INDIA'S TRIBAL LAW: WHY AUTONOMOUS TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS ARE BETTER AND HOW DECENTRALIZED ADMINISTRATION IS EXTINGUISHING TRIBAL RIGHTS

India's populace incorporates around 100,000,000 ancestral individuals. The country's north eastern states, which line China and Burma, and the great nations and fields of peninsular India, are the two main districts of tribal settlement. The last point is the focus of this paper. This territory is home to the majority of India's tribal peoples, who were just as of late acquainted with self-government when the Indian Parliament passed the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996. (PESA). PESA requested states in peninsular India to deny certain political, definitive, and monetary powers to neigh boring organizations picked by ancestral networks in their authoritative reach. The Act was adulated as one of the most unique regulation passed since autonomy, conceding ancestral gatherings' extreme components the power to safeguard their traditions and entrusting them with the master to deal with their gathering's resources. Notwithstanding, following decade, obviously PESA has neglected to meet those goals. Clans have been forced to establish their character and rights as a result of blatant invasion of tribal interests and the state administrations' hesitancy (at times, sheer dawdling) in surrendering experts. Tribal strife has wreaked havoc in these districts, and maverick groups such as the Nasals have developed into a serious threat to India's national securit