Psychosocial Issues in Childhood
Autism Rehabilitation: A Review
Dr Pam McGrath, B.Soc.Wk., MA., Ph D
National Health and Medical Research Council -
Senior
Research Fellow
International Program of Psycho-Social Health
Research,
Central Queensland University
Citation:
McGrath, P (2006)
Psycho-social Issues in Childhood Autism Rehabilitation:
A Review. International Journal
of Psychosocial
Rehabilitation. 11 (1), 29-36.
Abstract
This
article
outlines the research that is available on families coping with a child
diagnosed
with autism or related disorders. The scant research that is available
is
highlighted along with the strong call in the literature for further
work in
this area. Autism has been described as a condition with a greater
number of
stressors than any other disability. Research that has been completed
is
explored and used as a basis to examine new directions required to meet
the
needs of families coping with the demands.Strong recommendations for
further
research have been developed from the available literature. It is the
hope and
expectation that such a review and these recommendations, will go some
way to
assist other researchers interested in furthering the welfare of
families
coping with autism and related disorders.
Keywords: autism, psycho-social,
review,
support
Background
The literature on childhood autism
clearly indicates
that there is limited research available on many aspects of the topic.
In
particular, there are calls in the literature for research into
components of
effective educational programs (Schroeder, Le Blanc & Mayo, 1996).
Also, there
is relatively little research that focuses explicitly on parenting
stress and
coping in families of children with autism (Hastings, Kovshoff, Brown,
Ward, Espinosa & Remington, 2005;
Pakenham, Samios
& Sofronoff, 2005). Or on the social impact upon families of having
a child
with an autism spectrum disorder (Higgins, Bailey & Pearce, 2005).
Although
a few specific treatment methods have been established as efficacious
for some
children with autism in controlled settings, research examining the
translation
of these treatments into early intervention programs has been minimal
(Stahmer,
Collins & Palinkas, 2005). Key writers indicate that there is a
need to
understand the difficulties faced by those with autistic disorders in
educational settings in order to manage and help autistic children
handle their
learning (Jordan, 2005). In addition, there is a call for
researchers to explore the experiences of families engaged in such
educational interventions
for autism (Hastings & Johnson, 2001).
In short, the literature indicates there
is a
significant need for research to assist with planning for health policy
and
service delivery to address the profound problems faced by families
with a
child with autism.
What
We Do Know
Family impact of autism
The one issue that the research is conclusive about is
that families of children with autism report a greater number of
stressors (e.g.,
parental depression and anxiety, difficulties in daily management of
the child,
financial worries, and concerns over adequate educational and
professional
resources) than those with children with other disabilities (Hastings
&
Johnson, 2001; Sivberg, 2002; Tarakeshwar & Pargament, 2001).
A child
diagnosed with autism represents
a constant
source of stress on the family unit, as not only are the caregivers
affected,
but also siblings and relationships among family members (Higgins et
al.,
2005). The child with autism typically requires vast amounts of
parental time
and energy (Tarakeshwar & Pargament, 2001). Mothers of children
with autism
have been found to experience greater stress and difficulties in
adjustment
compared with mothers of children with other physical and intellectual
difficulties (Pakenham et al., 2005). Research indicates that the brunt
of
caring falls upon the mother, with fathers helping mainly with
supervision
rather than physical care or domestic tasks. Siblings also appear not
to be
involved (Holmes & Carr, 1991). Fathers of children with autism
report more
financial impact and disruption of family activities (Rodrigue, Morgan & Geffken, 1992).
The child’s state is the
primary factor
behind anxiety
and stress among parents with autism (Fleischmann, 2005). Among the
most
difficult problems that parents mention are, poor language skills;
inappropriate and embarrassing public behaviour; disruption and
destruction in
the home; violence and aggression; inappropriate sexual expression and
obsessions with eating and toileting (Gray, 2002). Higher levels of
autism
symptomatology are associated with higher reported parental stress
(Hastings
& Johnson, 2001). The more severe the child’s symptom, the greater
is the
degree of parental stress (Dunn, Burbine, Bowers & Tantleff-Dunn,
2001). The
extremely antisocial, disruptive behaviours associated with autism,
such as
self-injurious, tantrum and obsessive/compulsive behaviours, may
preclude a
normal family life (Higgins et al., 2005). Less favourable outcomes are
documented in cases of families with aggressive or violent children
(Gray,
2002). The parents in these families have higher levels of stress and
have few
resources in terms of treatment or residential placement to deal with
their
situation (Gray, 2002). Mothers appear to be the most severely affected
member
of the family (Dunn et al., 2001; Moes, Koegel, Schreibman & Loos,
1992).
