Performance Analysis of Solar Still along with Perforated& Non-Perforated Slabs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/nkqwgw12Keywords:
wooden mica, thermal conductivity, non-metallic components, solar efficiency, drilling, and absorber.Abstract
Analyses are executed to test the effect on the output of a modest solar by perforated & anti-perforated absorber plates. Two basic and comparable panels were constructed with a basin shape of 1.0 m x 0.7 m. The absorbent plates, all of them with low thermal/heat conductivity, are composed of three various non-metallic components, wood-mica, acrylic along with fiberglass. Caused by the insufficiency of a corrosion issue observed at the metal absorber plates, non- metallic absorber plates were selected. First, for every absorber plate without perforations, the execution of solar was still investigated. The wooden absorber board could not be employed for perforations because it could not endure the impacts of water, and it was quickly bent and swelled when water was wetted. The boards were then employed for drillings and the effect was not examined in the solar perforator plates. The wooden absorber plate could not be employed for perforations. The scientific results suggest that solar efficiency still depends heavily on the amount of water. With acrylic absorber flat without any drilling that was 2570 ml / d even lower than solar plates, the maximum productivity of 3160 ml / d was achieved. The usage of absorber plate without drilling increased the overall production by 22%-26%, whereas after drilling, productivity increased by only 6-14%. In the wood mica absorber sheet, subject of swelling along with bending was identified which makes it unbecoming for usage.
Downloads
References
[1] S. Chávez, H. Terres, A. Lizardi, R. López, and A. Lara, “Heat Transfer Intern Coefficient Determination in
the Process of Solar Still,” p. 12032, 2019.
[2] B. Gupta, A. Kumar, and P. V. Baredar, “Experimental investigation on modified solar still using nanoparticles
and water sprinkler attachment,” Front. Mater., vol. 4, Aug. 2017.
[3] H. Manchanda and M. Kumar, “A comprehensive decade review and analysis on designs and performance
parameters of passive solar still,” Renewables Wind. Water, Sol., vol. 2, no. 1, Dec. 2015.
[4] H. Sharon and K. S. Reddy, “A review of solar energy driven desalination technologies,” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 41. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1080–1118, 01-Jan-2015.
[5] T. Elango, A. Kannan, and K. Kalidasa Murugavel, “Performance study on single basin single slope solar still
with different water nanofluids,” Desalination, vol. 360, pp. 45–51, Mar. 2015.
[6] T. Elango and K. Kalidasa Murugavel, “The effect of the water depth on the productivity for single and double
basin double slope glass solar stills,” Desalination, vol. 359, pp. 82–91, Mar. 2015.
[7] A. A. El-Sebaii and E. El-Bialy, “Advanced designs of solar desalination systems: A review,” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1198–1212, 01-Oct-2015.
[8] A. E. Kabeel, Z. M. Omara, and M. M. Younes, “Techniques used to improve the performance of the stepped
solar still-A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 46. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 178–188, 2015.
[9] P. Vishwanath Kumar, A. Kumar, O. Prakash, and A. K. Kaviti, “Solar stills system design: A review,”
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 51. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 153–181, 22-Jun-2015.
[10] A. Somwanshi and A. K. Tiwari, “Performance enhancement of a single basin solar still with flow of water
from an air cooler on the cover,” Desalination, vol. 352, pp. 92–102, Nov. 2014.
[11] Z. M. Omara, A. E. Kabeel, and M. M. Younes, “Enhancing the stepped solar still performance using internal
reflectors,” Desalination, vol. 314, pp. 67–72, Apr. 2013.
[12] Z. M. Omara, A. E. Kabeel, and M. M. Younes, “Enhancing the stepped solar still performance using internal
and external reflectors,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 78, pp. 876–881, Feb. 2014.
[13] Z. Sari Hassoun, K. Aliane, and H. I. Berrezoug, “Experimental study of a solar still,” in AIP Conference
Proceedings, 2016, vol. 1758.
[14] K. V. K. Reddy, N. S. Somanchi, H. B. Banoth, and R. Gugulothu, “Experimental study of solar still with
energy storage materials,” in ASME 2014 12th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and
Analysis, ESDA 2014, 2014, vol. 2.
[15] T. Arunkumar, K. Vinothkumar, A. Ahsan, R. Jayaprakash, and S. Kumar, “Experimental Study on Various
Solar Still Designs,” ISRN Renew. Energy, vol. 2012, pp. 1–10, 2012.
[16] T. Arunkumar, R. Jayaprakash, A. Ahsan, and S. Technology, “A comparative experimental testing in
enhancement of the efficiency of pyramid solar still and hemispherical solar still,” Int. J. Renew. Energy,
vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2012.
[17] S. W. Sharshir, G. Peng, L. Wu, F. A. Essa, A. E. Kabeel, and N. Yang, “The effects of flake graphite
nanoparticles, phase change material, and film cooling on the solar still performance,” Appl. Energy, vol.
191, pp. 358–366, 2017.
[18] A. Muthu Manokar et al., “Integrated PV/T solar still- A mini-review,” Desalination, vol. 435. Elsevier B.V.,
pp. 259–267, 01-Jun-2018.
[19] A. E. Kabeel, Z. M. Omara, F. A. Essa, and A. S. Abdullah, “Solar still with condenser – A detailed review,”
2016.
[20] T. Rajaseenivasan and K. Srithar, “Performance investigation on solar still with circular and square fins in
basin with CO2 mitigation and economic analysis,” Desalination, vol. 380, pp. 66–74, Feb. 2016.
[21] R. Sathyamurthy, S. A. El-Agouz, and V. Dharmaraj, “Experimental analysis of a portable solar still with
evaporation and condensation chambers,” Desalination, vol. 367, pp. 180–185, Jul. 2015.
[22] T. Yan, G. Xie, L. Sun, M. Du, and H. Liu, “Experimental investigation on a two-effect tubular solar still
operating under vacuum conditions,” Desalination, Oct. 2019.
[23] A. Ahsan and T. Fukuhara, “Mass and heat transfer model of Tubular Solar Still,” Sol. Energy, vol. 84, no. 7,
pp. 1147–1156, Jul. 2010
[24] P. U. Suneesh, R. Jayaprakash, T. Arunkumar, and D. Denkenberger, “Effect of air flow on ‘V’ type solar still
with cotton gauze cooling,” Desalination, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Mar. 2014.
[25] T. Arunkumar, D. Denkenberger, A. Ahsan, and R. Jayaprakash, “The augmentation of distillate yield by using
concentrator coupled solar still with phase change material,” Desalination, vol. 314, pp. 189–192, 2013.
[26] A. E. Kabeel, T. Arunkumar, D. C. Denkenberger, and R. Sathyamurthy, “Performance enhancement of solar
still through efficient heat exchange mechanism – A review,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 114.
Elsevier Ltd, pp. 815–836, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
