Learning Style and Preferences of Students in Skills-Based Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/0aw16207Keywords:
CAPSOL, Learning Style, Learning Preference, Technology-based CoursesAbstract
When teachers teach students with consideration of their preferred learning styles and recognize their unique qualities, then teachers are making a commitment to providing tools and opportunities needed for students to achieve success. The study was conducted to determine the preferred learning style of students enrolled in the skills-based courses of a state university in Cagayan Valley, Philippines. Differences in the preferred learning style across sex, courses, curriculum year, and GWA of the 480 students enrolled in four (4) undergraduate technology-based courses were described through the use of Computerized Assessment Program- Styles of Learning (CAPSOL). Results showed the learning style preferred include individual, written expression, sequential, and bodily-kinesthetic. When grouped according to sex, course, curriculum year and GWA, females are bodilykinesthetic and individual learners, while, males show preference to visual-auditory and group learning. Among the four courses, students taking Accounting Technology are visual learners while those from the other courses were bodily-kinesthetic. Students in their sophomore year show preference to being sequential learners. In terms of GWA, those with lower tend to learn new materials with a group and those with higher prefer to study alone. Since differences in preferred learning styles were found, there is a need to expose students to varied learning tasks where they are best engaged and offer instructional materials responsive to their needs and learning styles.
Downloads
References
[1] Perna, Jennifer, "Learning Styles and Their Effect on Student Learning" (2011). Senior Honors Theses.
270. http://commons.emich.edu/honors/270
[2] “Choosing the type of Probability Sampling”, Chapter 5, retrieved from https://www.sagepub.com/
sites/default/files/upm-binaries/40803_5.pdf (on-line) Retrieved on October 23, 2019
[3] CAPSOL® Styles of Learning. (n.d.). CAP-SOL Styles of Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.stylesoflearning.com/styles.html
[4] Roberta Ross. “CAPSOL Style of Learning Assessment” retrieved from https://docplayer.net/30616530-
Capsol-style-of-learning-assessment.html (on-line) Retrieved on July 28, 2017
[5] Felder, R. and Silverman, L. (1998), “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering
Education, Vol. 78 No. 7, 674-681. Retrieved from https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads,
Retrieved October 19, 2019.
[6] “Learning Modalities: Understanding the learning styles of all students. Retrieved from
[7] Wilson, Mary Lynne (2011). Students’ learning style preferences and teachers’ instructional strategies:
correlations between matched styles and academic achievement, Dissertation, retrieved
http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi
[8] Abdallah, Ayat R. et al. (2013). Preferred learning styles among prospective research methodology course
students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 2013,
88:3–7. DOI: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000427506. 57924.c1. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
[9] Barbe, WB. and M.N. Milone, “What We Know About Modality Strengths,” Educational Leadership, Feb.
1981, pp. 378-380. Cited in “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering
Education Vol. 78 No. 7, 674-681.
[10] The University of Newcastle. Study Skills Guide. Available at: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/
students/wellbeing/assets/documents/StudySkillsGuide.pdf. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
[11] Zajacová, Blanka (2016). Research of Learning Styles—Getting to Know Students’ Individualities.
Anthropologist, 24(1): 35-42 (2016). Retrieved October 19, 2019.
[12] Gantasala, P.V. and Gantasala, S.B. (2009). Influence of Learning Styles. International Journal of Learning.
January 2009 DOI: 10.18848/1447-9494. Retrieved from www.researchgate.com. Retrieved October 19,
2019.
[13] Awla, H.A. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language
and Linguistics 2014; 2(3): 241-245 Published online June 20, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.
com/j/ijll) doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23. Retrieved from www.researchgate.com on October 19, 2019.
[14] Tuan, L.T. (2011). Matching and Stretching Learners’ Learning Styles. Journal of Language Teaching and
Research, 2(2), 285-294. Retrieved from www.researchgate.com on October 19, 2019.
[15] Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Shagholi, R., Abuzaid, R.A. (2010). Did you cook your lesson based on the right
recipe? (Accommodating the Students Preferences in Class) Social Behavioral Sciences, 2, 383-387.
Retrieved (online) October 19, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.