The Spread of Hoaxes and Its Legal Consequences

Authors

  • Muhammad Hatta Department of Law, Faculty of Law, UniversitasMalikussaleh, Aceh Utara, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/py88mf62

Keywords:

Distribute Information, Spread, Hoaxes, Legal Consequences

Abstract

The presence of the internet may produce and distribute information easily and quickly. However, the existence of the internet not only has a positive impact, but the internet has also become a medium for committing crimes in the virtual world. A person can easily create and spread hoaxes by creating websites, sites, blogs, accounts, and applications with the aim of creating panic, noise, confusion, or causing distrust for someone, a group, or a government. To charge the perpetrators of spreading hoaxes in virtual space, the government has issued several laws, but the laws that are most often used to charge the perpetrators of spreading hoaxes are Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and Law No. 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Race and Ethnic Discrimination. This law is expected to be able to restrain and give a deterrent effect to those who spread hoaxes to defame someone’s honor and reputation by using tribal, ethnic, racial, and religious sentiments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic

Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.

2. APJII. (2018). Pembentukan BSSN: APJII Siap Berkoordinasi Maksimal. Jakarta: APJII.

3. Bernardino, R. (2017). Cyber Crime. Kupang.

4. Brewer-Carías, A. R. (2010). Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators in Comparative Law. In International

Congress of Comparative Law of the International Academy of Comparative Law (pp. 1–22). Washington, D.C.:

The George Washington University Law School.

5. Collins, H. (2008). The Meaning of Hoaxes. In M. Mazzotti (Ed.), Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the

Sociology of Barry Barnes (4th ed., pp. 1–7). London: Ashgate.

6. Duanto. (2017). Mahfud MD Paparkan Pasal yang Dapat Jerat Ratna Sarumpaet, Bisa Kena 10 Tahun. Retrieved

November 20, 2018, from http://jambi.tribunnews.com/2018/10/06/mahfud-md-paparkan-pasal-yang-dapat-.

7. Erdianto, K. (2017a). Mahfud MD: Yang Kurang Paham, Menuduh MK Perbolehkan Zina dan LGBT. Retrieved

from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/12/17/16235281/mahfud-md-yang-kurang-paham-menuduh-mkperbolehkan-zina-dan-lgbt

8. Erdianto, K. (2017b). Penjelasan MK soal Tuduhan Putusan yang Melegalkan Zina dan LGBT. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/12/18/20155601/penjelasan-mk-soal-tuduhanputusan-yang-melegalkan-zina-dan-lgbt

9. Fatonah, T. (2017). Terbongkar! Pelaku Penyebar Chat Palsu “Kapolri-Kabid Humas Polda Metro Jaya”

Singgung Habib Rizieq. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from http://wow.tribunnews.com/2017/05/28/terbongkarpelaku-penyebar-chat-palsu-kapolri-kabid-humas-polda-metro-jaya-singgung-habib-rizieq

10. Finklea, K. M. (2012). the Interplay of Borders, Turf, Cyberspace, and Jurisdiction: Issues Confronting U.S. Law

Enforcement. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law & Law Enforcement, 5(1/2), 13–20.

11. Hayes, C. T. C. & R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atlantic Journal of

Communication, 23(1), 46–65.

12. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. (W. Lovitt, Ed.). London:

Garland Publishing.

13. Hutchinson, T. C. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law

Review, 17, 83–119.

14. Juditha, C. (2018). Symbolic Interactionism In Anti Hoax Virtual Community To Reduce The Spread of Hoax.

Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan, 19(1), 17–32.

15. Juliswara, V. (2017). Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Volume 4 No. 2 , Agustus 2017. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi V,

4(2), 142–164.

16. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world , unite ! The challenges and opportunities of Social

Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

17. Karina, D., & Mendoza, O. (2017). The Vulnerability of Cyberspace - The Cyber Crime. Journal of Forensic

Sciences & Criminal Investigation, 2(1), 1–8.

