materials covered management and control, planning and budgeting, and comprehensive management control. The discussion and recommendation for this course syllabus are elaborated comprehensively.
Downloads
References
1. S. Isra, Yuliandri, F. Amsari, and H. Tegnan, “Obstruction of justice in the effort to eradicate corruption in
Indonesia,” Int. J. Law, Crime Justice, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.07.001.
2. A. Persson, B. Rothstein, and J. Teorell, “Why anticorruption reforms fail: systemic corruption as a collective
action problem,” Governance, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x.
3. E. P. Lopes Júnior, S. F. Câmara, L. G. Rocha, and A. Brasil, “Influence of corruption on state-owned
enterprise expenditures,” Rev. Adm. Publica, 2018, doi: 10.1590/0034-7612173631.
4. Transparency International, “Corruption Perception Index,” https://www.transparency.org/, 2019. .
5. KPK, “Pendidikan Antikorupsi di Perguruan Tinggi,” kpk.go.id, 2020. .
6. T. O. Nyumba, K. Wilson, C. J. Derrick, and N. Mukherjee, “The use of focus group discussion methodology:
Insights from two decades of application in conservation,” Methods Ecol. Evol., 2018, doi: 10.1111/2041-
210X.12860.
7. H. S. Akareem and S. S. Hossain, “Determinants of education quality: what makes students perception
different?,” Open Rev. Educ. Res., 2016, doi: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167.
8. F. D. Billups, “Conducting Focus Groups with College Students: Strategies to Ensure Success,” Association
for Institutional Research. 2012.
9. N. Dutta and R. Sobel, “Does corruption ever help entrepreneurship?,” Small Bus. Econ., 2016, doi:
10.1007/s11187-016-9728-7.
10. A. Rocha Menocal, “Why corruption matters: understanding causes, effects and how to address them,” UK
Dep. Int. Dev., 2015, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
11. J. Rose, “The Meaning of Corruption: Testing the Coherence and Adequacy of Corruption Definitions,” Public
Integr., 2018, doi: 10.1080/10999922.2017.1397999.
12. B. A. Olken and R. Pande, “Corruption in Developing Countries,” Annu. Rev. Econom., 2012, doi:
10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110917.
13. F. Zanin, E. Comuzzi, and A. Costantini, “Management Control Systems in Complex Settings: Concept and
Approaches,” in Management Control Systems in Complex Settings: Emerging Research and Opportunities,
IGI Global, 2018.
14. R. Lueg and R. Radlach, “Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature
review,” Eur. Manag. J., 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.005.
15. A. Alkhafaji, H. R. Talab, H. H. Flayyih, and N. A. Hussein, “The Impact Of Management Control Systems
(MCS) On Organizations Performance: A Literature REVIEW,” J. Econ. Adm. Sci., 2018, doi:
10.33095/jeas.v24i105.67.
16. M. Tsamenyi, T. Hopper, and S. Uddin, “Changing control and accounting in an African gold mine An
emergence of a new despotic control,” J. Account. Organ. Chang., 2017, doi: 10.1108/JAOC-03-2014-0017.
17. A. Bhimani and K. Langfield-Smith, “Structure, formality and the importance of financial and non-financial
information in strategy development and implementation,” Manag. Account. Res., 2007, doi:10.1016/j.mar.2006.06.005.
18. R. H. Chenhall and K. Langfield-Smith, “Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures,” Eur. Manag. J.,
2007, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.001.
19. F. Jalalabadi, A. L. Milewicz, S. R. Shah, L. H. Hollier, and E. M. Reece, “Activity-Based Costing,” Semin.
Plast. Surg., 2018, doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672208.
20. C. Caserio and S. Trucco, “Enterprise Resource Planning and Business Intelligence Systems for Information
Quality,” Contrib. to Manag. Sci. Springer, Cham, vol. chapter 2, pp. 13–41, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-
77679-8.
21. C. T. Horngren, S. M. Datar, and M. V. Rajan, “No Title,” Issues Account. Educ., 2010, doi:
10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.789.
22. N. Ilias, N. K. Abdulatiff, and N. Mohamed, “Management control system and performance: Accountability
attributes in local authorities,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, 2016.
23. W. Ge, Z. Li, Q. Liu, and S. McVay, “The Effect of Internal Control on Corporate Corruption: Evidence From
China,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9728-7.
