The Effect of Organizational Culture on Organizational Performance in Government Functional Audit Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/h6pefm34Keywords:
Organizational Culture, Organizational Performance, Audit InstitutionsAbstract
Organizational management is needed based on trust, especially in public sector organizations in Indonesia, especially professionals (auditors) who need professional skills. This study aims to analyze the influence of organizational culture on organizational performance in the audit function of government institutions. This research uses primary data (March-August, 2017 survey). The population is the representative of the Auditor's Functional Auditing Agency (BPK, BPKP, and Inspectorate) in South Sulawesi. A sample of 160 respondents was selected using a purposive random sampling method with a certain quota. Data were analyzed using SEM (Structural Equation Model) analysis. From the study of the results, it shows that organizational culture (X) for the Organizational Performance variable (Z) was 0.335. The path coefficient score of 0.335 shows the direct influence of organizational culture on organizational performance is 33.5%. A positive sign on the path coefficient of direct impact between organizational culture (X) on organizational performance (Z) shows that the better the organizational culture, the higher the organizational performance of functional audit institutions. It can conclude that organizational culture has a positive and significant influence on the performance of technical organizations of government audit institutions.
Downloads
References
1. Aucoin, P. 1990, Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Priciples, Paradoxes and
Pendulums, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol 3. No 2.
2. Axelrod Ruth H,. (2004) “Deciding to Trust a Stranger: An Exploratory Study Of How People Make
Decision Based on Generial Interpersonal Trust With Implication fo Organizatinals Setting” The George
Washington University, USA
3. Barney, J.B. & Hansen , M.H,. (1981) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage, Strategi
Manajement Journal V. 15, 175-190.
4. Birnberg. G. Jacob, Some reflection on the Evolution of Organizational Control, Behavioral Research
Accounting, Vol. 10. Supplement, 1998.
5. Boston, J. (2000) The Challenge of Evaluating Systematic Change: The Case of Public Management
Reform, a paper presented at IPMN conference "Learning from Experiences With New Public Management"
Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney, 4-6 March, 2000.
6. Boyle, R. (1998b) Developing an Integrated Performance Measurement Framework for the Irish Civil
Service, Discussion Paper 3, Public Management Research, Department of Finance, Dublin, pp. 1-33.
7. Condrey, S.E., 1995, Reforming Resource management systems: Eploring the Importance Organizational
Trust, “American review of Public Administration, 25.
8. Daley, D.M. 1991, “Management Practices and theUnivolved Manager: the Effect of Supervisory Attitudes
on Perceptions of Organizational Trust and Change Orientation, “Public Personel Management”, 20.
9. Guthrie, J. (1997) Global Waming: International Experiences with "New" Public Financial Management
(NPFM) Reforms, A presentation for the National Conference, IPAA, 19 November 1997.
10. Hair,et.al(1988), Multivariate Data Analyisis, Printice Hall International-Inc.
11. Kettl, D.F 2000, The Global Public Management Revolution: A. Report on the Transformation on
Governance, Brookings Institution Pres Washinton D,C pp 1- 2
12. Liou K.T & Nyhan,R. (1994) , “Dimension“ or Organization Commitment in Public Organization : An
Emperical Assessment, “ Public Administration Quarlley, 18 , 99-118.
13. Moore, Michael L. Issue Analisis Develipment, and Management Syistem: Parallel Stucture for Public-Sector
OD, “ Public Adminstration Quarterly” , p 232-254, 1989
14. Nyhan, R.C & Marlowe, H.A. (1995), “Performance Management and TQM in the public sector: Opportunity
and Challengers, “ Public Productivity and Management Reviw, 18(4).
15. O”Neill, D. and Hughes, O 1998, Is there a new model of public sector reform? Working paper 57/98, Monas
University, Melbourne
16. Osborne, D and Plastrik, P. 1997, Banishing Bureaucracy – The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government,
A Plume Book
17. Pastin, 1986. The Hard Problem Of Management. Jossey Bass Inc., California, USA.Robbins, Stephern P.,
1998. Organization Behavior, Concepts, Controversies, Application. Seventh Edition, Englewood Cliffs dan
PT. Prenhallindo, Jakarta.
18. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2000, Public Management Reform: Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press online summmery
19. Robbins, Stephern P., 1998. Organization Behavior, Concepts, Controversies, Application. Seventh Edition, Englewood Cliffs dan PT. Prenhallindo, Jakarta.
20. Stajkovic D, Alexander and Fred Luthans, 1997. Effect of Organizational on Work Performance. Journal of Mangement, Vol 3, Page 45 – 53.
21. Zand, D. F. „ Trust and Management Problem Solving. “Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1972); hak. 229-239.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
