Shatranj ke Khilari – A Semiological Analysis with Roland Barthes Approach

Authors

  • Kumar Anketa PhD student, Department of Indian Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Assistant Professor, National Institure of Fashion Technology, Doorbhash Nagar, Raebareli, UP, India Author
  • Kumar Sunil Director, School of Performing and Visual Arts, Indira Gandhi National Open University, 93, Maidan Garhi Road, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi, Delhi 110068 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/gszxyr73

Keywords:

Image, Costume, Connotation, Visual Communication, Satyajit Ray

Abstract

 This paper focuses on Media study which is an emerging field within visual studies. To understand the phenomenon of semiotics we have adopted Ronald Barthes approach who was born in November 19151(1), according to whom an image is a medium of communication having a signifier and signified. This approach provides a new essence to the selected movie taken as case to explain shots communicating verbally and nonverbally. The paper addresses the novel approach of semiotics allowing media to examine the signs in a given image. This analysis explains that how connotative meanings of visuals are derived even by nonverbal communication. This approach contains fresh semiotics with costume and colors as sign indicators. This paper is an attempt to understand that how semiology can be applied to visuals in media studies. The qualitative study conferring Roland Barthes perspective analyses within the messages or images are purposefully shown to the viewer. The paper will analyze Shatranj ke Khiladi (Chess players), a Hindi film by renowned director Satyajit Ray as case study of a narrative around 1856 in Awadh - a princely state in India. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] The Semiology Analysis In Media Studies - Roland Barthes Approach - Feyrouz Bouzida

[2] The Greenwood Encyclopedia Of Clothing Through ..., Volume 2; Volumes 1501-1800 Edited By Jill Condra

[3] Costumes Of The Rulers Of Mewar: With Patterns And Construction Techniques By Pushpa Rani Mathur

[4] Roland Barthes 1968. Elements Of Semiology.1st Ed. New York: Hill And Wang.4

[5] Ferdinand De Saussure 1915, Course In General Linguistics, 2nd Ed, New York, Hill Book Company.

[6] John Fisk .1990. Introduction To Communication Studies .2nd Ed. New York: Routledge.

[7] Hadumod Busmann 1996. Rourledge Dictionary Of Language And Linguistics 1st Ed. New York. Routledge.

[8] Sibhan Chapman, Christopher Routledge 2009.Key Ideas In Linguistics And Philosophy Of Language.

Edinburg. Edinburg University Press

[9] Harry Jamieson 2007. Visual Communication.1st Ed. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.

[10] Robert E. Innis. Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology 1985, Usa: Indiana University

[11] J.A Cuddon 1998, The Penguin Dictionary Of Literary Terms And Literary Theory, 4th Ed. London: Penguin

Books.

[12] Klaus Bruhn Jensen 2002 , A Handbook Of Media And Communication Research, 1st Ed.London, Routledge.

[13] Joseph Turow 2009 , Media Today , 3rd Ed , Uk , Routledge

[14] Barthes, R. (1967) The Elements Of Semiology, London, Cape.

[15] Barthes, R. (1972) Mythologies, London, Cape.

[16] Barthes, R. (1975) The Pleasure Of The Text, New York, Hall & Wang.

[17] Bryson, N. (1990) Looking At The Overlooked: Four Essays On Still Life Painting, London, Reaktion Books.

[18] Cousins, M. And Hussain, A. (1984) Michel Foucault, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

[19] Derrida, J. (1981) Positions, Chicago, Il, University Of Chicago Press.

[20] Dreyfus, H. And Rabinow, P. (Eds) (1982) Beyond Structuralism And Hermeneutics, Brighton, Harvester.

[21] Hall, S. (1980) ‘Encoding And Decoding’, In Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. And Willis, P. (Eds), Culture,

Media, Language, London, Hutchinson.

[22] BERNSTEIN, B. Class, Code and Control: Volume 1 – Theoretical Studies Towards A Sociology Of

Language (1971)

[23] BOURDIEU, P., PASSERON, J. C. (1990), Reproduction in education, society and culture, London: Sage

[24] CINA,S.-CINOVÁ, E. (2010),The use of Roma language at primary school. Metodicko-pedagogické centrum.