Surveys among members of families with a
family member
with autism have found a rise in depression, stress and anxiety
(Fleischmann,
2005). Caregivers of a child with autism often experience helplessness;
feelings of inadequacy and failure; anger; shock; guilt; frustration;
and
resentment (Higgins et al., 2005). Longitudinal data suggests that
families do
not experience a single stressor; rather they experience a pile-up of
demands
(Pakenham et al., 2005). These studies show that social support is very
important in combating depression and stress (Fleischmann, 2005).
<>Lack of available
services
The literature is also conclusive that
there is a
severe lack of available services for families coping with a member
with
autism. Services and the provision of short-term breaks (respites) are
infrequent and insufficient to meet caregivers’ needs (Higgins et al.,
2005). The
disruptive nature of autistic behaviour, and the lack of public
understanding
of the disorder, results in limited availability of child-minding
services and
respite care, which furthers stresses and demands on caregivers
(Higgins et
al., 2005).
Coping strategies
Research suggests the effectiveness of
coping depends
on the positive coping strategies used by the parents, the resources
available
within the family, and the availability of social support from the
spouse,
family and informal networks (Tarakeshwar & Pargament, 2001).
Fathers of
children with autism report more frequent use of wish-fulfilling
fantasy, and
information seeking as coping strategies (Rodrigue et al., 1992).
Acquiring
social support and reframing the experience to see some positives are
most
frequently used coping strategies (Luther, Canham & Cureton, 2005).
Hardiness and social support are predictors of successful adaptation
(Weiss,
2002). There is no direct relationship between social support and
isolation
suggesting that some of the parents feel isolated despite receiving
social
support (Dunn et al., 2001). The Internet allows stressed parents of
children
with autism to forge ties among themselves and extricate themselves
from their
isolation (Fleischmann, 2005).
<>Poorer adaptation was predicted by
other
family
stresses, unwarranted maternal self-blame for the handicap, and
maternal
definition of the handicap as a family catastrophe (Bristol, 1987). Research indicates that it is
important to discourage parents from using escape and avoidance as a
coping
style. Encouragement of more appropriate coping methods and receipt of
social
support is seen as beneficial in buffering the stress and reducing
negative
outcomes ( Dunn et al., 2001).
Research involving parents of autistic
children
indicates that a positive evaluation of direct services to their child,
(e.g., ”…believing
that my child’s program has my family’s best interest in mind.”) was
the most
helpful resource in coping with the challenges of autism (Tarakeshwar
&
Pargament, 2001). Figure 1 provides a
summary
on stress factors that effect families with an autistic child.

Life
stages
As outlined by Figure 2, work by
Schroeder et al.
(1996) indicates that there are definable stages and critical points of
transition for families coping with a child with an autistic disorder.
They
demonstrate the need to plan transitions in advance. Gray (2002)
outlines the
likely transition points. The pre-diagnosis early years are intensely
stressful. Diagnosis and placement in treatment and educational
programs
reduces stress, the child becomes more orderly and the life of the
family more
settled. Adolescence becomes another period of disruption, with
increasing
physical and sexual maturity. Increased seizures and parental emotional
exhaustion
as common problems. Early adulthood also brings increased stresses
associated
with establishing living and work arrangements.

Importance of therapeutic and educational
support.
