The Relationship between Religious Symbols and Intergroup Attitudes among Majority Group Members
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bd5jt414Keywords:
out-group attitudes, prejudice, religious, Israel, threat, minority/majorityAbstract
Precursors of intergroup tension have been researched in divided societies in an aim to understand social problems. It seems that negative attitudes towards the out-group stem from a combination of two contrasting processes, in-group preference and out-group derogation. As research has progressed, a growing interest has been shown in understanding the emergence of negative out-group attitudes while focusing on variables such as intergroup threat, contact between groups, social norms and religion. This study investigated whether priming of religious concepts influences prejudices and threat perceptions of Jewish majority members towards Arab minority members in Israel. We attempted to find priming effects of religious content on prejudice and perceived threat with religiosity as a moderating variable. Religious words were primed via search puzzles, and were then followed by questionnaire filling. Priming effects were not found for prejudice or threat perceptions, probably due to social desirability effects. Although this is a preliminary investigation, this paper highlights the importance of studying the contribution of religious content to intergroup attitude formation for majority group members toward minority members.
Downloads
References
[1] Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., and Trotschel, R. (2001). "The automated
will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals," Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, vol. 81, pp. 1014-1027.
[2] Bohman, A., and Hjerm, M. (2014). "How the religious context affects the relationship between religiosity
and attitudes towards immigration," Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37(6), pp. 937-957.
[3] Correll, J., Park, B., and Allegra Smith, J. (2008). "Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction
strategies in high-conflict situations," Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 11(4), pp. 471-491.
[4] Deaux, K., and Verkuyten, M. (2014). The social psychology of multiculturalism: Identity and intergroup
relations. In V. Benet-Martinez & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multicultural identity: Basic
and applied psychological perspectives (pp. 118-138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[5] De Dreu, C. K., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Leyens, J. P. (1995). "Dilution of stereotype-based cooperation in
mixed-motive interdependence," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 575-593.
[6] Guimond, S., de la Sablonnière, R., and Nugier, A. (2014). "Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup
ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations," European Review of Social Psychology, vol.
25(1), pp. 142-188.
[7] Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., and LaBouff, J. P. (2012). "Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group
favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?" Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, vol. 4, pp. 154–168.
[8] Morrison, K. R., Plaut, V. C., and Ybarra, O. (2010). "Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or
negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification," Personality
and social psychology bulletin, vol. 36(12), pp. 1648-1661.
[9] Pérez, D., Salas-Fumas, V., and Saurina, J. (2008). "Earnings and capital management in alternative loan
loss provision regulatory regimes," European Accounting Review, vol. 17(3), pp. 423-445.
[10] Pettigrew, T. F., and Tropp, L. R. (2008). "How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic
tests of three mediators," European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 922-934.
[11] Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). "Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A
priming study," European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 37, pp. 1032-1045.
[12] Ramsay, J. E., Pang, J. S., Shen, M. J., & Rowatt, W. C. (2014). "Rethinking Value Violation: Priming
Religion Increases Prejudice in Singaporean Christians and Buddhists," International Journal for the
Psychology of Religion, vol. 24(1), pp. 1-15.
[13] Razpurker-Apfeld, I., and Shamoa-Nir, L. (2015a). "The influence of exposure to religious symbols on outgroup stereotypes," Psychology, vol. 6(05), pp. 650-663.
[14] Razpurker-Apfeld, I., and Shamoa-Nir, L. (2015b). Are out-group stereotypes influenced by exposure to
religious content? In A. M. Columbus (Ed.) Advances in psychology research (vol. 113, Chapter 6). New
York: Nova Science Publishers.
[15] Razpurker-Apfeld and Shamoa-Nir, L. (2018). "Religious content in intergroup relations: the influence of
exposure to religious symbols on mutual stereotypes of Jews and Muslims," Megamot, vol. 53(2), pp. 217-
248. (in Hebrew)
[16] Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., and Gaertner, S. L. (2006). "Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A metaanalytic review," Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 10, pp. 336-353.
[17] Shamoa-Nir, L. (2014). "Defining resilience from practice: Case study of resilience building in a MultiCultural College," Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 18, pp. 279-286.
[18] Shamoa-Nir, L. (2017). "The Window becomes a mirror: the use of the Johari windows model to evaluate
stereotypes in intergroup dialogue". Israel Affairs, pp. 1-20.
[19] Shamoa-Nir, L. (2019). Investigating Stereotypes Among Minority Group Members in Israel: The Role of
In-group and Out-group Symbols. Proceedings of the XVI European congress of psychology, Moscow,
Russia, pp. 1468-1468.
[20] Shamoa-Nir, L., and Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2013). The Influence of Exposure to Nationality Concepts on
Stereotypes among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Proceedings of the Jerusalem International Conference on
Neural Plasticity and Cognitive Modifiability, Jerusalem, Israel, pp. 123-125.
[21] Shamoa-Nir, L., and Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2019). "Investigating stereotypes towards the out-group: The
role of religious concepts and group membership," Basic and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 41(3), pp.
188-200.
[22] Stephan, W. G. (2014). "Intergroup anxiety theory, research, and practice," Personality and Social
Psychology Review, vol. 18, 239-255.
[23] Stephan, W. G., and Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In D. M. Mackie & E.
R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–
207). New York: Psychology Press.
[24] Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., and Bachman, G. (1999). "Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat
theory analysis," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 2221-2237.
[25] Tur-Kaspa, M., and Schwarzwald, J. (2003). "Perceived threat and prejudice in three domains of intergroup
tension in Israeli Society," (in Hebrew). Megamot, vol. 42, pp. 549-584.
[26] Velasco González, K., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., and Poppe, E. (2008). "Prejudice towards Muslims in the
Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory," British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 667-685.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
