RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MAXILLARY 1st PREMOLAR DEVELOPMENT BASED ON NOLLAS STAGE OF TOOTH DEVELOPMENT IN 7- 9 YEAR OLD MALE CHILDREN - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cyby7n61Keywords:
Calcification, Development, Maxillary premolar, Maturation, Nollas stageAbstract
The aim of the study is to radiographically evaluate the maxillary first premolar development based on nollas stage of tooth development in 7 to 9 year old male children. A total of about 400 orthopantomography (OPG) images were collected from the database record of the dental institution between June 2019-March 2020. Of these 200 OPGs were selected based on the age group between 7-9 years old male children. Dental age of developing permanent first maxillary premolar was calculated based on the nollas method after data collection statistical analysis was done in SPSS software. Among the study population 68% were 7 years old, 13% were 8 years old and 19% were 9 years old. Considering the distribution of teeth assessed 52.5% were 14 and 47.5% were 24. Majority of the teeth attained maximum development at stage 4(45%), and the least assessed at stage 1(1%). The association between the age and nollas stage of tooth development showed p-value of 0.082(p>0.05) the difference is statistically not significant. And the association between the tooth number and nollas stage of tooth development showed p value-0.054,p(>0.05), which is statistically not significant. Within the limitations of the study it was concluded that, majority of the maxillary first premolar teeth assessed among 7 to 9 years old male children had premolar ‘crown almost completed’ (Stage 4) according to Nollas stage of tooth development. Majority of the children in the age group of 7 and 9 years had 2/3rd crown completed in premolar(Stage 4) and majority of 8 years old children had ‘crown almost completed’ in premolar (Stage 5)
Downloads
References
1. Kamal AT, Shaikh A, Fida M. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the calcification stages of
permanent mandibular teeth. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Aug 1;23(4):44.e1–44.e8.
2. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian
children. Forensic Sci Int. 1998 Jun 8;94(1-2):73–85.
3. Sachan K, Sharma VP, Tandon P. Reliability of Nolla’s dental age assessment method for Lucknow
population. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Jan 1;1(1):8.
4. Ravikumar D, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Evaluation of knowledge among general dentists in
treatment of traumatic injuries in primary teeth: A cross-sectional questionnaire study. Eur J Dent. 2017
Apr;11(2):232–7.
5. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary
malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018
Jan;12(1):67–70.
6. Christabel SL, Gurunathan D. Prevalence of type of frenal attachment and morphology of frenum in
children, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. World J Dent. 2015;6(4):203–7.
7. Govindaraju L, Gurunathan D. Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective
Clinical Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31–4.
8. Packiri S, Gurunathan D, Selvarasu K. Management of Paediatric Oral Ranula: A Systematic Review. J
Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZE06.
9. Gurunathan D, Shanmugaavel AK. Dental neglect among children in Chennai. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev
Dent. 2016 Oct;34(4):364–9.
10. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and
Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary
Teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC55–8.
11. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in
primary teeth among indian dentists: A questionnaire survey. Journal of International Oral Health. 2017
Mar 1;9(2):45.
12. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and
instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded
randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(03):376–9.
13. Nair M, Jeevanandan G, Vignesh R, Subramanian EMG. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain
after pulpectomy with k-files, kedo-s files and mtwo files in deciduous molars-a randomized clinical
trial. Brazilian Dental Science. 2018;21(4):411–7.
14. JeevananDan GS. Kedo-S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth–Case report. J
Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. 2017,11(3); Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427458/
15. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual
instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273–8.
16. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG, Others. Comparison of instrumentation time and
obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary
teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):75.
17. Somasundaram S, Ravi K, Rajapandian K, Gurunathan D. Fluoride Content of Bottled Drinking Water in
Chennai, Tamilnadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC32–4
18. Fluoride, Fluoridated Toothpaste Efficacy And Its Safety In Children - Review. IJPR [Internet]. 2018 Oct
1;10(04). Available from: http://www.ijpronline.com/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ID=7041
19. Falkner F. Deciduous tooth eruption. Arch Dis Child. 1957 Oct;32(165):386–91.
20. Nolla CM, Others. The development of permanent teeth [Internet]. University of Michigan; 1952.
Available from: https://www.dentalage.co.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/nolla_cm_1960_development_perm_teeth.pdf
21. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics - E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences;
2014. 768 p.
22. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha , Rajeshkumar S , Lakshmi T ,Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica
fragrans extract . Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019 ;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607
23. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973
May;45(2):211–27.
24. Sardana D, Bhadana S, Indushekar KR, Saraf B, Sheoran N. Comparative assessment of chronological,
dental, and skeletal age in children [Internet]. Vol. 30, Indian Journal of Dental Research . 2019. p. 687.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_698_17
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