Bratislava

[25] HORVÁTHOVÁ, J. Chapters from Roma History.Praha: Člověk v tísni, společnost pri ČT, o.p.s., 2002. ISBN

80-7106-615-X.

[26] KALEJA, M. a ZEZULKOVÁ, E.School Inclusion versus Exclusion: Selected Contexts of Education for

Socially Excluded Children and Pupils Needing Support Measures.1. vyd. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita,

Pedagogická fakulta, 2016. 114 s. ISBN 978-80-7464-840-3.

[27] KATRŇÁK, T., (2006), „Faktory podmiňujícívzdělanostníaspiracežákůdevátýchtřídzákladníchškol v České

republice“ Pp. 173- 193 in Matejů, P., Straková, J. et al. (Un) Equal Chances of Education: Educational

Inequalities in the Czech Republic. Praha.

[28] LIÉGEOIS, J. P. Roma, Gypsies, Nomads.Bratislava: Informačné a konzultačné stredisko o Rade Európy,

1995. ISBN 80-967380-4-6.

[29] LEMHÖFER, K., SCHRIEFERS, H., &HANIQUEe, I. (2010). Nativelanguageeffects in learningsecondlanguagegrammaticalgender: A training study. Actapsychologica, 150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.001

[30] MIKULAJOVÁ, M. (1995). Heidelberg Speech Development Test (HSET). KL PF UK, Bratislava. 1995.

Child Psychology and Pathopsychology. Roč. 30, č. 3, s. 323-325. ISSN: 0555-5574.

[31] PORTIK, M. Determinants of Education of a Roma Pupil.Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Pedagogická

fakulta, 2003. ISBN 80-8068-155-4.

[32] PAPE, I. How to Work with Roma Pupils - A Handbook for Teachers and Teachers Assistants.Praha: Slovo

21, 2007.

[33] ROSINSKÝ, R. a kol. (2009). Intercultural aspect of pupils' education from different socio-cultural

backgrounds. In: Pedagogical-psychological and intercultural aspects of the work of teachers of pupils from

different socio-cultural backgrounds.Nitra: FSVaZ UKF, 2009 s. 129. ISBN 978-80-8094-589-3

[34] ŘÍČAN, P. (1991) Family psychology - the field of birth. In Czechoslovak Psychology, roč. 35, č. 1, s. 38-47

[35] ŘÍČAN, G., K. (2003), New Identity of Czech Roma - Hope or Threat? In: V. Smékal (Ed.). support for

optimum development of children 's personality from minorities. Social, pedagogical and psychological aspects

of forming the personality of Roma children and children from other minorities.Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

ČR

[36] PLAŇAVA, I. (1994).Components and processes of family and marriage. In Czechoslovak Psychology,roč.

38, s. 1-14

[37] STRAKOVÁ, J., VESELÝ, A., (2010), "Educational inequalities and their solution from the perspective of

actors"Pp. 404- 420 in Matejů, P., Straková, J., Veselý, A. et al. Inequalities in Education: From Measurement

to Solution.Praha: SLON

[38] ŠIKROVÁ, M.Teaching Roma language at schools. In: Roma culture in Slovakia in the 21st century,

príspevky odzneli dňa 23.10.2003 na konferencii v Šamoríne. Dunajská Streda: LILIUM AURUM, 2004. s. 35

– 38. ISBN 80-8062-211-6.

[39] VANKOVÁ, K. (2006)Analysis of socially disadvantaged environment, its elimination and the problem of

Roma identity. In Rosinský R. (ed): Increasing the level of socialization of the Roma ethnicity through

systems of social and missionary education and teacher assistants.Nitra : UKF, 2006. ISBN 80-8050-987-5.

[40] VESELÝ, A., MATEJŮ, P., (2010), "Education Systems and Reproduction of Educational Inequalities" Pp.

38- 90 in Matejů, P., Straková, J., Veselý, A. et al. Inequalities in Education: From Measurement to

Solution.Praha: SLON

[41] WALSH, F.(1982). Normalfamilyprocesses.London: TheGuildford Press N.Y.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Anketa, K., & Sunil , K. (2019). Shatranj ke Khilari – A Semiological Analysis with Roland Barthes Approach. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 2008-2016. https://doi.org/10.61841/gszxyr73