DETECTING DIGITAL IMAGE COPYMOVE FORGERY WITH IMAGE FORENSICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cm6fv156Abstract
Over the last several years, the growth of photo editing software has resulted in the emergence of a subject of active research in the field of digital image fraud detection. Copy Move Forgery Detection (CMFD), also known as passive forgery detection, is the subject of this study. It is used to photographs that have been manipulated via the use of the copy move technique. Oriented Features from Accelerated Segment Test and rotated Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (Oriented FAST and rotated BRIEF) are proposed as the feature extraction method for a CMFD technique that uses 2 Nearest Neighbor (2NN) with Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) as the feature matching method. This technique is proposed as a CMFD technique. The proposed CMFD approach was evaluated using images that were exposed to a variety of geometrical assaults at various points in time. Using the proposed method for assessments, which makes use of photographs from the MICC-F600 and MICC-F2000 databases, it is possible to attain an overall accuracy rate of 84.33% and 82.79% respectively. The True Positive Rate for forgery detection was more than 91% when applied to photographs that had been altered in a variety of ways, including using different degrees of rotation, magnification, and object translation.
Downloads
References
1] N. Krawetz, “A pictures worth digital image analysis and forensics,” Black Hat Briefings, 2007
[2] S. Lian and Y. Zhang, “Multimedia forensics for detecting forgeries,” in Handbook of Information and
Communication Security, pp. 809–828, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[3] Y. Li, “Image copy-move forgery detection based on polar cosine transform and approximate nearest
neighbor searching,” Forensic Science International, vol. 224, no. 1–3, pp. 59–67, 2013.
[4] H. Farid, “Digital doctoring: how to tell the real from the fake,” Significance, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 162–166,
2006.
[5] B. B. Zhu, M. D. Swanson, and A. H. Tewf ik, “When seeing isn’t believing [multimedia authentication
technologies],” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 40–49, 2004.
[6] H. Farid, “Image forgery detection: a survey,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 16–25,
2009.
[7] I. Cox, M. Miller, J. Bloom, J. Fridrich, and T. Kalker, Digital Watermarking and Steganography, Morgan
Kaufmann, Burling-ton, Mass, USA, 2007.
[8] M. A. Qureshi and M. Deriche, “A bibliography of pixel-based blind image forgery detection techniques,”
Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 39, pp. 46–74, 2015.
[9] T. Qazi, K. Hayat, S. U. Khan et al., “Survey on blind image forgery detection,” IET Image Processing,
vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 660– 670, 2013.
[10] T. Mahmood, T. Nawaz, R. Ashraf et al., “A survey on block based copy move image forgery detection
techniques,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Tech-nologies (ICET ’15), pp. 1–6, Peshawar, Pakistan,
December 2015.
[11] J. Fridrich, D. Soukal, and J. Luka´ˇs, “Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images,” in Proceedings
of Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, August 2003.
[12] S. Bayram, H. T. Sencar, and N. Memon, “An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move
forgery,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
(ICASSP ’09), pp. 1053–1056, April 2009.
[13] A. C. Popescu and H. Farid, “Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions,” Tech. Rep.
TR2004-515, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA, 2004.
[14] Y. Huang, W. Lu, W. Sun, and D. Long, “Improved DCT-based detection of copy-move forgery in
images,” Forensic Science International, vol. 206, no. 1–3, pp. 178–184, 2011.
[15] G. Li, Q. Wu, D. Tu, and S. Sun, “A sorted neighborhood approach for detecting duplicated regions in
image forgeries based on DWT and SVD,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and
Expo (ICME ’07), pp. 1750–1753, IEEE, Beijing, China, 2007.
[16] B. Mahdian and S. Saic, “Detection of copy-move forgery using a method based on blur moment
invariants,” Forensic Science International, vol. 171, no. 2-3, pp. 180–189, 2007.
[17] J. Zhao and J. Guo, “Passive forensics for copy-move image forgery using a method based on DCT and
SVD,” Forensic Science International, vol. 233, no. 1–3, pp. 158–166, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
