Communication skills of children from Roma families in Slovak language in the first year of primary schools

Authors

  • Katarína Vanková Institute of Romological Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Kraskova no. 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic Author
  • Rastislav Rosinský Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Kraskova no. 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic Author
  • Miroslava Čerešníková Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Kraskova no. 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ewx28c19

Keywords:

Communication. Language maturity. Mother tongue.Child with Romani mother tongue. Child with Slovak mother tongue.

Abstract

 The need for man to communicate, socialize, form and develop social relationships with other people is one of the basic existential needs of the human race. This need is realized in the context of social relations.In every person's life, the first language is the mother tongue, by which social communication takes place first in the family, then in kindergartens and primary schools.

The developed mother tongue is an advantage of a child when starting school. The mother tongue is the language children learn as the first one in the process of socialization (Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., &Hanique, I. 2010), the language children have learnt in their life, and which influences their future. Also Basil Bernstein (1971) considers a language the main means of person’s socialization, and emphasizes a direct relationship between a social group and a language.In our paper, we discuss language competence in pupils in the first year of school attendance.Our main goal is to compare the language competence of pupils from Roma families whose mother tongue is Roma with pupils whose mother tongue is Slovak. Both groups attend elementary schools with Slovak language.

The sample included pupils with the Romani mother tongue (n1=69) and pupils with the Slovak mother tongue (n2=76); the pupils attended the first year of primary schools with the Slovak language of instruction. The field diagnosis had two phases: the initial phase – at the beginning of a school year in September, and the final phase – at the end of the school year in June. In our study, we used the Heidelberg Speech Development Test (H-S-E-T, Grimmová, Schöller, Mikulajová, 1997), where the authors differentiate between language competence, language performance, and language levels. The test provides a rather complex picture about an achieved level of language development in children of younger school age. Our testing within the Heidelberg test focused on Sentence building (SB). The findings that we state are interesting also in the moment where the diagnosed children whose mother tongue is Romani had significantly lower scores than the children whose mother tongue is Slovak in comparison of the studied period September - June. We associate this status with the possibility that children whose mother tongue is Romani come from socially disadvantaged environment that is accompanied by poverty and social exclusion.

(Vanková, K., 2017) The environment children grow up in significantly influences their communication abilities. To some extent, our findings correspond with Pierre Bourdieu (1990) who, based on his theory, states that children from socially more stimulating environment – families gain better habitus and cultural capital because they are  more prepared for school, are more linguistically capable, and understand the notions significantly better, and vice versa. We emphasize the fact that performance of children from Roma families with the Romani mother tongue is average, and we evaluate the differences in the scoring as statistically significant. The found differences are significantly lower and the progress in vocabulary is not very significant in the studied period in the children with the Romani mother tongue in comparison with the children with the Slovak mother tongue. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] BERNSTEIN, B. Class, Code and Control: Volume 1 – Theoretical Studies Towards A Sociology Of

Language (1971)

[2] BOURDIEU, P., PASSERON, J. C. (1990), Reproduction in education, society and culture, London: Sage

[3] CINA,S.-CINOVÁ, E. (2010),The use of Roma language at primary school. Metodicko-pedagogické centrum.

Bratislava

[4] HORVÁTHOVÁ, J. Chapters from Roma History.Praha: Člověk v tísni, společnost pri ČT, o.p.s., 2002. ISBN

80-7106-615-X.

[5] KALEJA, M. a ZEZULKOVÁ, E.School Inclusion versus Exclusion: Selected Contexts of Education for

Socially Excluded Children and Pupils Needing Support Measures.1. vyd. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita,

Pedagogická fakulta, 2016. 114 s. ISBN 978-80-7464-840-3.

[6] KATRŇÁK, T., (2006), „Faktory podmiňujícívzdělanostníaspiracežákůdevátýchtřídzákladníchškol v České

republice“ Pp. 173- 193 in Matejů, P., Straková, J. et al. (Un) Equal Chances of Education: Educational

Inequalities in the Czech Republic. Praha.

[7] LIÉGEOIS, J. P. Roma, Gypsies, Nomads.Bratislava: Informačné a konzultačné stredisko o Rade Európy,

1995. ISBN 80-967380-4-6.

[8] LEMHÖFER, K., SCHRIEFERS, H., &HANIQUEe, I. (2010). Nativelanguageeffects in learningsecondlanguagegrammaticalgender: A training study. Actapsychologica, 150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.001

[9] MIKULAJOVÁ, M. (1995). Heidelberg Speech Development Test (HSET). KL PF UK, Bratislava. 1995.

Child Psychology and Pathopsychology. Roč. 30, č. 3, s. 323-325. ISSN: 0555-5574.

[10] PORTIK, M. Determinants of Education of a Roma Pupil.Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Pedagogická

fakulta, 2003. ISBN 80-8068-155-4.

[11] PAPE, I. How to Work with Roma Pupils - A Handbook for Teachers and Teachers Assistants.Praha: Slovo

21, 2007.

[12] ROSINSKÝ, R. a kol. (2009). Intercultural aspect of pupils' education from different socio-cultural

backgrounds. In: Pedagogical-psychological and intercultural aspects of the work of teachers of pupils from

different socio-cultural backgrounds.Nitra: FSVaZ UKF, 2009 s. 129. ISBN 978-80-8094-589-3

[13] ŘÍČAN, P. (1991) Family psychology - the field of birth. In Czechoslovak Psychology, roč. 35, č. 1, s. 38-47

[14] ŘÍČAN, G., K. (2003), New Identity of Czech Roma - Hope or Threat? In: V. Smékal (Ed.). support for

optimum development of children 's personality from minorities. Social, pedagogical and psychological aspects

of forming the personality of Roma children and children from other minorities.Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

ČR

[15] PLAŇAVA, I. (1994).Components and processes of family and marriage. In Czechoslovak Psychology,roč.

38, s. 1-14

[16] STRAKOVÁ, J., VESELÝ, A., (2010), "Educational inequalities and their solution from the perspective of

actors"Pp. 404- 420 in Matejů, P., Straková, J., Veselý, A. et al. Inequalities in Education: From Measurement

to Solution.Praha: SLON

[17] ŠIKROVÁ, M.Teaching Roma language at schools. In: Roma culture in Slovakia in the 21st century,

príspevky odzneli dňa 23.10.2003 na konferencii v Šamoríne. Dunajská Streda: LILIUM AURUM, 2004. s. 35

– 38. ISBN 80-8062-211-6

[18] VANKOVÁ, K. (2006)Analysis of socially disadvantaged environment, its elimination and the problem of

Roma identity. In Rosinský R. (ed): Increasing the level of socialization of the Roma ethnicity through

systems of social and missionary education and teacher assistants.Nitra : UKF, 2006. ISBN 80-8050-987-5.

[19] VESELÝ, A., MATEJŮ, P., (2010), "Education Systems and Reproduction of Educational Inequalities" Pp.

38- 90 in Matejů, P., Straková, J., Veselý, A. et al. Inequalities in Education: From Measurement to

Solution.Praha: SLON

[20] WALSH, F.(1982). Normalfamilyprocesses.London: TheGuildford Press N.Y

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Vanková, K., Rosinský, R., & Čerešníková, M. (2019). Communication skills of children from Roma families in Slovak language in the first year of primary schools. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 1993-2000. https://doi.org/10.61841/ewx28c19