18. Kent, M. L. (2016). Social Media Circa 2035 : Directions in Social Media Theory. Atlantic Journal of

Communication, 23(February 2015), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972407

19. Kholid, I. (2017). Bareskrim Limpahkan Berkas Kasus Isu Hoax Rush Money ke Kejaksaan. Retrieved

November 1, 2018, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3405302/bareskrim-limpahkan-berkas-kasus-isu-hoaxrush-money-ke-kejaksaan

20. Kumar, S. (2018). False Information on Web and Social Media : A Survey. Computer Science Law Review, 1(1).

21. Kumar, S., & West, R. (2016). Disinformation on the Web : Impact , Characteristics , and Detection of

Wikipedia Hoaxes. In M. Zanini (Ed.), The International World Wide Web Conference Com- mittee (IW3C2)

(pp. 2–12). Canada: The International World Wide Web Conference Com- mittee (IW3C2).

22. Kurniawan, D. (2018). Persentase Hoax Terbanyak Hadir dari Media Sosial. Retrieved October 29, 2018, from

https://www.gatra.com/rubrik/nasional/pemerintahan-pusat/307668-persentase-hoax-terbanyak-hadir-dari-mediasosial

23. Kuwado, F. J. (2017). Dokter Penyebar Hoaks Istri Panglima TNI Diancam 6 Tahun Penjara. Retrieved

November 7, 2018, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/12/18/11293391/dokter-penyebar-hoaks-istripanglima-tni-diancam-6-tahun-penjara

24. Mastel. (2017). Hasil Survey MASTEL Tentang Wabah Hoax Nasional. Retrieved October 30, 2018, from

http://mastel.id/infografis-hasilsurvey-mastel-tentang-wabah-hoaksnasional/

25. Movanita, A. N. K. (2018). BIN_ 60 Persen Konten Media Sosial adalah Informasi Hoaks - Kompas. Retrieved

October 29, 2018, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/15/06475551/bin-60-persen-konten-mediasosial-adalah-informasi-hoaks

26. Nwizege, K. S., Chukwunonso, F., Kpabeb, C., & Mmeah, S. (2011). The impact of ICT on computer

applications. Proceedings - UKSim 5th European Modelling Symposium on Computer Modelling and

Simulation, EMS 2011, 2(May 2014), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2011.45

27. Pellegrini, L. A. (2008). An Argument For Criminal Hoaks. University of Southern California.

28. Puspita, S. (2018). Sejumlah Temuan Polisi soal Hoaks Pengeroyokan Ratna Sarumpaet. Retrieved November 2,

2018, from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2018/10/04/07470651/sejumlah-temuan-polisi-soal-hoakspengeroyokan-ratna-sarumpaet

29. Rahadi, D. R. (2012). Perilaku pengguna dan informasi. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70.

30. Siddiqui, S. (2016). Social Media its Impact with Positive and Negative Aspects. International Journal of

Computer Applications Technology and Research, 5(2), 71–75.

31. Smith, E. (2010). Constitutional Courts As “Positive Legislators.” In International Congress of Comparative

Law (pp. 1–7). Washington, D.C.: International Academy of Comarative Law.

32. Soesilo, R. (1991). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap

Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.

33. Tongia, R., Subrahmanian, E., & Arunachalam, V. S. (2005). Information and Communications Technology (ICT ). Information and Communications Technology for Sustainable Development Defining a Global Research

Agenda.

34. United National Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime. In Conference

Support Section Organized Crime Branch Division for Treaty Affairs (pp. 1–30). Retrieved from

http://www.unodc.org/documents/organizedcrime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/CYBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf

35. Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information,

Opinion Expression, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375

36. Whittaker, E., Kowalski, R. M., Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015). Cyberbullying Via Social Media.

Journal of School Violence, 14(01), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.949377

37. Widayati, L. S. (2018). Ujaran Kebencian: Batasan Pengertian dan Larangannya. Pusat Penelitian Badan

Keahlian DPR RI, X(6), 1–6. Retrieved from http://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info Singkat-X-6-IIP3DI-Maret-2018-186.pdf

38. Widodo. (2013). Memerangi Cybercrime : karakteristik, motivasi, dan strategi penanganannya dalam perspektif

kriminologi. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

39. Yaqin, A. (2007). Legal Research and Writting. Malayan Law Journal SDN BHD, 1, 10.

40. Yuliani, A. (2017). Ada 800.000 Situs Penyebar Hoax di Indonesia. Retrieved October 29, 2018, from

https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/12008/ada-800000-situs-penyebar-hoax-di-indonesia/0/sorotan_media

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Hatta, M. (2020). The Spread of Hoaxes and Its Legal Consequences. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 1750-1760. https://doi.org/10.61841/py88mf62