The work
that has been completed on educational strategies
for autistic children indicates that interventions can have a positive
outcome
in terms of teaching autistic children new skills and coping strategies
(Schroeder et al., 1996). Existing data suggests that stress and
depression
associated with autism are amenable to psycho-educational intervention
(Hastings & Johnson, 2001). Anger management programs based on
helping
autistic children to recognise triggers, exert control over their
physical
arousal, and develop strategies through such avenues as role play have
been
shown through impressionistic reports to be effective (Kellner &
Tutin,
1995). Improved verbal and physical sharing has been demonstrated
(Sawyer, Luiselli,
Riciardi & Gower, 2005). There is some evidence of improvements in
the
child’s sociability, emotional control and attention span during
treatment
(Gray, 2002). Training courses have been shown to have a beneficial
effect on
both parent’s and children’s communication skills (McConachie, Randle,
Hammal
& Le Couteur, 2005). It is recorded that the best teaching arises
from an
empathetic understanding and a willingness to be flexible, the worst,
from
rigidity and an expectation that it is the child who must change (Jordan, 2005).
Parents are an important part of
treatment for a child
with autism and have been frequently trained and referred to as co-therapists (Pakenham et al., 2005).
Importantly, the research indicates that special education teachers
received
the highest support rating in terms of parental perception of support
for
coping (Newsome, 2000).
<>Several studies have reported
decreased
parental
stress as a result of early intervention with children (Hastings &
Johnson,
2001). Indeed, research indicates that beliefs about the efficacy of
the
educational/therapeutic interventions were associated with lower
reported
stress (Hastings & Johnson, 2001). As intervention in autism are
often
intensive, time-consuming, and financially draining, it has been argued
there
is an ethical imperative to ensure that such programs are assessed
through
independent research (Hastings & Johnson, 2001). However, the
available
evidence indicates that few providers have a clear understanding of
evidence-based practice, and all providers report concerns about
adequate
training (Stahmer et al., 2005). Effective evaluation and documentation
of
efficacy for educational and therapeutic interventions for autistic
children
through research is seen as essential to ensure a high standard
practice
(Simpson, 2005).
Significantly, stress and burnout
contribute to a high
turnover of rehabilitation staff (Layne, Hohenshil & Singh, 2004).
Research
indicates that it is the occupational stress inherent in the job
function,
rather than individual coping resources or demographics that account
for the
turnover (Layne et al., 2004). It is believed that turnover can
negatively
affect an organisations effectiveness, or the degree to which an
organisation
is able to achieve its goals (Layne et al., 2004).
Moving On -
Priority Areas for Research
The available international research
points to a
number of priority areas of research, if families with a child
diagnosed with
autism and related disorders are to receive optimum care. In
particular, there
is presently a call for descriptive and evaluative research on
psycho-educational programs and services. It is considered important
for the
development of this, to date, neglected area to evaluate interventions
designed
to educate and assist families to cope with autism and related
disorders. Such research
will first and foremost assist service providers in evaluating their
interventions, and thus have quality assurance in the form of reliable
and independent
information to guide programmatic growth and development. The
descriptive
research needs to provide insight on the experience from the child and
family
perspective to ensure developments are mindful of consumer needs.
Ultimately
the research can make an important contribution to the international
community
of family, carers, therapists and educators by providing well
researched
insights and evaluations of a diversity of service and program
initiatives for
the care of autistic children.
Based on the prior introductory discussion
of
available research, Figure 3 provides a suggested outline of key
parameters
required for researchers interested in extending the present work
available. It is essential to have
longitudinal base-line data that documents both individual and group
changes
over the period of the child’s involvement in the program or service.
Such
information will provide a basis to build an understanding of the
efficacy or
otherwise of interventions on the child’s development. The base line
data needs
to be complemented by thorough and independent documentation and
evaluation of
the particular psycho-educational program under consideration.
Particular
attention needs to be paid to the issue of therapist/carer burn out. As each program or service will only be one
point
of connection and support for families with an autistic child, it is
also
essential to document such service provision in the context of other
resources
and services available. By taking the four parameters- as outlined in
Figure 3 -
into consideration a full account of the role, efficacy and benefits of
individual services or programs can be gleaned.

Conclusion
This article outlines the research that is available
on families coping with a child diagnosed with autism or related
disorders. The
scant research that is available is highlighted along with the strong
call in
the literature for further work in this area. Autism has been described
as a
condition with a greater number of stressors than any other disability.
Research
that has been completed is explored and used as a basis to examine the
new
directions required to meet the needs of families coping with the
demands.
