COMPARISON OF HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR INTRUDER DETECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/63yfh645Keywords:
IDS, SVM, KNN, NSL-KDDAbstract
In the modern world, network information security has become an important concern of the Internet and volume data. Web security services 'intrusion detection system (IDS) is a critical component that uses network traffic statistics to identify attacks. IDS should be able to implement data exploration and information mining systems to classify network machine outbreaks. The computation costs of IDS, however, are also necessary to help with the actual detection in line for the dismissal and inappropriate features in the Internet stream of traffic dataset. We in this manner break down six artificial intelligence algorithms for IDS. Everywhere we independently execute information preprocessing with two sorts of dimensionality decrease procedures like principal component analysis and singular value decomposition to detect the attacks in the NSL-KDD dataset. The investigation results on the NSL-KDD dataset check that the course of action estimations with dimensionality dropout stands in discovery rate and speed. From our experimental result, Principle Component Analysis with classifier KNN gives its matchless quality compared with the Singular Value Decomposition technique.
Downloads
References
1. Meng W., Tischhauser E. W., Wang Q., Wang Y., Han J.: When intrusion detection meets blockchain technology: A Review. IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 10179–10188 (2018).
2. Kumar K., Singh J.: Network intrusion detection with feature selection techniques using machine-learning algorithms. International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 150, pp. 1–13 (2016).
3. Ambusaidi M. A., He X., Nanda P., Tan Z.: Building an intrusion detection system using a filter-based feature selection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 65, pp. 2986–2998 (2016).
4. Aburomman A. A., Reaz M.B.I.: A survey of intrusion detection systems based on ensemble and hybrid classifiers. Computers & Security, vol. 65, pp. 135–152, (2017).
5. Ashfaq R. A. R., Wang X. Z., Huang J. Z.: Fuzziness-based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system. Information Sciences, vol. 378, pp. 484–497 (2017).
6. Elejla O. E., Belaton B., Anbar M., Alnajjar A.: Intrusion detection systems of ICMPv6-based DDoS attacks. Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 30, pp. 45–56 (2016).
7. M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. Ghorbani, “A Detailed Analysis of the KDD CUP 99 Data Set,” Submitted to Second IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications (CISDA), 2009.
8. Ikram S. T.: Improving accuracy of intrusion detection model using PCA and optimized SVM. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, vol. 24, pp. 133–148 (2016).
9. Subba B., Biswas S., Karmakar S.: Intrusion detection in mobile ad hoc networks: Bayesian game formulation. Engineering Science & Technology, an International Journal, vol. 19, pp. 782–799 (2016).
10. Abielmona R.: 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications (IEEE CISDA 2012) [Conference Report]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 8, pp. 12–13 (2013).
11. Shuai Jiang and Xiaolong Xu, Application and Performance Analysis of Data Preprocessing for Intrusion Detection System, vol. 20 pp. 163–177 (2019).
12. Chandrashekhar A. M., Raghuveer K.: Performance evaluation of data clustering techniques using KDD Cup-99 intrusion detection data set. International Journal of Information and Network Security (IJINS), vol. 1, (2012).
13. Rampure V., Tiwari A.: A rough set-based feature selection on the KDD CUP 99 data set. International Journal of Database Theory and Application, vol. 8, pp. 149–156 (2015).
14. Piuri V. 2009 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI 2009) [Conference Reports. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 4, pp. 20–21, (2009).
15. Ng K. Y. K., Lam M. N., The Canadian Forces’ information and intelligence fusion center: A preliminary capacity planning study. Defense & Security Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 69–79 (2009).
16. Feng LiuJia XuShouhuai XuMoti Yung Science of Cyber Security, Second International Conference, SciSec 2019 Nanjing, China, August 9–11, (2019).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