24. S. Ibrahim, G. Diibuzie, and M. Abubakari, “The Impact of Internal Control Systems on Financial
Performance: The Case of Health Institutions in Upper West Region of Ghana,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc.
Sci., 2017, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i4/2840.
25. O. Sativa and C. Daskalakis, “Performance Management in Anti-Corruption Authorities Indonesian and
Swedish Cases,” INTEGRITAS, 2018, doi: 10.32697/integritas.v4i2.264.
26. S. Pondeville, V. Swaen, and Y. De Rongé, “Environmental management control systems: The role of
contextual and strategic factors,” Manag. Account. Res., 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.007.
27. S. Manacorda and C. Grasso, Fighting fraud and corruption at the world bank: A critical analysis of the
sanctions system. 2018.
28. M. Sohail and S. Cavill, “Accountability to prevent corruption in construction projects,” J. Constr. Eng.
Manag., 2008, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:9(729.
29. C. Hauser, “Reflecting on the role of universities in the fight against corruption,” RAUSP Manag. J., 2019, doi:
10.1108/RAUSP-09-2018-0080.
30. M. A. A. Aziz, H. A. Rahman, M. M. Alam, and J. Said, “Enhancement of the Accountability of Public Sectors
through Integrity System, Internal Control System, and Leadership Practices: A Review Study,” Procedia Econ.
Financ., 2015, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01096-5.
31. F. Capalbo and R. Palumbo, “The Imperfect Match of Public Accountability of State-Owned Enterprises and
Private-Sector-Type Financial Reporting: The Case of Italy,” Australas. Accounting, Bus. Financ. J., 2013,
doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v7i4.4.
32. G. Grossi, U. Papenfuß, and M.-S. Tremblay, “Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned
enterprises,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., 2015, doi: 10.1108/ijpsm-09-2015-0166.
33. J. E. Klausen and M. Winsvold, “Corporate governance and democratic accountability: Local state-owned
enterprises in Norway,” J. Public Policy, 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0143814X19000229.
34. G. Grossi, U. Papenfuß, and M.-S. Tremblay, “Corporate Governance and Accountability of State-Owned
Enterprises: Relevance for Science and Society and Interdisciplinary Research Perspectives,” Int. J. Public
Sect. Manag., vol. 28, no. 4/5, pp. 274–285, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2015-0166.
35. S. Royo, A. Yetano, and J. García-Lacalle, “Accountability Styles in State-Owned enterprises: The good, the
bad, the ugly ..: The the pretty,” Rev. Contab. Account. Rev., 2019, doi: 10.6018/rcsar.382231.
36. Sarmini, I. Made Swanda, and U. Nadiroh, “The importance of anti-corruption education teaching materials for
the young generation,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012167.
37. K. Komalasari and D. Saripudin, “Integration of anti-corruption education in school's activities,” Am. J. Appl.
Sci., 2015, doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2015.445.451.
38. R. R. Zamaletdinov, N. P. Yudina, E. I. Lavrentyeva, L. I. Savva, and N. B. Pugacheva, “International Review
of Management and Marketing Practical Recommendations on the Improvement of the Effectiveness of Anticorruption Policy in Universities,” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. |, 2016.
39. Sharma, Vineet, Komal Bansal, K.R.C Reddy, Dev Nath Singh Gautam, Narendra Kumar Singh, Himanshu
Rai, and 2019. Comparative evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Manahshila (Realgar). Journal of
Complementary Medicine Research, 10 (1), 1-12. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20181028100040
40. Alizadeh, A., Kiavar, M., Assadian-Rad, M., Morady, B., Alasti, M., Sadeghi, A., Emkanjoo, Z.Evaluation of
the patients with syncope during the first month after coronary artery bypass graft (2011) Journal of
Cardiovascular Disease Research, 2(3), pp. 186-189. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.85267
41. Pandey Vimal, R.L. Subjective experience aspect of consciousness part I: Integration of classical, quantum,
and subquantum concepts (2009) NeuroQuantology, 7 (3), pp. 390-410.
42. Conte, E.On the logical origins of quantum mechanics demonstrated by using Clifford algebra (2011)
NeuroQuantology, 9(2), pp. 231-242.
43. Slimani, T.RST Approach for Efficient CARs ining (2014) Bonfring International Journal of Data Mining, 4
(4), pp. 34-40.
44. Girish, S., Santhosh, B.S.Determination of Bingham parameters of fresh Portland cement concrete using
concrete shear box (2012) Bonfring Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Sci., 2 (4), pp. 84-90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