Strong recommendations for further research have been developed from
the
available literature. It is the hope and expectation of the author that
such a
review and these recommendations, will go some way to assist other
researchers
interested in furthering the welfare of families coping with a child
diagnosed
with autism and related disorders.
<>
References
Bristol, M. (1987) Mothers of children with autism
or communication disorders: Successful
adaptation and the double ABCX model. Journal
of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17(4), 469-486.
Dunn, M., Burbine, T., Bowers, C., &
Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2001) Moderators of stress in parents of children
with
Autism. Community Mental Health Journal,
37(1), 39-51.
Fleischmann, A.
(2005) The hero’s story and autism. Autism,
9(3), 299-316.
Gray, D. (2002) Ten years on: A
longitudinal study of families of children with autism. Journal
of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 27(3),
215-222.
Hastings, R., & Johnson, E. (2001) Stress in UK families conducting intensive home-based
behavioural interventions for
their young child with autism. Journal of
Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(3),
327-336.
Hastings, R., Kovshoff, H., Brown, T., Ward,
N., Espinosa, F., & Remington, B. (2005) Coping strategies in
mothers and
fathers of preschool and school-age children with autism. Autism,
9(4), 377-391.
Higgins, D., Bailey, S., & Pearce, J.
(2005) Factors associated with functioning style and coping strategies
of
families with a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism,
9(2), 125-137.
Holmes, N., & Carr, J. (1991) The
pattern of care in families of adults with a mental handicap: A
comparison
between families of autistic adults and down syndrome adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 21(2), 159-176.
Jordan, R. (2005) Managing autism and asperger’s
syndrome in current educational provision. Pediatric
Rehabilitation, 8(2), 104-112.
Kellner, H., & Tutin, J. (1995) A
school based anger management program for developmentally and
emotionally
disabled high school students. Health
Source, 30(120),
1-8.
Layne, C., Hohenshil, T., & Singh, K.
(2004) The relationship of occupational stress, psychological strain,
and
coping resources to the turnover intensions of rehabilitation
counsellors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48(1), 19-30.
Luther, E., Canham, D., & Cureton, V.
(2005) Coping and social support for parents of children with autism. Journal of School Nursing, 21(1), 40-47.
McConachie, H., Randle, V., Hammal, D., &
Le Couteur, A. (2005) A controlled trial of a training course for
parents of
children with suspected autism spectrum disorder. The
Journal of Pediatrics, 147(3),
335-340.
Moes, D., Koegel, R., Schreibman, L., &
Loos, L. (1992) Stress profiles for mothers and fathers of children
with autism.
Psychological Reports, 71, 1272-1274.
Newsome, W. (2000) Parental perceptions
during periods of transition: Implications for social workers serving
families
coping with autism. Journal of Family
Social Work, 5(2), 17-31.
Pakenham, K., Samios, C., & Sofronoff,
K. (2005) Adjustment of mothers of children with asperger syndrome: An
application of the double ABCX model of family adjustment. Autism,
9(2), 191-212.
Rodrigue, J., Morgan, S., & Geffken, G.
(1992) Psychosocial adaptation of fathers of children with autism, down
syndrome, and normal development. Journal
of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22(2),
249-263.
Sawyer, L., Luiselli, J., Riciardi, J., &
Gower, J. (2005) Teaching a child with autism to share among peers in
an
integrated preschool classroom: Acquisition, maintenance, and social
validation.
Education & Treatment of Children, 28(1),
1-10.
Schroeder, S., Le Banc, J., & Mayo, L.
(1996) Brief Report: A life-span perspective on the development of
individuals
with autism. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 26(2), 251-255.
Simpson, R. (2005) Evidence-based practices
and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on
Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(3),
140-149.
Sivberg, B. (2002)
Family system and coping behaviour. Autism,
6(4), 397-409.
Stahmer, A., Collins, N., & Palinkas,
L. (2005) Early intervention practices for children with autism:
Descriptions
from community providers. Focus on Autism
& Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(2), 66-79.
Tarakeshwar, N., & Pargament, K. (2001)
Religious coping in families of children with autism. Focus
on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(4),
247-260.
Weiss, M. (2002) Hardiness and social
support as predictors of stress in mothers of typical children,
children with
autism, and children with mental retardation. Autism, 6(1), 115-130.